Was a ROBBERY Please look :D

[ICB]

Well in my opinion it was a robbery, i've watched it twice and had it 8-4 and 7-4-1. I don't care what anyother so called expert says i go with my own opinion, im not saying its the right opinion. But my opinion is in the majority that JMM won.

That don't really explain why it was robbery.

I've gave my reason's in many of the other threads, atleast i don't use "foot stomper". Or how about Manny Pacquiao having point deducted for hitting JMM while he was down in 1st fight ?

[:::PSL:::]

Well in my opinion it was a robbery, i've watched it twice and had it 8-4 and 7-4-1. I don't care what anyother so called expert says i go with my own opinion, im not saying its the right opinion. But my opinion is in the majority that JMM won.

That don't really explain why it was robbery.

I've gave my reason's in many of the other threads, atleast i don't use "foot stomper". Or how about Manny Pacquiao having point deducted for hitting JMM while he was down in 1st fight ?

Lol! What reason? Where? What thread?

Explaining why JMM should of won the fight is one thing. Explaining how he got robbed is another.

[miron_lang]

I've gave my reason's in many of the other threads, atleast i don't use "foot stomper". Or how about Manny Pacquiao having point deducted for hitting JMM while he was down in 1st fight ?

He was hanging by the rope mate he's not down, its fair game.

[ICB]

I've gave my reason's in many of the other threads, atleast i don't use "foot stomper". Or how about Manny Pacquiao having point deducted for hitting JMM while he was down in 1st fight ?

He was hanging by the rope mate he's not down, its fair game.

I was being sarcastic.