What is the source of the anger in this story?

That he killed a hamster?
That he is on benefits?
Or that he spends £70 a week on weed?

I find the link a bit absurd to be honest. Man on benefits kills a hamster, he must lose his benefits.

As for the £70 a week on weed. The government give you what you need to live on. If he gets 800 a month and manages to budget well enough to spend £70 quid on weed then fair play to him.

I'm a bit meh on the whole story. A hamster is just a rat without a tail at the end of the day.