Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
Quote Originally Posted by CGM View Post
LOL. I suppose you have no intention of providing refs to support your claim. Not only do I have to support my claims, I have to support yours as well.

Support what claims? It's a FACT that they have found soft tissue in dinosaur bones. It's a FACT that they have found unfossilied Hadrosaur bones that for over 20 years were discarded as they assumed they were just fresh bison bones from a hundred or so years ago.

What interperations the evolutionists give to this is up to them and you.

I believe it's compelling evidence that they arn't millions of years old but if you wish to believe the scientific account that somehow bones can remain fresh and not deteriorate for 70 million years due to some unknown natural preservatin technique that is fine.

OK Bilbo you talk a good line. You say it's FACT but you continually refuse to provide any supporting references. I provided refs that say otherwise, you provide nada. Zilch. Just some claims that you have carefully studied blah blah blah.

IMO, if there really was proven facts that provided compelling evidence that dinosaurs weren't millions of years old, there would be a lot more publicity, cause I do believe the general public is very interested in that kind of stuff. But I suppose you will say people don't want to know, or maybe just that I don't want to know. That's fine. Whatever you want to believe.

Under the circumstances, I see no point in continuing. I've got better things to do than debate aimlessly. Over and out.