Romney vs. BO - Saddo's kids race mongering thread

[El Kabong]

Rational as always....hey one of the new members used "your boy" in one of their posts, hows about you go tell him how racist that is won't you?

[Kirkland Laing]

Rational as always....hey one of the new members used "your boy" in one of their posts, hows about you go tell him how racist that is won't you?

If he uses it dozens of times in a row to refer to a black man and then uses it dozens more in BLOCK CAPS then I'll have something to say.

[Kirkland Laing]

And what did happen to the Benghazi scandal? Don't tell me Obama got away with it or it was a great big nothing that was politicised to fool the rubes. He left those people to die you know.

[Kirkland Laing]

The first day of the War on Christmas went really well. ACORN bombers launched precision strikes on all the major elf workshops and the main tinsel mines. We've sent in New Black Panther ground forces to blockade all the main supply routes to the North Pole. More updates to follow.

[El Kabong]

Rational as always....hey one of the new members used "your boy" in one of their posts, hows about you go tell him how racist that is won't you?

If he uses it dozens of times in a row to refer to a black man and then uses it dozens more in BLOCK CAPS then I'll have something to say.

OK, didn't didn't you feel the slightest bit silly posting that?

So YOUR BOY Noam Chomsky isn't racist? Or would it have to be your boy Noam Chomsky? And if the latter is the case then couldn't I say your boy David Haye without you considering it racist or has "your boy" become the new n-word all thanks to my posting? Obama is half black and half white so would it be more racist for me to call him "your boy", "YOUR BOY", "YOUR boy", or "your BOY".....do you not see how silly your view is?

[Kirkland Laing]

Let's just wait and see whether the new guy uses the phrase "your boy" dozens and dozens of times in a row to refer to the same black man. Then we can draw our own conclusions about him.

[Kirkland Laing]

Former Florida GOP leaders say voter suppression was reason they pushed new election law

Former GOP chair, governor - both on outs with party - say voter fraud wasn’t a concern, but reducing Democratic votes was.

A new Florida law that contributed to long voter lines and caused some to abandon voting altogether was intentionally designed by Florida GOP staff and consultants to inhibit Democratic voters, former GOP officials and current GOP consultants have told The Palm Beach Post.
Republican leaders said in proposing the law that it was meant to save money and fight voter fraud. But a former GOP chairman and former Gov. Charlie Crist, both of whom have been ousted from the party, now say that fraud concerns were advanced only as subterfuge for the law’s main purpose: GOP victory.


Various voter registration organizations, minority coalitions and Democratic office holders are now demanding investigations either by state or federal officials.
On Oct. 26, The Post published a story citing a deposition by Florida GOP General Counsel Emmett “Bucky” Mitchell IV in litigation between Florida and the U.S. Justice Department over HB 1355. Mitchell described a meeting near New Year’s Day 2011, in which he was approached by GOP staffers and consultants to write the bill that would become HB 1355.
He said the meeting had followed other conversations with those same GOP officials and consultants since the fall of 2010.
Crist said he was asked
to curb early voting
Crist said party leaders approached him during his 2007-2011 gubernatorial term about changing early voting, in an effort to suppress Democrat turnout. Crist is now at odds with the GOP, since abandoning the party to run for U.S. Senate as an independent in 2010. He is rumored to be planning another run for governor, as a Democrat.
Crist said in a telephone interview this month that he did not recall conversations about early voting specifically targeting black voters “but it looked to me like that was what was being suggested. And I didn’t want them to go there at all.”
About inhibiting minority voters, Greer said:
“The sad thing about that is yes, there is prejudice and racism in the party but the real prevailing thought is that they don’t think minorities will ever vote Republican,” he said. “It’s not really a broad-based racist issue. It’s simply that the Republican Party gave up a long time ago ever believing that anything they did would get minorities to vote for them.”
But a GOP consultant who asked to remain anonymous out of fear of retribution said black voters were a concern.
“I know that the cutting out of the Sunday before Election Day was one of their targets only because that’s a big day when the black churches organize themselves,” he said.


Former Florida GOP leaders say voter suppression was reason... | www.palmbeachpost.com

[El Kabong]

Let's just wait and see whether the new guy uses the phrase "your boy" dozens and dozens of times in a row to refer to the same black man. Then we can draw our own conclusions about him.

In this situation I believe you would use your epic witty response "No, answer the question"

And so I will wait for you to reason out some answer for me before I go back to using my trademark phrase without threat of punishment again comprende muchacho?

[El Kabong]

The saying is either racist or it's not racist there's no gray area for you to hide behind. There are no charts or graphs for you to fall back on either it's ok or it's not....very simple question to answer Kirkland. I do love that you're struggling with it though...."should I admit defeat or should I keep stalling, oh dear oh dear what do I do?"

[Kirkland Laing]

Let's just wait and see whether the new guy uses the phrase "your boy" dozens and dozens of times in a row to refer to the same black man. Then we can draw our own conclusions about him.

In this situation I believe you would use your epic witty response "No, answer the question"

And so I will wait for you to reason out some answer for me before I go back to using my trademark phrase without threat of punishment again comprende muchacho?

It's definitely your trademark. It must have killed you when you agreed to stiop using it.

[El Kabong]

It's definitely your trademark. It must have killed you when you agreed to stiop using it.

Tsk tsk tsk you're not answering the question Kirkland. Go on, answer