Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 61

Thread: Froch-Pascal Set !!!! Dec 6th

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    18,672
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Froch-Pascal Set !!!! Dec 6th

    Quote Originally Posted by Tam Seddon View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Tam Seddon View Post
    But in 2009 Carl will be fighting these high profiled fighters. Jean Pascal is the start of good things to come. Carl isnt a Fraud, its just your arragonce towards British fighters that makes you believe he is. But hes going to be world champion on 6th Dec and going to be the man to be at 168!
    I think it's more of you overrating him cuz he's a UK fighter. Which is nothing new. It wasn't to long ago that a certain poster here, who I ain't going to name (Leftylee) who swore up and down Paul Shiit (Smith) was a future champion. I think it's become pretty clear that Shiit will never be a champion. Look at all the undeserved hype A Mere Con got. Con still ain't found all his teeth yet. Your doing the same thing with Fraud. You make him seem like he's some kind of wrecking machine with little to no faults. When in reality is he's far from a wrecking machine. And he has a ton of faults. You either don't know how to pick up on them. Are blinded by your lust for him. Or your just straight ignoring them for whatever reasons. Bottom line is Fraud, like Shiit and Con has done nothing in his career. As soon as he faces a top fighter he will get knocked out. And no Pascal is not a type fighter.
    Your comparing three fighters as if they are all bound to meet the same fate? That doesnt make sense at all. Carl Froch hasnt done anything to suggest hes a fraud, hes won every fight in mostly knockout fashion and NEVER been knocked down. Hes shown he can also take a dig, which is a bit more than Amir Khan can do! Paul Smith just simply underestimated the fighter and he paid the price for it. He wasnt up for the fight be I can guarentee 9 times out 10 Paul would have beaten him.

    Carl is my favourite fighter, im not not blinded, i just tend to support him because thats what people do who follow their fighter. Either way, all question are going to be answered in the next year because I can see Carl getting a fight with Mikkel Kessler, Librando Andrade, Lucian Bute or maybe even Kelly Pavlik. The more elite fighters at 168. If he does get sparked out, i wont be a little bitch and make up all of the excuses under the sun. Im not like that at all, all im saying is Carl Froch has the potential to be a great fighter and you should recognise that.
    Fraud hasn't done anything to suggest he's the real thing either. And yes I expect the same fate that happened to Con and Shiit to happen to Fraud. And I don't want to hear all these lame ass excuses about Paul Shiit. The man is a professional fighter. He didn't lose cuz he underestimated his opponent. He lost cuz he's not the fighter he was being hyped up to be. He's average on his best day.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Southport
    Posts
    8,224
    Mentioned
    41 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1865
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Froch-Pascal Set !!!! Dec 6th

    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Tam Seddon View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post

    I think it's more of you overrating him cuz he's a UK fighter. Which is nothing new. It wasn't to long ago that a certain poster here, who I ain't going to name (Leftylee) who swore up and down Paul Shiit (Smith) was a future champion. I think it's become pretty clear that Shiit will never be a champion. Look at all the undeserved hype A Mere Con got. Con still ain't found all his teeth yet. Your doing the same thing with Fraud. You make him seem like he's some kind of wrecking machine with little to no faults. When in reality is he's far from a wrecking machine. And he has a ton of faults. You either don't know how to pick up on them. Are blinded by your lust for him. Or your just straight ignoring them for whatever reasons. Bottom line is Fraud, like Shiit and Con has done nothing in his career. As soon as he faces a top fighter he will get knocked out. And no Pascal is not a type fighter.
    Your comparing three fighters as if they are all bound to meet the same fate? That doesnt make sense at all. Carl Froch hasnt done anything to suggest hes a fraud, hes won every fight in mostly knockout fashion and NEVER been knocked down. Hes shown he can also take a dig, which is a bit more than Amir Khan can do! Paul Smith just simply underestimated the fighter and he paid the price for it. He wasnt up for the fight be I can guarentee 9 times out 10 Paul would have beaten him.

    Carl is my favourite fighter, im not not blinded, i just tend to support him because thats what people do who follow their fighter. Either way, all question are going to be answered in the next year because I can see Carl getting a fight with Mikkel Kessler, Librando Andrade, Lucian Bute or maybe even Kelly Pavlik. The more elite fighters at 168. If he does get sparked out, i wont be a little bitch and make up all of the excuses under the sun. Im not like that at all, all im saying is Carl Froch has the potential to be a great fighter and you should recognise that.
    Fraud hasn't done anything to suggest he's the real thing either. And yes I expect the same fate that happened to Con and Shiit to happen to Fraud. And I don't want to hear all these lame ass excuses about Paul Shiit. The man is a professional fighter. He didn't lose cuz he underestimated his opponent. He lost cuz he's not the fighter he was being hyped up to be. He's average on his best day.
    But hes been working towards the shot at the title. Hes not ducking anybody and i cant see why he is a fraud though? hes shown hes way above the class hes been fighting and he will knock out pascal and prove that!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Guernsey, Channel Islands
    Posts
    8,719
    Mentioned
    208 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1396
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Froch-Pascal Set !!!! Dec 6th

    Quote Originally Posted by Tam Seddon View Post
    Hes not ducking anybody and i cant see why he is a fraud though?
    Should have gone to specsavers

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    British Columbia, Canada
    Posts
    18,766
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4363
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Froch-Pascal Set !!!! Dec 6th

    Pascal just isn't that good. I haven't seen much of Froch, but based on his reputation and what I've seen of Pascal, he should take this.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    18,672
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Froch-Pascal Set !!!! Dec 6th

    Quote Originally Posted by Tam Seddon View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Tam Seddon View Post
    Your comparing three fighters as if they are all bound to meet the same fate? That doesnt make sense at all. Carl Froch hasnt done anything to suggest hes a fraud, hes won every fight in mostly knockout fashion and NEVER been knocked down. Hes shown he can also take a dig, which is a bit more than Amir Khan can do! Paul Smith just simply underestimated the fighter and he paid the price for it. He wasnt up for the fight be I can guarentee 9 times out 10 Paul would have beaten him.

    Carl is my favourite fighter, im not not blinded, i just tend to support him because thats what people do who follow their fighter. Either way, all question are going to be answered in the next year because I can see Carl getting a fight with Mikkel Kessler, Librando Andrade, Lucian Bute or maybe even Kelly Pavlik. The more elite fighters at 168. If he does get sparked out, i wont be a little bitch and make up all of the excuses under the sun. Im not like that at all, all im saying is Carl Froch has the potential to be a great fighter and you should recognise that.
    Fraud hasn't done anything to suggest he's the real thing either. And yes I expect the same fate that happened to Con and Shiit to happen to Fraud. And I don't want to hear all these lame ass excuses about Paul Shiit. The man is a professional fighter. He didn't lose cuz he underestimated his opponent. He lost cuz he's not the fighter he was being hyped up to be. He's average on his best day.
    But hes been working towards the shot at the title. Hes not ducking anybody and i cant see why he is a fraud though? hes shown hes way above the class hes been fighting and he will knock out pascal and prove that!
    Great. He's shown he's above the garbage D class opposition. Good to see your easily impressed.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    14,152
    Mentioned
    124 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1996
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Froch-Pascal Set !!!! Dec 6th

    "I would have loved to fight Calzaghe in July and could have been ready. I could have gone back into training next week, but I don't think Calzaghe and his team wanted to risk sampling the power of my right uppercut!
    "His promoter made an offer to me that I felt was derisory. They also turned down a very generous offer of £1.6 million from my promoter Mick Hennessy, which valued the fight at twice their amount if you work on the standard terms of the split for a purse bid.




    FROCH HAS SURGERY | Sporting Life - Boxing News | Joe Calzaghe, Amir Khan, Ricky Hatton, Manny Pacquiao, Floyd Mayweather, Oscar De La Hoya, Miguel Cotto.


    If Warren had made an offer that paid Froch nothing to fight Calzaghe, that still wouldn't have been "derisory." Instead he got offered a couple of hundred thousand and turned it down. If Froch actually believes he's as good as he claims he is, he would have got in the ring, KO'd Calzaghe and become an overnight superstar with million pound purses for all his subsequent fights. And it's irrelevant if Warren had options afterwards either. Having two promoters split the promoter's share of future fights or having one guy get it all is irrelevant to Froch. If Froch had taken the fight and beaten Calzaghe he'd have secured his future in one fight.

    A real fighter would have snapped Warren's hand off. Calzaghe netted less than £50 000 for the Eubank fight and Eubank made less again for his chance against Benn. Real fighters take their opportunity and use it to propel them to stardom. Froch bottled it.

    And the £1.6 million offer is just dissembling, I'm sure you know why. Basically just a load of bs to cover up him bottling his big opportunity. Froch knows what he's capable of and that's why he didn't take the fight.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    10 miles from Manchester, 6 miles from Bolton
    Posts
    1,560
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1244
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Froch-Pascal Set !!!! Dec 6th

    I just hope that if Froch wins the belt (I think he will) then he will get some big defences and not just fight pish opponents.

    He really needs to step up his class of opponenets or stop talking shit about how he'sthe best
    Hidden Content


    If it's yellow, let it mellow... If it's brown, invite me 'round...

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Southport
    Posts
    8,224
    Mentioned
    41 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1865
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Froch-Pascal Set !!!! Dec 6th

    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Tam Seddon View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post

    Fraud hasn't done anything to suggest he's the real thing either. And yes I expect the same fate that happened to Con and Shiit to happen to Fraud. And I don't want to hear all these lame ass excuses about Paul Shiit. The man is a professional fighter. He didn't lose cuz he underestimated his opponent. He lost cuz he's not the fighter he was being hyped up to be. He's average on his best day.
    But hes been working towards the shot at the title. Hes not ducking anybody and i cant see why he is a fraud though? hes shown hes way above the class hes been fighting and he will knock out pascal and prove that!
    Great. He's shown he's above the garbage D class opposition. Good to see your easily impressed.
    I know i was impressed and thats why im going to keep following him. I believe we still have yet to see the best out of Carl Froch and there are going to be some great match ups coming up! Also if you look at any of the top 10 at 168 most of their record was built on lower tier fighters and worked their to the title in order to fight the better quality fighters. It doesnt mean your a shit fighter just because you have not fought the best from the start of your career. boxing is a learning process and Carl has learned that well in the last few years, but hes ready for this step up now. So I dont actually see what your problem is. Kessler didnt step it up untill Mundine maybe, so it shows that fighters need a basis to grow on rarther than fighting the best from an early age and getting beaten. It can effect fighters, ie Junior Witter, Rey Bautsista and im going to guess Amir Khan.
    Last edited by Tam Seddon; 09-22-2008 at 07:24 AM.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    10 miles from Manchester, 6 miles from Bolton
    Posts
    1,560
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1244
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Froch-Pascal Set !!!! Dec 6th

    Quote Originally Posted by Tam Seddon View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Tam Seddon View Post
    But hes been working towards the shot at the title. Hes not ducking anybody and i cant see why he is a fraud though? hes shown hes way above the class hes been fighting and he will knock out pascal and prove that!
    Great. He's shown he's above the garbage D class opposition. Good to see your easily impressed.
    I know i was impressed and thats why im going to keep following him. I believe we still have yet to see the best out of Carl Froch and there are going to be some great match ups coming up! Also if you look at any of the top 10 at 168 most of their record was built on lower tier fighters and worked their to the title in order to fight the better quality fighters. It doesnt mean your a shit fighter just because you have not fought the best from the start of your career. boxing is a learning process and Carl has learned that well in the last few years, but hes ready for this step up now. So I dont actually see what your problem is. Kessler didnt step it up untill Mundine maybe, so it shows that fighters need a basis to grow on rarther than fighting the best from an early age and getting beaten. It can effect fighters, ie Junior Witter, Rey Bautsista and im going to guess Amir Khan.

    Lets hope your right for Froch, would like to see him do well, but even with the belt i see him struggling to get the really big fights. And at hi age its gotta be the next couple of years
    Hidden Content


    If it's yellow, let it mellow... If it's brown, invite me 'round...

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Guernsey, Channel Islands
    Posts
    8,719
    Mentioned
    208 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1396
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Froch-Pascal Set !!!! Dec 6th

    Quote Originally Posted by Tam Seddon View Post
    Also if you look at any of the top 10 at 168 most of their record was built on lower tier fighters and worked their to the title in order to fight the better quality fighters.
    Well, Froch will fight the better fighters but at the very end of his career, when ever he actually does decide to fight them and it will be the end of his career

    Then he will drop this ridiculous facade of being a fighter

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Southport
    Posts
    8,224
    Mentioned
    41 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1865
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Froch-Pascal Set !!!! Dec 6th

    Quote Originally Posted by ross View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Tam Seddon View Post
    Also if you look at any of the top 10 at 168 most of their record was built on lower tier fighters and worked their to the title in order to fight the better quality fighters.
    Well, Froch will fight the better fighters but at the very end of his career, when ever he actually does decide to fight them and it will be the end of his career

    Then he will drop this ridiculous facade of being a fighter
    well we will have to see about that. I doubt it will happen like that to be honest, but your entitled to your own opinion, even if i dont agree with it.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    6,176
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2312
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Froch-Pascal Set !!!! Dec 6th

    Froch should take this fight pretty easily, maybe even by late round stoppage! People can say what they want about Froch but Pascal is an even worse fraud IMO!
    The Best There Is, The Best There Was, The Best There Ever Will Be

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. If Lacy Fights Taylor, Froch Fights Pascal
    By amat in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 07-26-2008, 03:00 AM
  2. Jean Pascal in AZ
    By killersheep in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 07-03-2008, 10:10 PM
  3. Miranda - Pascal in the works?
    By CFH in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 11-08-2007, 03:40 AM
  4. Anyone heard of Jean Pascal?
    By Majesty in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 07-08-2007, 09:04 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing