Quote Originally Posted by Althugz View Post
I'm not bashing the NSAC - truth is though, that in a sport like boxing, their tests fall pathetically short.

My main gripe is how people used the NSAC to safeguard Pac when the excuses were flying thick and fast about why Floyds demands were ridiculous "rules are rules - Floyd isn't bigger than the sport blah blah".

Just pure redundant arguements proven by this Khan vs Peterson fiasco.

It costs more money for random, comprehensive drug tests but in the long-term every commisions interest should be to safeguard the fighters that bring in such a healthy income to their state, especially Nevada. They'd lose more money long term by NOT safeguarding their fighters if something goes wrong.
I'm a little surprised Flyod hasn't made a bigger deal about Peterson's failed test. One would think he would be all over it. It seems like the perfect opportunity for Floyd to point out the flaws of the current drug testing. Now that I think about it, has Floyd ever stated that the Nevada testing is inadequate? Or has he tiptoed around criticizing the Nevada Commission? Do you think Floyd's reaction would have been different if Khan had failed the test?