Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 60

Thread: "Sugar" Shane Mosley retires!

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3133
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: "Sugar" Shane Mosley retires!

    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Now you're starting to subtly change your tune, and looking ignorant in the process. The Hopkins and Jones Jr. knockdowns were very different from the knockdowns Trinidad suffered early in his career. The early ones were caused by lack of proper balance by Trinidad. The fact that he immediately bounced up (unhurt) and KO'ed the opponent (in each case) is proof of that. Only an idiot will continue to ignore that fact. Surely you're not an idiot, correct? The Hopkins and Jones Jr. knockdowns occurred late in each fight. Trinidad was clearly losing the fight and had been dominated in each case. Hence, the late knockdowns.

    You started the argument by ignorantly saying Trinidad had a "china-chin". You've subtly eased off that, but still pursue the argument that since Trinidad suffered various knockdowns, Mosley would KO him. Faulty reasoning, for the reasons I've given above.

    To this point, I've humored you and good-naturedly taken the bait you've hung out there, in the spirit of maintaining a good argument back and forth. But I will not answer your questions twice. I've already done that in this post, by once again explaining to you the nature of Trinidad's early knockdowns. Now... as the moderator you are... I expect you to be more of an example to our young, impressionable posters. But if you persist in your asinine arguments, in which you've proceeded to look like quite the fool, you're going to leave me no choice but to ignore your ass altogether.

    You see... I only engage in intelligent arguments.
    Argument? What argument did I start?

    I merely gave a scientfic presentation based on emperical evidence that the the laws of physics suggesst that Tito's china-chin - based on the indisputable fact that he's hit the canvas early, middle and late in his career - gets shattered by Shane Mosley's powerful whacking fists. Nothing more, nothing less.

    I never claimed it to be a certainty. Although the mathematical evidence strongly suggests it is a certainty. Even though it's not. Fact.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,824
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2036
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: "Sugar" Shane Mosley retires!

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Now you're starting to subtly change your tune, and looking ignorant in the process. The Hopkins and Jones Jr. knockdowns were very different from the knockdowns Trinidad suffered early in his career. The early ones were caused by lack of proper balance by Trinidad. The fact that he immediately bounced up (unhurt) and KO'ed the opponent (in each case) is proof of that. Only an idiot will continue to ignore that fact. Surely you're not an idiot, correct? The Hopkins and Jones Jr. knockdowns occurred late in each fight. Trinidad was clearly losing the fight and had been dominated in each case. Hence, the late knockdowns.

    You started the argument by ignorantly saying Trinidad had a "china-chin". You've subtly eased off that, but still pursue the argument that since Trinidad suffered various knockdowns, Mosley would KO him. Faulty reasoning, for the reasons I've given above.

    To this point, I've humored you and good-naturedly taken the bait you've hung out there, in the spirit of maintaining a good argument back and forth. But I will not answer your questions twice. I've already done that in this post, by once again explaining to you the nature of Trinidad's early knockdowns. Now... as the moderator you are... I expect you to be more of an example to our young, impressionable posters. But if you persist in your asinine arguments, in which you've proceeded to look like quite the fool, you're going to leave me no choice but to ignore your ass altogether.

    You see... I only engage in intelligent arguments.
    Argument? What argument did I start?

    I merely gave a scientfic presentation based on emperical evidence that the the laws of physics suggesst that Tito's china-chin - based on the indisputable fact that he's hit the canvas early, middle and late in his career - gets shattered by Shane Mosley's powerful whacking fists. Nothing more, nothing less.

    I never claimed it to be a certainty. Although the mathematical evidence strongly suggests it is a certainty. Even though it's not. Fact.

    To provide "scientific presentation" you must have something larger than a pea-sized brain.
    Fact.

    Also, if you're going to base anything on "empirical evidence".... learn how to spell it first.
    Fact.

    You're a joke, kid. I'm beginning to wonder who you had to blow to become moderator.
    Saddo must've been in the mood for a sick joke.
    Fact.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    49,121
    Mentioned
    950 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: "Sugar" Shane Mosley retires!

    Tito, you seem to be resorting to the insults again and then become a grammar Nazi. I know from experience that it is difficult to spell correctly when drunk. Not easy at all and empirical is a pretty long word.

    Fensters argument is a sound one. Tito got knocked down a lot and Mosley tended to knock down a lot of opponents. It's logical to suggest that Trinidad might be put down by Mosley or even stopped.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,824
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2036
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: "Sugar" Shane Mosley retires!

    Oh, c'mon. You too? Hey... I'm aware anything can happen in a professional prizefight. All we can have are opinions. I just don't like the way Fenster expresses his... and he obviously doesn't like the way I express mine. Are you going to jump to his defense, too? You're a veteran and have been here awhile. You know I'm not the only one Fenster rubs the wrong way. And while you're accusing me of insulting him... can you also see the condescending way he writes his posts? If you're going to get in the middle of the fray, try to be objective. And give me a break, ok?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    49,121
    Mentioned
    950 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: "Sugar" Shane Mosley retires!

    I don't understand. You are the one who is saying that another poster is mentally challenged and has literacy issues.

    It is a valid point that a fighter who has been known to hit the canvas could well do so against another legendary fighter. It's a simple and logical argument to make.

    Fenster's bluster amuses me more than anything but reading through the later stages of this thread it is that argument that is more in tune with my own perceptions.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,824
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2036
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: "Sugar" Shane Mosley retires!

    Quote Originally Posted by Gandalf View Post
    I don't understand. You are the one who is saying that another poster is mentally challenged and has literacy issues.

    It is a valid point that a fighter who has been known to hit the canvas could well do so against another legendary fighter. It's a simple and logical argument to make.

    Fenster's bluster amuses me more than anything but reading through the later stages of this thread it is that argument that is more in tune with my own perceptions.


    Which is fine, Miles. I have no problem seeing the possibility of a knockdown during the fight. And it would be a formidable fight. Two future HOF'ers in their prime... who wouldn't want to see that? No one has a crystal ball to say how it would turn out with 100% certainty. That's what opinions are for. No issues here.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    49,121
    Mentioned
    950 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: "Sugar" Shane Mosley retires!

    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Gandalf View Post
    I don't understand. You are the one who is saying that another poster is mentally challenged and has literacy issues.

    It is a valid point that a fighter who has been known to hit the canvas could well do so against another legendary fighter. It's a simple and logical argument to make.

    Fenster's bluster amuses me more than anything but reading through the later stages of this thread it is that argument that is more in tune with my own perceptions.


    Which is fine, Miles. I have no problem seeing the possibility of a knockdown during the fight. And it would be a formidable fight. Two future HOF'ers in their prime... who wouldn't want to see that? No one has a crystal ball to say how it would turn out with 100% certainty. That's what opinions are for. No issues here.
    Agreed it is a cracking matchup. There are no certainties in boxing. A Mosley win by stoppage is only a possibility and likewise Tito could decision him. You never know.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3133
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: "Sugar" Shane Mosley retires!

    Quote Originally Posted by Gandalf View Post
    Tito, you seem to be resorting to the insults again and then become a grammar Nazi. I know from experience that it is difficult to spell correctly when drunk. Not easy at all and empirical is a pretty long word.

    Fensters argument is a sound one. Tito got knocked down a lot and Mosley tended to knock down a lot of opponents. It's logical to suggest that Trinidad might be put down by Mosley or even stopped.
    Thank you miles.

    Any sane thinking individual can recognise the merit of my logical argument. This TitoFan fellow gets upset very easily and takes umbrage with anything The Fenster says. Very strange.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 49
    Last Post: 03-20-2011, 01:18 AM
  2. (Video) Matirosyan calls out "Sugar Shane" Mosley
    By :::PSL::: in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 10-29-2010, 01:28 AM
  3. Replies: 28
    Last Post: 02-15-2009, 04:19 PM
  4. Replies: 29
    Last Post: 06-15-2007, 10:38 PM
  5. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12-29-2006, 08:50 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing