Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 17 of 17

Thread: I don't like catch weight

Share/Bookmark
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    6,763
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1314
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: I don't like catch weight

    Quote Originally Posted by Ant Live View Post
    Some fights needs to be made at any cost. But I agree, catchweight should be a non-title fight only.

    Fights that need to be made . . .
    1. Martinez vs Ward. Martinez has don't really fit as a middleweight. So for him to go up to 168 will probably kill him. Ward been at 168 almost his while career. I even think he fought over 168. So getting down to 160 will kill him. 164 is the middle ground.

    2. Martinez vs Mayweather. No catchweight IMO, but a meet in the middle at 154 should work.

    CAtchweights that should never have been.
    Pacman vs Cotto
    Pacman vs JMM
    I simply don't understand those catchweight fights



    As far as Mosley vs Khan, Mosley said he won't drop past 147. So Khan needs to come all the way up to 147. Besides Shane's power, Khan should win at any weight. If Shane hit Khan the way he hit Floyd, GOODNIGHT!!!!
    Ant makes a good point in that catch weights are somewhat suspect when they are used as an advantage for one of the participants, but make more sense when used as the only way to make a fight. There is no reason for Floyd to face Martinez at 150 other than to have an advantage over Martinez because Floyd has fought at 154 with success in the past. There was no reason for Pacquiao to fight Cotto at 145 either for that matter.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Up in the attic
    Posts
    26,468
    Mentioned
    448 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4169
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: I don't like catch weight

    Quote Originally Posted by Althugz View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Some catch weights make sense just to even the fight a bit like JCC and Whitaker, others are a joke and just unfair.
    I agree that some special attraction fights need a catch weight - Just that no title should ever really be on the line if you're not letting your opponent come in at the limit.
    Both these points make perfect sense.
    Hidden Content " border="0" />

    I can explain it.
    But I cant understand it for you.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. WARD V. MARTINEZ - possible at catch-weight
    By shza in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 01-01-2012, 09:27 PM
  2. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-20-2009, 11:15 AM
  3. Catch Weight - Title fight?
    By fan johnny in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 71
    Last Post: 06-07-2009, 02:57 PM
  4. Hopkins should fight Pavlik at a catch weight.
    By Taeth in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 49
    Last Post: 10-08-2007, 04:21 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing