Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  15
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 98

Thread: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Los Scandalous, CA
    Posts
    30,802
    Mentioned
    51 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5024
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    JMM was THEE mandatory challenger to Naz... Naz ducked him for a long time.
    That is a fact.

    Emmanuel Steward (RIP) admitted to telling Naz and advising to steer clear from him and not fight him and Naz listened.
    That is also a fact.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,779
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2027
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    Fenster?
    I believe you're up.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3125
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    Well I do need it explained to me?

    How does someone saying a fighter would win a fight mean the other guy ducked him?

    And how the fuck can a fighter be "ducking" someone that is on record admitting they refused the fight?

    (beyond stupid)
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,779
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2027
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    Ah... temper, temper.

    Go back and read post 41. Then let me know if there's something in there you did not understand.

    Go on now...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3125
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Ah... temper, temper.

    Go back and read post 41. Then let me know if there's something in there you did not understand.

    Go on now...
    The questions in post 43 were directly related to the replies in posts 40 and 41.

    Want to have a go at answering the questions? Or you waiting for Mick?
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Barnsley
    Posts
    234
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    685
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    Quote Originally Posted by CutMeMick View Post
    JMM was THEE mandatory challenger to Naz... Naz ducked him for a long time.
    That is a fact.

    Emmanuel Steward (RIP) admitted to telling Naz and advising to steer clear from him and not fight him and Naz listened.
    That is also a fact.
    It is a fact, but it only paints part of the picture. Naz was a superstar, and as such cherry picked opponents that would make big fights. Luis Abregu is number one contender for Mayweather's title, but I won't be accusing Mayweather of ducking him if they never fight.

    I'm a huge Marquez fan, but I'm not kidding myself that he was the same fighter in the late nineties that he became a few years later. Marquez didn't win a world title until after Naz retired. Marquez has stated himself many times that he became more aggressive later in his career because he threw away fights.
    If I had to place a bet, I'd put it on Naz to beat a pre 2000 Marquez.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3125
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    Quote Originally Posted by Bobthepen View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by CutMeMick View Post
    JMM was THEE mandatory challenger to Naz... Naz ducked him for a long time.
    That is a fact.

    Emmanuel Steward (RIP) admitted to telling Naz and advising to steer clear from him and not fight him and Naz listened.
    That is also a fact.
    It is a fact, but it only paints part of the picture. Naz was a superstar, and as such cherry picked opponents that would make big fights. Luis Abregu is number one contender for Mayweather's title, but I won't be accusing Mayweather of ducking him if they never fight.

    I'm a huge Marquez fan, but I'm not kidding myself that he was the same fighter in the late nineties that he became a few years later. Marquez didn't win a world title until after Naz retired. Marquez has stated himself many times that he became more aggressive later in his career because he threw away fights.
    If I had to place a bet, I'd put it on Naz to beat a pre 2000 Marquez.
    Exactly.

    Sadly though that is far to complex for some fans to understand. Some can't even accept that a fighter who says "I turned down the fight" actually turned it down. Hilarious/Madness.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    11,430
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2082
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    That's because one fighter has a history of fighting the GREAT fighters of his era and the other, to put it mildly... doesn't.

    Call me crazy, but when it comes to opposing stories, I am more likely to side with the guy who didn't retire after having fought and widely lost to the single truly elite that he ever faced.

    If Hamed left a better legacy then I might be more open to your cries of avoidance.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,779
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2027
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    Ouch! That had to hurt.
    Once again.......



  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3125
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    Marquez being superior to Naz is irrelevant. That's a given.

    All you have to do is - explain how a fighter has "ducked" someone that refused to fight them? That's it.

    @TitoFan - your immature responses are not hiding your lack of knowledge. Either answer the question or accept you were wrong. There's no shame in being wrong. Fact.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,779
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2027
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    CutMeMick and AdamGB have both refuted your silly theory that the inferior Naz was somehow ducked by the much greater JMM. I've yet to see your answers to them. Why is that, Fen?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Further proof there are too many titles
    By killersheep in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 01-11-2010, 03:08 PM
  2. No Proof That He's Guilty?
    By sanj16 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 01-06-2010, 12:02 AM
  3. Some proof against evolution
    By Von Milash in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-09-2007, 08:25 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing