Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 166

Thread: Joe Calzaghe: Andre Ward is good but beatable

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    12,254
    Mentioned
    159 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2468
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Calzaghe: Andre Ward is good but beatable

    Quote Originally Posted by Gandalf View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    I think the opinion was that if Froch won the super six, his legacy would be better than that of Calzaghe. This was a thread we discussed in depth , well didnt Ward win the super six ?

    Ward beat a much better opposition than Calzaghe , how can Mr Play it safe find fault with Ward.
    Isnt a fool wise after the event.
    Who though? I really don't see anyone on Ward's resume that is better than the best fighters on Calzaghe's resume. It doesn't make any sense.
    You dont think Ward has fought better opposition than Calzaghe at the same stage of their respective careers ?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    49,121
    Mentioned
    950 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Calzaghe: Andre Ward is good but beatable

    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Gandalf View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    I think the opinion was that if Froch won the super six, his legacy would be better than that of Calzaghe. This was a thread we discussed in depth , well didnt Ward win the super six ?

    Ward beat a much better opposition than Calzaghe , how can Mr Play it safe find fault with Ward.
    Isnt a fool wise after the event.
    Who though? I really don't see anyone on Ward's resume that is better than the best fighters on Calzaghe's resume. It doesn't make any sense.
    You dont think Ward has fought better opposition than Calzaghe at the same stage of their respective careers ?
    Calzaghe - Eubank, Reid, Woodhall, Veit, Sheika

    Ward - Green, Abraham, Froch, Kessler, Miranda

    There isn't all that much in it. Eubank was faded, so was Kessler. People are going to remember Green and Miranda just as much as they do Sheika and Woodhall. Abraham and Veit are your token popular in Germany fighters. Reid was a good fighter though never going to go down as a great, a bit like Froch who only beat a well faded Reid.

    The only difference was Calzaghe was busier and had more filler.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    12,254
    Mentioned
    159 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2468
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Calzaghe: Andre Ward is good but beatable

    Quote Originally Posted by Gandalf View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Gandalf View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    I think the opinion was that if Froch won the super six, his legacy would be better than that of Calzaghe. This was a thread we discussed in depth , well didnt Ward win the super six ?

    Ward beat a much better opposition than Calzaghe , how can Mr Play it safe find fault with Ward.
    Isnt a fool wise after the event.
    Who though? I really don't see anyone on Ward's resume that is better than the best fighters on Calzaghe's resume. It doesn't make any sense.
    You dont think Ward has fought better opposition than Calzaghe at the same stage of their respective careers ?
    Calzaghe - Eubank, Reid, Woodhall, Veit, Sheika

    Ward - Green, Abraham, Froch, Kessler, Miranda

    There isn't all that much in it. Eubank was faded, so was Kessler. People are going to remember Green and Miranda just as much as they do Sheika and Woodhall. Abraham and Veit are your token popular in Germany fighters. Reid was a good fighter though never going to go down as a great, a bit like Froch who only beat a well faded Reid.

    The only difference was Calzaghe was busier and had more filler.
    You mean had alot of defences against club fighters ?

    Sheika had lost to ( 28 -44 -7 ) Tony Booth for fucks sake.
    Last edited by Dark Lord Al; 12-21-2011 at 02:38 PM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3120
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Calzaghe: Andre Ward is good but beatable

    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Gandalf View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Gandalf View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    I think the opinion was that if Froch won the super six, his legacy would be better than that of Calzaghe. This was a thread we discussed in depth , well didnt Ward win the super six ?

    Ward beat a much better opposition than Calzaghe , how can Mr Play it safe find fault with Ward.
    Isnt a fool wise after the event.
    Who though? I really don't see anyone on Ward's resume that is better than the best fighters on Calzaghe's resume. It doesn't make any sense.
    You dont think Ward has fought better opposition than Calzaghe at the same stage of their respective careers ?
    Calzaghe - Eubank, Reid, Woodhall, Veit, Sheika

    Ward - Green, Abraham, Froch, Kessler, Miranda

    There isn't all that much in it. Eubank was faded, so was Kessler. People are going to remember Green and Miranda just as much as they do Sheika and Woodhall. Abraham and Veit are your token popular in Germany fighters. Reid was a good fighter though never going to go down as a great, a bit like Froch who only beat a well faded Reid.

    The only difference was Calzaghe was busier and had more filler.
    You mean had alot of defences against club fighters ?

    Sheika had lost to Tony Booth for fucks sake.
    Yet beaten Glen Johnson.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    49,121
    Mentioned
    950 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Calzaghe: Andre Ward is good but beatable

    Ward potentially might end up with a better resume than Calzaghe, but anything more right now is just premature and I don't think he will be able to last the course. Let me know if Ward is still around and unbeaten at 36. It is just not going to happen.

    To do more than Calzaghe means defending his titles year in year out and then taking on LHW. He has a lot more to do and I have a hard time seeing it.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3120
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Calzaghe: Andre Ward is good but beatable

    Quote Originally Posted by Gandalf View Post
    Ward potentially might end up with a better resume than Calzaghe, but anything more right now is just premature and I don't think he will be able to last the course. Let me know if Ward is still around and unbeaten at 36. It is just not going to happen.

    To do more than Calzaghe means defending his titles year in year out and then taking on LHW. He has a lot more to do and I have a hard time seeing it.
    Yeah spot on. Ward has the potential but a long way to go yet. He hasn't even conclusively proved to be THE best Supermiddleweight yet. I believe most people have Bute rated no.2?

    Not too long ago it was very common to read "Pavlik has a better resume than Calzaghe." One drubbing later - to a Calzaghe victim - and the poor guy is a bum that no longer warrants a mention.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    12,254
    Mentioned
    159 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2468
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Calzaghe: Andre Ward is good but beatable

    Quote Originally Posted by Gandalf View Post
    Ward potentially might end up with a better resume than Calzaghe, but anything more right now is just premature and I don't think he will be able to last the course. Let me know if Ward is still around and unbeaten at 36. It is just not going to happen.

    To do more than Calzaghe means defending his titles year in year out and then taking on LHW. He has a lot more to do and I have a hard time seeing it.
    If Ward hooks up with Warren for the most part of his career , i think there a good chance he will end up unbeaten , maybe when Calzaghe is 41 , Ward will try to get a fight with him to define his destiny?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    18,672
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Calzaghe: Andre Ward is good but beatable

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Gandalf View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Gandalf View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    I think the opinion was that if Froch won the super six, his legacy would be better than that of Calzaghe. This was a thread we discussed in depth , well didnt Ward win the super six ?

    Ward beat a much better opposition than Calzaghe , how can Mr Play it safe find fault with Ward.
    Isnt a fool wise after the event.
    Who though? I really don't see anyone on Ward's resume that is better than the best fighters on Calzaghe's resume. It doesn't make any sense.
    You dont think Ward has fought better opposition than Calzaghe at the same stage of their respective careers ?
    Calzaghe - Eubank, Reid, Woodhall, Veit, Sheika

    Ward - Green, Abraham, Froch, Kessler, Miranda

    There isn't all that much in it. Eubank was faded, so was Kessler. People are going to remember Green and Miranda just as much as they do Sheika and Woodhall. Abraham and Veit are your token popular in Germany fighters. Reid was a good fighter though never going to go down as a great, a bit like Froch who only beat a well faded Reid.

    The only difference was Calzaghe was busier and had more filler.
    You mean had alot of defences against club fighters ?

    Sheika had lost to Tony Booth for fucks sake.
    Yet beaten Glen Johnson.
    The Glen Johnson, Calzaghe was deadly afraid to face.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    236
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    714
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Calzaghe: Andre Ward is good but beatable

    Firstly, with respect to anyone who thinks that a second Froch-Ward fight would go any differently, Froch doesn't even think he could beat Ward. He's already said that he's the second-best 168-pounder, and that nobody can beat Ward at 168.

    Secondly, it's a myth that Calzaghe cleaned out the 168-pound division. He beat many good fighters, but there were A LOT of top contenders that for one reason or another, he never took on. Pick up a random Ring Magazine from the Calzaghe era, and you'll see a lot of names in the top-5 of the 168-pound division that Calzaghe never got in the ring with. That doesn't mean that he wouldn't have beaten them; but it's just patently false that he beat all of the big names in the division.

    Thirdly, since the Calzaghe fight, with the exception of the Ward fight, Kessler is 5-0 (4), including a solid win against the division's #3. So it's bullshit to discount Ward's victory by saying that Kessler is somehow markedly worse than he was against Calzaghe; it's just that Ward made him LOOK bad. The 2011 Ward is better than ANY year's Kessler, and Calzaghe, while he beat him decisively, hardly "destroyed" him. To say that Ward hasn't done against anyone else the types of things that he would need to go to beat Calzaghe misses the point; it doesn't imply that Ward is incapable of doing those things. He just hasn't needed to do them against anyone else. What Ward has shown is that to date, he can do whatever is needed to beat the people put in front of him. That doesn't mean that he necessarily would be able to adjust successfully against Calzaghe, but there's no particular reason to think that he wouldn't, either. IMO, 2011 Ward vs. (insert your favorite 168-pound year here) Calzaghe would be a close, competitive, and highly entertaining fight.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Essex Mafia
    Posts
    14,712
    Mentioned
    27 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2426
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Calzaghe: Andre Ward is good but beatable

    Quote Originally Posted by LobowolfXXX View Post
    Firstly, with respect to anyone who thinks that a second Froch-Ward fight would go any differently, Froch doesn't even think he could beat Ward. He's already said that he's the second-best 168-pounder, and that nobody can beat Ward at 168.

    Secondly, it's a myth that Calzaghe cleaned out the 168-pound division. He beat many good fighters, but there were A LOT of top contenders that for one reason or another, he never took on. Pick up a random Ring Magazine from the Calzaghe era, and you'll see a lot of names in the top-5 of the 168-pound division that Calzaghe never got in the ring with. That doesn't mean that he wouldn't have beaten them; but it's just patently false that he beat all of the big names in the division.

    Thirdly, since the Calzaghe fight, with the exception of the Ward fight, Kessler is 5-0 (4), including a solid win against the division's #3. So it's bullshit to discount Ward's victory by saying that Kessler is somehow markedly worse than he was against Calzaghe; it's just that Ward made him LOOK bad. The 2011 Ward is better than ANY year's Kessler, and Calzaghe, while he beat him decisively, hardly "destroyed" him. To say that Ward hasn't done against anyone else the types of things that he would need to go to beat Calzaghe misses the point; it doesn't imply that Ward is incapable of doing those things. He just hasn't needed to do them against anyone else. What Ward has shown is that to date, he can do whatever is needed to beat the people put in front of him. That doesn't mean that he necessarily would be able to adjust successfully against Calzaghe, but there's no particular reason to think that he wouldn't, either. IMO, 2011 Ward vs. (insert your favorite 168-pound year here) Calzaghe would be a close, competitive, and highly entertaining fight.

    Actually mate, your comment is 'The Myth' - this is a point that has been debated over and over on here. You tell me who Calzaghe should've fought at 168, that was operating at 168 at that time, and that the reason they didn't fight was JC!!

    Andplease don't say Liles, Echols, Mundine and all that old blurb.
    God is a concept, By which we can measure, Our pain, I'll say it again, God is a concept, By which we can measure, Our pain, I don't believe in magic, I don't believe in I-ching, I don't believe in bible, I don't believe in tarot, I don't believe in Hitler, I don't believe in Jesus, I don't believe in Kennedy, I don't believe in Buddha, I don't believe in mantra, I don't believe in Gita, I don't believe in yoga, I don't believe in kings, I don't believe in Elvis, I don't believe in Zimmerman, I don't believe in Beatles, I just believe in me!!


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3120
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Calzaghe: Andre Ward is good but beatable

    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Gandalf View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Gandalf View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    I think the opinion was that if Froch won the super six, his legacy would be better than that of Calzaghe. This was a thread we discussed in depth , well didnt Ward win the super six ?

    Ward beat a much better opposition than Calzaghe , how can Mr Play it safe find fault with Ward.
    Isnt a fool wise after the event.
    Who though? I really don't see anyone on Ward's resume that is better than the best fighters on Calzaghe's resume. It doesn't make any sense.
    You dont think Ward has fought better opposition than Calzaghe at the same stage of their respective careers ?
    Calzaghe - Eubank, Reid, Woodhall, Veit, Sheika

    Ward - Green, Abraham, Froch, Kessler, Miranda

    There isn't all that much in it. Eubank was faded, so was Kessler. People are going to remember Green and Miranda just as much as they do Sheika and Woodhall. Abraham and Veit are your token popular in Germany fighters. Reid was a good fighter though never going to go down as a great, a bit like Froch who only beat a well faded Reid.

    The only difference was Calzaghe was busier and had more filler.
    You mean had alot of defences against club fighters ?

    Sheika had lost to Tony Booth for fucks sake.
    Yet beaten Glen Johnson.
    The Glen Johnson, Calzaghe was deadly afraid to face.
    Yep the same Glen Johnson that Sheika had just beat before Calzaghe smashed him all over the ring.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Andre Ward
    By terrorsid in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 12-12-2011, 05:28 PM
  2. Andre ward hahahahahaha
    By Dropanuke in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 07-10-2011, 09:58 PM
  3. Was just talking about andre ward....
    By Mar in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-23-2008, 10:20 PM
  4. Look out Andre Ward
    By Vessel in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-06-2006, 07:42 AM
  5. andre ward fight?
    By hollo3255 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-03-2006, 09:23 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing