Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 132

Thread: Lamont Peterson positive for Taking drugs? Khan fight off????

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    6,763
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1339
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Lamont Peterson positive for Taking drugs? Khan fight off????

    Here is an article I just found that is helpful to understanding Peterson's culpability. In sum, the commissioner said that Peterson broke multiple rules. First and foremost, synthetic testosterone is a banned substance. However, if its use is disclosed to the commission in a timely manner, and the commission implements an indepdent review by its own medical professionals, it will in certain cases permit its use if it finds due cause. In such a case, he would be granted a therapeutic-use exemption. [One would assume that in such an instance, if it were permitted, the other side would be made aware of its use.] Therefore, Peterson violated the rules because (1) he used a banned substance, (2) failed to disclose the use of the banned substance to the Commission, and (3) failed a VADA test.

    Thus, irrespective of the merit behind his use of the substance, it is a banned substance, which has to be obvious. In this day and age, anytime you are supplementing your body with more testosterone, questions will arise. What really does Peterson in here is that he failed to inform the Commission of his use of the banned substance. Why would you think Peterson would choose not to inform the commmission? The cynic might say that one reason is that his claim of low testosterone was false and he didn't believe he would be granted a therapeutic use exemption, or that he didn't want to draw any scrutiny to himself that would come with a independent review board examining his records because of what would then might be uncovered.

    I have read elsewhere, but not confirmed by a reliable source, that he first took the substance three weeks before Khan-Peterson I. He travelled from D.C. to Vegas to get the testosterone treatment from a small, somewhat notoriously shady, clinic. He didn't report his use of testosterone to the D.C. commission either. Clearly, if that was the case, he was aware that he was supplementing with synthetic testosterone.

    On a side note, Peterson actaully passed the Nevada drug test because his testosterone ratio was 3.77-1. He failed the VADA test because it also tests for synthetic testosterone, which is what he was taking.

    NSAC's Kizer Discusses Peterson Scandal, License Issue - Boxing News

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    2,099
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1132
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    On a side note, Peterson actaully passed the Nevada drug test because his testosterone ratio was 3.77-1. He failed the VADA test because it also tests for synthetic testosterone, which is what he
    Haha I hope this shows how utterly ridiculous the Nevada state commisions drug testing is. I can not believe more people didn't give Team Pac more hell when they were trying to avoid it with excuses like "nobody is bigger than the sport, we'll do what the commision says". Pathetic.

    As an aside I think it's ridiculous that you're not allowed to supplement with synthetic testosterone to even up your natural test levels if you are low. So if Khan was up at 6 and Peterson was at 1..how fair is it that he is not allowed to even that up to within range?

    It's made even more ridiculous that he would probably be allowed to supplement with things like Tribulus and ZMA to increase testosterone just because they are over the counter supplements.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,881
    Mentioned
    1703 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3137
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Lamont Peterson positive for Taking drugs? Khan fight off????

    Khan is over stating his case about how heavy Peterson was for the first fight and that the fight should be a no contest and that he should have his titles back. He is trying to turn back time and make people forget that he lost the fight.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    3,571
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    942
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Khan is over stating his case about how heavy Peterson was for the first fight and that the fight should be a no contest and that he should have his titles back. He is trying to turn back time and make people forget that he lost the fight.
    I think it is going to work.



    It's a banned substance, he knew it, everyone knew it, they just thought they would get away with it. Khan is doing what you would expect Khan to do, scream like a bratty girl and demand he got his status back.

    Whether or not it should be banned is a different question. The fact is he knocked back loads of different supplements and pills and shakes when training. It's all chemically boosting stuff, topping up your mojo doesn't suddenly make you invincible.

    I always picture Floyd hanging out with 50 Cent and the gang getting stoned. Not sure how he gets away with not getting caught smoking spliffs!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,881
    Mentioned
    1703 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3137
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Lamont Peterson positive for Taking drugs? Khan fight off????

    Quote Originally Posted by 0james0 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Khan is over stating his case about how heavy Peterson was for the first fight and that the fight should be a no contest and that he should have his titles back. He is trying to turn back time and make people forget that he lost the fight.
    I think it is going to work.



    It's a banned substance, he knew it, everyone knew it, they just thought they would get away with it. Khan is doing what you would expect Khan to do, scream like a bratty girl and demand he got his status back.

    Whether or not it should be banned is a different question. The fact is he knocked back loads of different supplements and pills and shakes when training. It's all chemically boosting stuff, topping up your mojo doesn't suddenly make you invincible.

    I always picture Floyd hanging out with 50 Cent and the gang getting stoned. Not sure how he gets away with not getting caught smoking spliffs!
    I do not think Floyd smokes any substances.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    3,571
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    942
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by 0james0 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Khan is over stating his case about how heavy Peterson was for the first fight and that the fight should be a no contest and that he should have his titles back. He is trying to turn back time and make people forget that he lost the fight.
    I think it is going to work.



    It's a banned substance, he knew it, everyone knew it, they just thought they would get away with it. Khan is doing what you would expect Khan to do, scream like a bratty girl and demand he got his status back.

    Whether or not it should be banned is a different question. The fact is he knocked back loads of different supplements and pills and shakes when training. It's all chemically boosting stuff, topping up your mojo doesn't suddenly make you invincible.

    I always picture Floyd hanging out with 50 Cent and the gang getting stoned. Not sure how he gets away with not getting caught smoking spliffs!
    I do not think Floyd smokes any substances.
    Nope me neither. I'm joking.

    It's probably heroin.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    The Bay Area
    Posts
    14,471
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2930
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Lamont Peterson positive for Taking drugs? Khan fight off????

    Quote Originally Posted by Althugz View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    On a side note, Peterson actaully passed the Nevada drug test because his testosterone ratio was 3.77-1. He failed the VADA test because it also tests for synthetic testosterone, which is what he
    Haha I hope this shows how utterly ridiculous the Nevada state commisions drug testing is. I can not believe more people didn't give Team Pac more hell when they were trying to avoid it with excuses like "nobody is bigger than the sport, we'll do what the commision says". Pathetic.

    As an aside I think it's ridiculous that you're not allowed to supplement with synthetic testosterone to even up your natural test levels if you are low. So if Khan was up at 6 and Peterson was at 1..how fair is it that he is not allowed to even that up to within range?

    It's made even more ridiculous that he would probably be allowed to supplement with things like Tribulus and ZMA to increase testosterone just because they are over the counter supplements.
    The Nevada State Athletic commission is a Government organization. It's by far the best commission in boxing imo but it's not really possible for them to capably test for synthetic testosterone which is why they have absolutely embraced outside organizations handling drug testing. It's not exactly cheap and I don't know about Nevada, but California tests onsite. That means they are using their own equipment and administrators, paid for by the state to handle fighter testing. I would imagine Nevada is the same. A government organization probably isn't going to spend millions of dollars to test for HGH (which can be done now) and synthetic testosterone. It's the same lab they are processing post office workers' samples! They test for the big 5 street drugs and than a small assortment of steroids. That's about it. No reason to bash on the NSAC, they do a great job but even they would concede (I would imagine) that this is best handled by a third party.

    Shame, shame, shame on Peterson. Stupid. I was really, really looking forward to the rematch too and I am a big fan of both Petersons.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    2,099
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1132
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    I'm not bashing the NSAC - truth is though, that in a sport like boxing, their tests fall pathetically short.

    My main gripe is how people used the NSAC to safeguard Pac when the excuses were flying thick and fast about why Floyds demands were ridiculous "rules are rules - Floyd isn't bigger than the sport blah blah".

    Just pure redundant arguements proven by this Khan vs Peterson fiasco.

    It costs more money for random, comprehensive drug tests but in the long-term every commisions interest should be to safeguard the fighters that bring in such a healthy income to their state, especially Nevada. They'd lose more money long term by NOT safeguarding their fighters if something goes wrong.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    6,763
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1339
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Lamont Peterson positive for Taking drugs? Khan fight off????

    Quote Originally Posted by Althugz View Post
    I'm not bashing the NSAC - truth is though, that in a sport like boxing, their tests fall pathetically short.

    My main gripe is how people used the NSAC to safeguard Pac when the excuses were flying thick and fast about why Floyds demands were ridiculous "rules are rules - Floyd isn't bigger than the sport blah blah".

    Just pure redundant arguements proven by this Khan vs Peterson fiasco.

    It costs more money for random, comprehensive drug tests but in the long-term every commisions interest should be to safeguard the fighters that bring in such a healthy income to their state, especially Nevada. They'd lose more money long term by NOT safeguarding their fighters if something goes wrong.
    I'm a little surprised Flyod hasn't made a bigger deal about Peterson's failed test. One would think he would be all over it. It seems like the perfect opportunity for Floyd to point out the flaws of the current drug testing. Now that I think about it, has Floyd ever stated that the Nevada testing is inadequate? Or has he tiptoed around criticizing the Nevada Commission? Do you think Floyd's reaction would have been different if Khan had failed the test?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    North Wales
    Posts
    9,844
    Mentioned
    392 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    982
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Lamont Peterson positive for Taking drugs? Khan fight off????

    People that cheat in sport's find more sophisticated way's to cheat it's a war keeping one step ahead,
    of not being caught. If they can getaway with it they will we are talking about a professional sport's
    man here, he's taking the piss I'm sorry I was stupid so if you act fuck in gormless you get away with murder. Do any of you lot remember Jackanory you do it starts next week guest stories by L Peterson.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    2,099
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1132
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Althugz View Post
    I'm not bashing the NSAC - truth is though, that in a sport like boxing, their tests fall pathetically short.

    My main gripe is how people used the NSAC to safeguard Pac when the excuses were flying thick and fast about why Floyds demands were ridiculous "rules are rules - Floyd isn't bigger than the sport blah blah".

    Just pure redundant arguements proven by this Khan vs Peterson fiasco.

    It costs more money for random, comprehensive drug tests but in the long-term every commisions interest should be to safeguard the fighters that bring in such a healthy income to their state, especially Nevada. They'd lose more money long term by NOT safeguarding their fighters if something goes wrong.
    Or has he tiptoed around criticizing the Nevada Commission? Do you think Floyd's reaction would have been different if Khan had failed the test?
    I doubt it's high on his priority list right now as he prepares to be locked up..and he's just come out of a fairly gruelling fight. I think boxing is the furthest thing from his mind at this point whether it was Khan who failed it or Peterson. Let's just say that I think he'd have more "motivation" to give an opinion if Khan had been caught

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    12,748
    Mentioned
    175 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1361
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Lamont Peterson positive for Taking drugs? Khan fight off????

    I notice that Khan has only said that he's disappointed and was ready to win back his belts etc. Not a word of criticism towards Peterson for using Peds Why wouldn't he at least mention if not condemn Peterson, if he hadn't used them himself? It's not as though he is reserved about anything else, I just find it odd.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,881
    Mentioned
    1703 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3137
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Lamont Peterson positive for Taking drugs? Khan fight off????

    Quote Originally Posted by p4pking View Post
    I notice that Khan has only said that he's disappointed and was ready to win back his belts etc. Not a word of criticism towards Peterson for using Peds Why wouldn't he at least mention if not condemn Peterson, if he hadn't used them himself? It's not as though he is reserved about anything else, I just find it odd.
    You are reading too much into it. He has called Peterson a cheat, that says it all.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    6,763
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1339
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Lamont Peterson positive for Taking drugs? Khan fight off????

    Quote Originally Posted by p4pking View Post
    I notice that Khan has only said that he's disappointed and was ready to win back his belts etc. Not a word of criticism towards Peterson for using Peds Why wouldn't he at least mention if not condemn Peterson, if he hadn't used them himself? It's not as though he is reserved about anything else, I just find it odd.
    I've heard him be critical of Peterson. He's been vocal about more stringent testing. He also submitted to the VADA testing without any question. It's the wrong angle, to suspect Khan, when Peterson has been found doing something against the rules. 'Bad for boxing' | Sky Sports | Shows | Ringside

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    6,763
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1339
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Lamont Peterson positive for Taking drugs? Khan fight off????

    Quote Originally Posted by Althugz View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    On a side note, Peterson actaully passed the Nevada drug test because his testosterone ratio was 3.77-1. He failed the VADA test because it also tests for synthetic testosterone, which is what he
    Haha I hope this shows how utterly ridiculous the Nevada state commisions drug testing is. I can not believe more people didn't give Team Pac more hell when they were trying to avoid it with excuses like "nobody is bigger than the sport, we'll do what the commision says". Pathetic.

    As an aside I think it's ridiculous that you're not allowed to supplement with synthetic testosterone to even up your natural test levels if you are low. So if Khan was up at 6 and Peterson was at 1..how fair is it that he is not allowed to even that up to within range?

    It's made even more ridiculous that he would probably be allowed to supplement with things like Tribulus and ZMA to increase testosterone just because they are over the counter supplements.
    Here's the rub, you ARE permitted to supplement with testosterone, you just need to disclose it to the commission so it can be independently verified that you are low.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 244
    Last Post: 12-13-2011, 04:42 AM
  2. LaMont Peterson..
    By DaxxKahn in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 12-14-2009, 04:18 PM
  3. Lamont Peterson-Amir khan
    By Tam Seddon in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-07-2006, 01:26 AM
  4. Naz tests positive for drugs?
    By Gandalf in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 05-22-2006, 04:17 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing