Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
"Froch would have won the Kessler fight if it was anywhere other than Denmark." - was a reply to your comments about froch losing to dirrell, to highlight how that is your opinion, i then went on to say that the only thing that matters in either fight is the judges

"Ward definitely wouldn't have won the tournament if he had fought the same schedule as Froch." - i never said definately, i said i think we might have a different champ, this conversation continued to you asking me who would have beaten ward, a question i answered, and i then suggested that the odds would be against ward staying unbeaten with a string of fights like those froch had which you failed to reply to

Read your posts back, the smw division is rubbish, kessler and froch are b level fighters, cummon man, i have proved to be objective and you to be biast in this thread

Ward is a good fighter, he has beaten kessler and froch all be it both in home fixtures still very good results. He has also had some good wins over the second tier of the division, he isnt yet in the supreme class as the hype seems to be putting him
You have stated opinions, as have I. Read your own posts back, including the one I'm responding to right now -- it's all opinion. By definition, subjective. And the word is "biased," not "biast." (Objectively true - not just my opinion.) Second time you've done that.

Just because I disagree with your subjective opinions does not transform them into objective facts or render mine biased. Your position is simply that your own opinions are always necessarily deeply and objectively true. Ironically, this is itself an example of bias. (Also the reason why arguing with you is pointless, so this will be my last post on this. I am well aware that you will jump on with more sophistry to have the last word.)