
Originally Posted by
ruthless rocco

Originally Posted by
TitoFan

Originally Posted by
ruthless rocco
i doubt we agree...
i think martinez is massively overrated; whereas i find chavez jr to be well managed.
Oh ok.... so we disagree.
I don't care to defend Martinez. He needs a couple of career-defining fights to establish his legacy, if there's going to be any.
As for Baby Chavez, if by "well managed" you mean protected from any fights that might endanger his precious little "0" in the loss column, to the point of ducking credible challengers. Then yeah..... the coddled little baby is well managed.

by well managed i mean he's made the most money with the least risk while upholding a brand name started by his dad.
that's the third element of the sweet science...the one people don't like to talk about
: money.
the art of hitting and not being hit; while making as much money as possible.
I can now see why we will always disagree.
I see boxing as a sport. A sport I've loved for a very long time. Long enough to have seen the best fighting the best. Long enough to have seen warriors in the ring, wanting to fight the best opponents available... and not giving a rat's ass about "brand names" (give me a frigging break), maintaining fake undefeated records, or wanting to bloat their bullshit records with bums.
You, on the other hand, admire "well managed" fighters with all the attributes you very well mentioned in your post. Nothing wrong with that...... to each his own.
We'll never agree.

Bookmarks