Quote Originally Posted by Tam Seddon View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Tam Seddon View Post
Your comparing three fighters as if they are all bound to meet the same fate? That doesnt make sense at all. Carl Froch hasnt done anything to suggest hes a fraud, hes won every fight in mostly knockout fashion and NEVER been knocked down. Hes shown he can also take a dig, which is a bit more than Amir Khan can do! Paul Smith just simply underestimated the fighter and he paid the price for it. He wasnt up for the fight be I can guarentee 9 times out 10 Paul would have beaten him.

Carl is my favourite fighter, im not not blinded, i just tend to support him because thats what people do who follow their fighter. Either way, all question are going to be answered in the next year because I can see Carl getting a fight with Mikkel Kessler, Librando Andrade, Lucian Bute or maybe even Kelly Pavlik. The more elite fighters at 168. If he does get sparked out, i wont be a little bitch and make up all of the excuses under the sun. Im not like that at all, all im saying is Carl Froch has the potential to be a great fighter and you should recognise that.
Fraud hasn't done anything to suggest he's the real thing either. And yes I expect the same fate that happened to Con and Shiit to happen to Fraud. And I don't want to hear all these lame ass excuses about Paul Shiit. The man is a professional fighter. He didn't lose cuz he underestimated his opponent. He lost cuz he's not the fighter he was being hyped up to be. He's average on his best day.
But hes been working towards the shot at the title. Hes not ducking anybody and i cant see why he is a fraud though? hes shown hes way above the class hes been fighting and he will knock out pascal and prove that!
Great. He's shown he's above the garbage D class opposition. Good to see your easily impressed.