The moronic scores for Ward-Froch suggest it was a close fight when in reality it wasn't. There shouldn't be a rematch but I can easily see Froch pushing for one using the scores to support his case.
 |
|
|
|
Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Banned
Array
Re: Hearn says showtime rejects Froch - Bute...
The moronic scores for Ward-Froch suggest it was a close fight when in reality it wasn't. There shouldn't be a rematch but I can easily see Froch pushing for one using the scores to support his case.
Old Guard
Array
Re: Hearn says showtime rejects Froch - Bute...
Froch doesn't deserve a rematch against Ward at this momment in time and he should be trying to keep well away from one. I was talking about Froch - Bute saying if the fight wasnt at all close there wouldn't be a rematch that was part of the agreement.Originally Posted by Violent Demise
Banned
Array
Re: Hearn says showtime rejects Froch - Bute...
I'm talking about the same thing. Using Ward-Froch as an example. Which was a lopsided fight deemed close by moronic scorecards. Do they rematch than?Froch doesn't deserve a rematch against Ward at this momment in time and he should be trying to keep well away from one. I was talking about Froch - Bute saying if the fight wasnt at all close there wouldn't be a rematch that was part of the agreement.
Old Guard
Array
Re: Hearn says showtime rejects Froch - Bute...
No because a rematch clause to my knowledge wasn't part of the inital contracted deal.I'm talking about the same thing. Using Ward-Froch as an example. Which was a lopsided fight deemed close by moronic scorecards. Do they rematch than?Froch doesn't deserve a rematch against Ward at this momment in time and he should be trying to keep well away from one. I was talking about Froch - Bute saying if the fight wasnt at all close there wouldn't be a rematch that was part of the agreement.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks