Who among the 147 champs you want PAC to possibly get his 7th division title?

[CutMeMick]

Nothing wrong with Naito being the lineal champ, he beat the man who beat the man... Heck, Naito defeated Pongsucklick ... I can even accept Armando Santa Cruz being lineal champ at one time if the judges didn't rob him against Casamayor... Santa Cruz is not the best lightweight but he beat the man...

OK, I am asking you a simple question yes or no.
Is Naito the lineal champ?

You're the one who's off Mick ... including your mockery of Filipino boxing fans' knowledge about lineages... You seems to be fair but my respect for you become lesser because of that opinion... Why? Do you consider only Americans and Mexicans has authority/knowledge about lineages??
.

I'm ONLY mocking the ones who come on here trying to preach something that is clearly not true.
If he shoe fits, wear it.
I'm fair and I respect anyone who respects me.
At no point did I disrespect you.
Look up the lineage by Ring Magazine on the Flyweight division and you will see the lineage is lost somewhere along Chitalada-Kim, after that their is no lineal champ.
Also another bold lie Cliff typed is the whole WBC/Lineal thing.
Yes at one point it might have been or looked that way but their was no ties between the 2.
1st it was the NYSAC and then NBA formed the WBA.
1988 - Kim lineal
1989 - Vacant
1990 thru 2009 - Vacant.


The things I have to do, to get a point accross and I bet you eventhought I am clearly showing you FACTS you are still gonna be blind.

The Ring Magazine's Annual Ratings: Flyweight--1980s - Boxrec Boxing Encyclopaedia

The Ring Magazine's Annual Ratings: Flyweight--1990s - Boxrec Boxing Encyclopaedia

Notice how the lineage is lost in 1989 and is never picked up.