Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 53

Thread: Hopkins vs Dawson NO FOUL?!

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    6,272
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Hopkins vs Dawson NO FOUL?!

    Miles is right here..

    This scumbag bernard tried to pull another one of his conjobs.. He tried to fake himself into a DQ victory but oh well, it didnt work cuz the ref knew better..

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    12,748
    Mentioned
    175 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1343
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Hopkins vs Dawson NO FOUL?!

    Quote Originally Posted by FinitoElDinamita View Post
    Miles is right here..

    This scumbag bernard tried to pull another one of his conjobs.. He tried to fake himself into a DQ victory but oh well, it didnt work cuz the ref knew better..

    No, he isnt. I agree that Hopkins tried to embelish it all to steal the DQ win, BUT that is no basis for the ref making the call that he did. Neither is Hopkins being a dirty fighter in general, this call was really black and white and the ref blew it. The fact is that Hopkins was never told that he would lose by TKO if he didn't continue, and I believe he well may have fought on if the ref had been competent and done so. So even for those who pretend to be certain that Hopkins was faking injury, the referee completely shit his pants out there. But that is all really besides the main issue; how on earth can you rule something of this nature a TKO after ONE round has been completed on the scorecards? There was no legal punch that in any way led to the fight being stopped, it was a clear foul whether flagrant or not.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    1,190
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1091
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Hopkins vs Dawson NO FOUL?!

    You could say Bernard had it coming because of his past actions but the fight should be a reason to call for a rematch if that is what everyone believes. Like Bernard or not, like Dawson or not, the last time I checked, boxing is and will always be a sport and that kind of behavior doesn't just hurt the fighters involved but the fans are left hanging and this contributes to the nay Sayers arguments to abolish one of the oldest sports in the world. If Dawson wants to fight that way then the MMA will welcome him with open arms. Bernard is no angel and I'm not one of his fans but I'd rather see him take a good licking instead for the trash he spews. A rematch is in order and let's get a referee that knows the rules and most of all, one that can see. We fans need to step in and explain that we pay their salaries.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Hopkins-Dawson in negotiations for showdown
    By generalbulldog in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-27-2011, 07:10 PM
  2. How about Hopkins Vs. Dawson
    By ElTerribleMorales in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 12-30-2008, 10:20 PM
  3. When is Dawson-Hopkins going to happen? :(
    By Taeth in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 11-27-2008, 09:55 PM
  4. Replies: 56
    Last Post: 01-11-2007, 07:00 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing