Was a ROBBERY Please look :D

[Gandalf]

such a passionate lot. lol

Do not join a fencefight with a pencil. Add your view. Who won and in which rounds and therefore pass judgement. But to do no other but make a snide comment is just......gay.

c'mon miles, it wasn't meant as a snide remark. i just thought that you've said your piece and other people have expressed their opinion and it's about time we should move on and respect each other's opinions. you don't have to resort to name calling. lol

this dear juan write-up sums up what i think about the whole deal. the only difference is the writer thought pacquiao won while i had it a draw.

Dear Juan Manuel Marquez | Michael D. Sellers

But he didn't win and the fact that no judge had him winning is a crime. It is like George Bush walking free. The guy is a war criminal and nobody has him and in the same sense Manny is a war criminal too, he is bound by the corruption which US territory seems to breed in. It's like the judges take corruption pills.

"We'll excuse him, he is our leader. We must make excuses" But the guy is a fraud. He lost.....again. And the worst thing is Manny himself not being able to admit he lost. He looked pathetic. After the fight and in the interview. What a politician, what a fraud.

[killersheep]

Just thought I'd add this little tid bit

http://www.rsc.org/pdf/pressoffice/2003/tea.pdf

[:::PSL:::]

Just thought I'd add this little tid bit

http://www.rsc.org/pdf/pressoffice/2003/tea.pdf

[ruthless rocco]

such a passionate lot. lol

Do not join a fencefight with a pencil. Add your view. Who won and in which rounds and therefore pass judgement. But to do no other but make a snide comment is just......gay.

c'mon miles, it wasn't meant as a snide remark. i just thought that you've said your piece and other people have expressed their opinion and it's about time we should move on and respect each other's opinions. you don't have to resort to name calling. lol

this dear juan write-up sums up what i think about the whole deal. the only difference is the writer thought pacquiao won while i had it a draw.

Dear Juan Manuel Marquez | Michael D. Sellers

But he didn't win and the fact that no judge had him winning is a crime. It is like George Bush walking free. The guy is a war criminal and nobody has him and in the same sense Manny is a war criminal too, he is bound by the corruption which US territory seems to breed in. It's like the judges take corruption pills.

"We'll excuse him, he is our leader. We must make excuses" But the guy is a fraud. He lost.....again. And the worst thing is Manny himself not being able to admit he lost. He looked pathetic. After the fight and in the interview. What a politician, what a fraud.

just another example of miles demonstrating what douchey drama queen he is.
miles you should take up masterbating or banging dudes (again)...you clearly have alot of pent up frustration and misdirected energy.

[ICB]

Well in my opinion it was a robbery, i've watched it twice and had it 8-4 and 7-4-1. I don't care what anyother so called expert says i go with my own opinion, im not saying its the right opinion. But my opinion is in the majority that JMM won.

[:::PSL:::]

Well in my opinion it was a robbery, i've watched it twice and had it 8-4 and 7-4-1. I don't care what anyother so called expert says i go with my own opinion, im not saying its the right opinion. But my opinion is in the majority that JMM won.

That don't really explain why it was robbery.

[ICB]

Well in my opinion it was a robbery, i've watched it twice and had it 8-4 and 7-4-1. I don't care what anyother so called expert says i go with my own opinion, im not saying its the right opinion. But my opinion is in the majority that JMM won.

That don't really explain why it was robbery.

I've gave my reason's in many of the other threads, atleast i don't use "foot stomper". Or how about Manny Pacquiao having point deducted for hitting JMM while he was down in 1st fight ?

[:::PSL:::]

Well in my opinion it was a robbery, i've watched it twice and had it 8-4 and 7-4-1. I don't care what anyother so called expert says i go with my own opinion, im not saying its the right opinion. But my opinion is in the majority that JMM won.

That don't really explain why it was robbery.

I've gave my reason's in many of the other threads, atleast i don't use "foot stomper". Or how about Manny Pacquiao having point deducted for hitting JMM while he was down in 1st fight ?

Lol! What reason? Where? What thread?

Explaining why JMM should of won the fight is one thing. Explaining how he got robbed is another.

[miron_lang]

I've gave my reason's in many of the other threads, atleast i don't use "foot stomper". Or how about Manny Pacquiao having point deducted for hitting JMM while he was down in 1st fight ?

He was hanging by the rope mate he's not down, its fair game.

[ICB]

I've gave my reason's in many of the other threads, atleast i don't use "foot stomper". Or how about Manny Pacquiao having point deducted for hitting JMM while he was down in 1st fight ?

He was hanging by the rope mate he's not down, its fair game.

I was being sarcastic.

[Gandalf]

such a passionate lot. lol

Do not join a fencefight with a pencil. Add your view. Who won and in which rounds and therefore pass judgement. But to do no other but make a snide comment is just......gay.

c'mon miles, it wasn't meant as a snide remark. i just thought that you've said your piece and other people have expressed their opinion and it's about time we should move on and respect each other's opinions. you don't have to resort to name calling. lol

this dear juan write-up sums up what i think about the whole deal. the only difference is the writer thought pacquiao won while i had it a draw.

Dear Juan Manuel Marquez | Michael D. Sellers

But he didn't win and the fact that no judge had him winning is a crime. It is like George Bush walking free. The guy is a war criminal and nobody has him and in the same sense Manny is a war criminal too, he is bound by the corruption which US territory seems to breed in. It's like the judges take corruption pills.

"We'll excuse him, he is our leader. We must make excuses" But the guy is a fraud. He lost.....again. And the worst thing is Manny himself not being able to admit he lost. He looked pathetic. After the fight and in the interview. What a politician, what a fraud.

just another example of miles demonstrating what douchey drama queen he is.
miles you should take up masterbating or banging dudes (again)...you clearly have alot of pent up frustration and misdirected energy.

Or listen to arguably the worst sounds out there as a distraction. Stop being a bitch.

Manny is a corrupt little bastard and it feeds not only into his politics but boxing too. Corruption is a way of life to someone like Pacquiao and as long as he does a little prayer he thinks it is justified.

[miron_lang]

Manny is a corrupt little bastard and it feeds not only into his politics but boxing too. Corruption is a way of life to someone like Pacquiao and as long as he does a little prayer he thinks it is justified.

That could be true but in no way related to Pacquiao winning the fight.

If all rounds were like round 5. Then marquez was robbed but instead Pacquiao won a close decision win again.

[fan johnny]

All the crybaby talk in the world won't change the fact that Marquez lost. Just the same as he lost to Chris John.

No matter how many times Marquez almost wins. He will still be the _____.

But go ahead and make t=shirts that says. "I beat Pacquiao 3 times."

[ElTerribleMorales]

so funny to see that the ones that are still wound up tighter than a slinky are the few Pactard rejects who are likely to kill themselves when Mayweather knocks Pacquiao the fuck out, kinda like the Michael Jackson fans

[:::PSL:::]

All the crybaby talk in the world won't change the fact that Marquez lost. Just the same as he lost to Chris John.

No matter how many times Marquez almost wins. He will still be the _____.

But go ahead and make t=shirts that says. "I beat Pacquiao 3 times."

No matter how they bitch, moan, and cry,... they won't change what's already recorded in the book.