WBC Sucks!!!

[Master]

I see your point but Saul has been fighting decent fighters and he may be getting protection from WBC that another non-Mexican, non-golden boy fighter would not get.

[Manos de Piedra]

Rules change to suit their money making scheme.

[Spicoli]

Kirkland needs to rematch Molina, end of. It's transparent "high exposure" match making for Canelo but smart. Kirkland is a whirling train wreck with a thin chin who can be boxed goofy and he knows it took a hood wink to save a win last out. Rankings are essentially a wink and a nod now, just as the trinkets they lead to are.

[TitoFan]

I see your point but Saul has been fighting decent fighters and he may be getting protection from WBC that another non-Mexican, non-golden boy fighter would not get.

WBC's M.O. for years, which will continue for as long as Sulaiman keeps his stranglehold on the presidency.

[captainanddew]

why do you acknowledge the belts The organizations are corrupt.

The organizations could care less about unbiased and proper rankings. It is all about making them money.

There are guys that have won belts that didn't face a guy that anyone on here would have ranked in the top 15 of that division.



WBO has some beltholders that are very good fighters. Guys I like to watch fight. Cleverly, Huck, Burns, Donaire, Villoria, etc.... All very good fighters. All clearly top 10 fighters in their division.

But the belt the have doesn't mean much. Why? The WBO is a joke. They once ranked a dead guy. A dead guy. Not only ranked him, but moved him up the rankings, all the while 6 feet under!!!!!

But we are supposed to believe the WBO belt means something. If an organization of any type (government, business, educational institution) acted like the WBO and other organizations, then people would completely ignore them.

But these organizations will name 3 champs in the same division, or rank a dead guy, or have rankings where guys are ranked in the top 5, but no unbiased fan or boxing writer would have that guy in the top 20 of the division, and people don't ignore them.

It makes no sense.

[iamasadlittleboy]

why do you acknowledge the belts The organizations are corrupt.

The organizations could care less about unbiased and proper rankings. It is all about making them money.

There are guys that have won belts that didn't face a guy that anyone on here would have ranked in the top 15 of that division.

WBO has some beltholders that are very good fighters. Guys I like to watch fight. Cleverly, Huck, Burns, Donaire, Villoria, etc.... All very good fighters. All clearly top 10 fighters in their division.

But the belt the have doesn't mean much. Why? The WBO is a joke. They once ranked a dead guy. A dead guy. Not only ranked him, but moved him up the rankings, all the while 6 feet under!!!!!

But we are supposed to believe the WBO belt means something. If an organization of any type (government, business, educational institution) acted like the WBO and other organizations, then people would completely ignore them.

But these organizations will name 3 champs in the same division, or rank a dead guy, or have rankings where guys are ranked in the top 5, but no unbiased fan or boxing writer would have that guy in the top 20 of the division, and people don't ignore them.

It makes no sense.

Out of interest why do seem to mostly pick on the WBO here?
The WBC once stripped a fighter for not facing a debutant and have had their bizarre Mexican love in sessions as well as the Rochiggiani affair

The IBF's former leader was found guilty of all sorts of crimes

The WBA hand out titles like candy. (Sorry I'm only saying this in the interests of fairness not as a defence of the WBO)

[TitoFan]

why do you acknowledge the belts The organizations are corrupt.

The organizations could care less about unbiased and proper rankings. It is all about making them money.

There are guys that have won belts that didn't face a guy that anyone on here would have ranked in the top 15 of that division.

WBO has some beltholders that are very good fighters. Guys I like to watch fight. Cleverly, Huck, Burns, Donaire, Villoria, etc.... All very good fighters. All clearly top 10 fighters in their division.

But the belt the have doesn't mean much. Why? The WBO is a joke. They once ranked a dead guy. A dead guy. Not only ranked him, but moved him up the rankings, all the while 6 feet under!!!!!

But we are supposed to believe the WBO belt means something. If an organization of any type (government, business, educational institution) acted like the WBO and other organizations, then people would completely ignore them.

But these organizations will name 3 champs in the same division, or rank a dead guy, or have rankings where guys are ranked in the top 5, but no unbiased fan or boxing writer would have that guy in the top 20 of the division, and people don't ignore them.

It makes no sense.

Out of interest why do seem to mostly pick on the WBO here?
The WBC once stripped a fighter for not facing a debutant and have had their bizarre Mexican love in sessions as well as the Rochiggiani affair

The IBF's former leader was found guilty of all sorts of crimes

The WBA hand out titles like candy. (Sorry I'm only saying this in the interests of fairness not as a defence of the WBO)

Because next to the WBC and WBA, they're the "new kids on the block." But for sheer and blatant corruption, no organization rivals the WBC. José Sulaiman is as corrupt as they come, and his obvious bias toward Mexican fighters is nothing short of shameless. Everyone knows that.