Who won? Froch? Or Dirrell?

[ryanman]

Like that would of mattered. Soon as Fraud would of hit the canvas the bell would of rang early and Fraud's corner would of rushed in to help him. Some how it would of been ruled a slip. I seen this shiit happen in Europe before. Don't make a fool of yourself by denying it hasn't. It's the most corrupt continent in the whole fukkin world.

You are ridiculous. That just doesn't happen. Sure some european countries are quite bad (Germany, Italy for instance, Italy being the worst IMO) but i honestly don't feel the UK is any worse than anywhere else, and certainly not worse than good ol' YooS.A. You also make a fool of yourself by wrongly viewing Europe as a single entity. Its a diverse continent containing wildly different cultures, customs and ethics. The UK does not exactly have a history of 'corrupt' decisions, and in fact i challenge you to a name and shame. You name an incident of corrupt scoring in the UK and i will reply with an example from the US.

Oh and just to clarify, i had Dirrell winning by two. But I have no real problem with the decision as he was supposed to be taking part in a boxing match, not strictly come dancing. Either way i think its creative to call the outcome corrupt.

It's obvious your Boxing knowledge is very limited if you actually believe that. Go watch more Boxing and gain more knowledge. Maybe than you'll be worth debating with.

Im thinking i've got more than enough already for someone on your level.
Anyhow, i wasn't saying bad decisions don't happen. But your crazy example wouldn't happen in the UK. Or can you name one example when something remotely similar to that has happened in the UK?