Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 18

Thread: Golden Boy files protest to Ring, WBC, and CAC, over the Hopkins ruling

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Southport
    Posts
    8,224
    Mentioned
    41 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1875
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    It should be in Hopkins' favour, that was complete shit!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    6,903
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Golden Boy files protest to Ring, WBC, and CAC, over the Hopkins ruling

    Quote Originally Posted by Tam Seddon View Post
    It should be in Hopkins' favour, that was complete shit!
    If this had happened to someone else besides Hopkins, i'd probably give a shit. The thing is, either way, there needs to be a rematch ordered, this needs to get settled in the ring, ASAP, so we can get bored to tears again.

    Hopefully next time it won't be on PPV.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    7,933
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1358
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Golden Boy files protest to Ring, WBC, and CAC, over the Hopkins ruling

    Quote Originally Posted by Mars_ax View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Tam Seddon View Post
    It should be in Hopkins' favour, that was complete shit!
    If this had happened to someone else besides Hopkins, i'd probably give a shit. The thing is, either way, there needs to be a rematch ordered, this needs to get settled in the ring, ASAP, so we can get bored to tears again.

    Hopefully next time it won't be on PPV.
    thing is, if it's up to Dawson...there wont be a rematch cause he already bitched out of one

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    6,903
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Golden Boy files protest to Ring, WBC, and CAC, over the Hopkins ruling

    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Mars_ax View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Tam Seddon View Post
    It should be in Hopkins' favour, that was complete shit!
    If this had happened to someone else besides Hopkins, i'd probably give a shit. The thing is, either way, there needs to be a rematch ordered, this needs to get settled in the ring, ASAP, so we can get bored to tears again.

    Hopefully next time it won't be on PPV.
    thing is, if it's up to Dawson...there wont be a rematch cause he already bitched out of one

    I really don't know all the facts, but couldn't the CAC, or the WBC order a rematch whether Dawson likes it or not?

    BTW, the California Athletic Commission sanctioned the fight, so it's up to the CAC whether or not to reverse or change the decision, not Ring or the WBC.
    Last edited by Mars_ax; 10-18-2011 at 03:44 AM.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    7,933
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1358
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Golden Boy files protest to Ring, WBC, and CAC, over the Hopkins ruling

    Quote Originally Posted by Mars_ax View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Mars_ax View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Tam Seddon View Post
    It should be in Hopkins' favour, that was complete shit!
    If this had happened to someone else besides Hopkins, i'd probably give a shit. The thing is, either way, there needs to be a rematch ordered, this needs to get settled in the ring, ASAP, so we can get bored to tears again.

    Hopefully next time it won't be on PPV.
    thing is, if it's up to Dawson...there wont be a rematch cause he already bitched out of one

    I really don't know all the facts, but couldn't the CAC, or the WBC order a rematch whether Dawson likes it or not?

    BTW, the California Athletic Commission sanctioned the fight, so it's up to the CAC whether or not to reverse or change the decision, not Ring or the WBC.
    it's up to the CAC to reverse the decision, it's up to the WBC to order a rematch, but even if the WBC order's a rematch it's gonna be no shock if right after you hear that Dawson drops the title

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    6,903
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Golden Boy files protest to Ring, WBC, and CAC, over the Hopkins ruling

    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Mars_ax View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Mars_ax View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Tam Seddon View Post
    It should be in Hopkins' favour, that was complete shit!
    If this had happened to someone else besides Hopkins, i'd probably give a shit. The thing is, either way, there needs to be a rematch ordered, this needs to get settled in the ring, ASAP, so we can get bored to tears again.

    Hopefully next time it won't be on PPV.
    thing is, if it's up to Dawson...there wont be a rematch cause he already bitched out of one

    I really don't know all the facts, but couldn't the CAC, or the WBC order a rematch whether Dawson likes it or not?

    BTW, the California Athletic Commission sanctioned the fight, so it's up to the CAC whether or not to reverse or change the decision, not Ring or the WBC.
    it's up to the CAC to reverse the decision, it's up to the WBC to order a rematch, but even if the WBC order's a rematch it's gonna be no shock if right after you hear that Dawson drops the title
    True, Dawson may just can the WBC belt, in a way, I wouldn't blame him. Really though, I believe a lot of boxing fans would want to see a rematch, and they wouldn't be happy if Dawson canned the belt.
    Chances are the CAC will make a ruling this week, so no telling what's going to happen.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    British Columbia, Canada
    Posts
    18,766
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4373
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Golden Boy files protest to Ring, WBC, and CAC, over the Hopkins ruling

    It should be a N/C, Hopkins should keep his belt, and an immediate rematch should be ordered.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    6,763
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1323
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Golden Boy files protest to Ring, WBC, and CAC, over the Hopkins ruling

    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Mars_ax View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Tam Seddon View Post
    It should be in Hopkins' favour, that was complete shit!
    If this had happened to someone else besides Hopkins, i'd probably give a shit. The thing is, either way, there needs to be a rematch ordered, this needs to get settled in the ring, ASAP, so we can get bored to tears again.

    Hopefully next time it won't be on PPV.
    thing is, if it's up to Dawson...there wont be a rematch cause he already bitched out of one
    Wait a minute. You are angry about Dawson's post fight actions. I get it. Don't forget there was a while there where Hopkins wouldn't fight Dawson. Let's see how interested in the rematch Hopkins is too. Also, I'm not sure there is a desire by the boxing public to see them in the ring again after what happened.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    6,763
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1323
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Golden Boy files protest to Ring, WBC, and CAC, over the Hopkins ruling

    This fight should and will be ruled a no contest. It reminds of the Nate Campbell/Tim Bradley fight a little while back that was called a win by Bradley but later changed to a no contest.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    3
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Golden Boy files protest to Ring, WBC, and CAC, over the Hopkins ruling

    Chad lets give this guy Hopkins a rematch you have the ability to kick his ass
    Then you can go for Pascal

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    4,528
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1395
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Golden Boy files protest to Ring, WBC, and CAC, over the Hopkins ruling

    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    This fight should and will be ruled a no contest. It reminds of the Nate Campbell/Tim Bradley fight a little while back that was called a win by Bradley but later changed to a no contest.

    Yeah and Rahman and Toney was originally a TKO for Toney too but theychanged that to a NC aswel.

    It will be a travesty if they dont do the same with the Hopkins - Dawson fight.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    6,903
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Golden Boy files protest to Ring, WBC, and CAC, over the Hopkins ruling

    Quote Originally Posted by GAME View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    This fight should and will be ruled a no contest. It reminds of the Nate Campbell/Tim Bradley fight a little while back that was called a win by Bradley but later changed to a no contest.

    Yeah and Rahman and Toney was originally a TKO for Toney too but theychanged that to a NC aswel.

    It will be a travesty if they dont do the same with the Hopkins - Dawson fight.
    I don't know about a travesty, Hopkins had already 'leaned' on and pushed Dawson down to the canvas earlier in the fight, when Hopkins tried to do the same shit again Dawson retaliated. Nobody seems to remember that Hopkins was doing something illegal before Dawson pushed him off, Hopkins wasn't an "innocent victim" in all of this.

    That's just the way I see it, let the decision stand as is, (TKO -2 for Dawson), but order a rematch to settle it.
    Last edited by Mars_ax; 10-18-2011 at 09:49 PM.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3383
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Golden Boy files protest to Ring, WBC, and CAC, over the Hopkins ruling

    Quote Originally Posted by Mars_ax View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Tam Seddon View Post
    It should be in Hopkins' favour, that was complete shit!
    If this had happened to someone else besides Hopkins, i'd probably give a shit. The thing is, either way, there needs to be a rematch ordered, this needs to get settled in the ring, ASAP, so we can get bored to tears again.

    Hopefully next time it won't be on PPV.
    If you don't give a shit why are you creating threads about it?

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    6,903
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Golden Boy files protest to Ring, WBC, and CAC, over the Hopkins ruling

    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Mars_ax View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Tam Seddon View Post
    It should be in Hopkins' favour, that was complete shit!
    If this had happened to someone else besides Hopkins, i'd probably give a shit. The thing is, either way, there needs to be a rematch ordered, this needs to get settled in the ring, ASAP, so we can get bored to tears again.

    Hopefully next time it won't be on PPV.
    If you don't give a shit why are you creating threads about it?

    Not that I need to explain a fucking thing to you bilbo, but what I said was, I don't give a shit that Hopkins lost his titles. I created a thread about the pending ruling, because it's boxing news, what part of that confuses you?

    You seem to believe that everything I post is "stupid" so do yourself a favor, just don't read my Texas hick drivil, think you can handle that mate?
    Last edited by Mars_ax; 10-18-2011 at 03:55 AM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-17-2011, 10:24 PM
  2. No change in the ruling of Thompson-Arvin?
    By killersheep in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 09-16-2008, 05:27 AM
  3. Replies: 12
    Last Post: 03-15-2008, 12:50 PM
  4. NSAC Changes Diaz-Gomi Ruling From PRIDE To 'No Contest'
    By SalTheButcher in forum Mixed Martial Arts
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-14-2007, 11:48 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing