Re: When Pacquiao beats Cotto

Originally Posted by
miles

Originally Posted by
Fenster

Originally Posted by
miles
Yep, he's a smart businessman too. I don't like these catchweights, that's all. Pac beat Hatton up fair and square and that was cool. I can give credit. Manny beat him up, Hatton was stupid but that's life. But to now try and use catchweights to secure advantages is really crappy and weak. It shows a Manny at the end of his limits trying to take what he can at the least cost. And as a purist, I just hate that.
Surely you would rather see the fight than not though?
If catchweights mean certain fights will happen then it's a good thing, no? And this is a great fight.
One year ago a fight between Cotto and Pac would have been laughed out of town - because obviously Pac would get killed. Now he's the favourite. Amazing.
Of course I will watch. How could I not?
But it would mean that bit more if it was 147 no questions asked. That for me is the real fight and if Manny topples the man then all you can do is sit back and say "fair play".
As it is, we have debates like this that shouldn't be happening. It should be a 147 fight.
Is Manny really that scared by a couple of pounds?
Maybe he is, but the important thing is Cotto wasn't scared about losing a couple of pounds, otherwise he would have refused the fight
3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.
Bookmarks