
Originally Posted by
ono

Originally Posted by
ElTerribleMorales
difference is Bradley's beaten Holt, and was schooling Campbell until the headbutt
Great. What's Holt ever done? Headbutted Torres to defeat. That's literally it.
What does Nate Campbell have in his arsenal that makes beating him seem such a great achievement? Especially at 140?
All Campbell has is a surprise close win over Juan Diaz - who again has a history of being in very close fights against mediocre - but marketable fighters.
Holt also has wins over the bum that is David Diaz (if he's considered a "big win" for Manny why not for the first guy to do it), Hlatshwayo (a good solid fighter), Arnaoutis (need i say more? lol), and D-Hop
as for Campbell, did you forget that he also beat Ali Funeka? the same Funeka he dropped like a bag of bricks twice, and the same Funeka that basically dominated the undefeated Joan Guzman, and possibly the #1 or #2 guy at 135 now that Marquez has evidently left lightweight, don't try to change history cause come fight night most people had Campbell on their p4p lists and viewed the fight as a 50/50 fight, and IMO if it weren't for the headbutt Bradley still would have stopped him late
Bookmarks