Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 31

Thread: Dangerous Dogs

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    3,571
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    916
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Define a "dangerous dog". A dog is not inherently dangerous, just because of its breed or even size.

    In actual fact, the most aggressive dogs are the smallest ones. A Jack Russell or terrier type will bite ankles daily and nothing is done.

    It's not the dogs at fault, it's the owners.

    What happened recently was a terrible tragedy. But that shouldn't mean a cull of all dogs that won't fit in a hand bag.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    22
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 0james0 View Post
    Define a "dangerous dog". A dog is not inherently dangerous, just because of its breed or even size.

    In actual fact, the most aggressive dogs are the smallest ones. A Jack Russell or terrier type will bite ankles daily and nothing is done.

    It's not the dogs at fault, it's the owners.

    What happened recently was a terrible tragedy. But that shouldn't mean a cull of all dogs that won't fit in a hand bag.
    Good post, man.

    In almost all cases the owner is responsible. If you are a responsible owner then measures will be taken to ensure these kind if things cannot happen.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    The Edge Of Nowhere
    Posts
    25,138
    Mentioned
    951 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1387
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Dangerous Dogs

    Quote Originally Posted by Lennox Eubank View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by 0james0 View Post
    Define a "dangerous dog". A dog is not inherently dangerous, just because of its breed or even size.

    In actual fact, the most aggressive dogs are the smallest ones. A Jack Russell or terrier type will bite ankles daily and nothing is done.

    It's not the dogs at fault, it's the owners.

    What happened recently was a terrible tragedy. But that shouldn't mean a cull of all dogs that won't fit in a hand bag.
    Good post, man.

    In almost all cases the owner is responsible. If you are a responsible owner then measures will be taken to ensure these kind if things cannot happen.
    There is a big difference between being bit on the ankles by a Jack Russell and having a 12 stone Pit Bull launch itself at you. There is a lot of propaganda on both sides but the facts are not so easy to dismiss. Pitbulls and Staffordshire Bull Terriers are bred from Bulldogs for strength and terriers for gameness. They are working dogs that started life fighting bears and bulls before being bred to fight each other. Staffies seem to get a bad press often because owners are calling what is in fact a pitbull or crossed pitbull a staffie to prevent being prosecuted.

    When studies conclude that 94% of attacks on children by Pitbulls are unprovoked compared to 42% in other breeds you can't pretend that breed has nothing to do with it. The fact is that there is a much higher risk of death when attacked by a dog descended from fighting stock than that of other breeds. Why take that risk when you have kids? Staffies are a lot more distantly related than pitbulls from the original fighting stock and like pitbulls are very loyal without being potentially dangerous but that danger is still there. It is also true that a lot of criminal irresponsible aggressive dipshits are attracted to the idea of owning such a breed and like any other dog they need care and training something those types of idiot are unlikely to give. It then makes it seem like even responsible owners are looking after a potential time bomb.

    There is such a thing as a dangerous dog, and ironically owning one when you have kids is unlikely to protect them, because they often like people, and are not ideal to be trained as attack or guard dogs. They are descended from fighting dogs though, and their unpredictability and propensity and inbred ability to inflict major damage and even kill does expose anyone in their vicinity to more danger. Most dangerous dog attacks are suffered by friends or members of the owners family,not strangers.
    Hidden Content

    "I am always doing that which I can not do, in order that I may learn how to do it."

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    1,434
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    882
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Dangerous Dogs

    It all depends on the owner 99% of the time. You treat your dog with care give it a good life and you'll have a loving, friendly dog you need not worry about. You give your dog a shitty life and make it aggressive then your more to blame than the poor dog if something does happen.

    Lots of people should be allowed to have dog's that's something that needs to be dealt with not 'dangerous dogs'.
    Hidden Content
    Records are for DJ's - Dan 'The outlaw' Hardy

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    6
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Dangerous Dogs

    Quote Originally Posted by 0james0 View Post
    Define a "dangerous dog". A dog is not inherently dangerous, just because of its breed or even size.

    In actual fact, the most aggressive dogs are the smallest ones. A Jack Russell or terrier type will bite ankles daily and nothing is done.

    It's not the dogs at fault, it's the owners.

    What happened recently was a terrible tragedy. But that shouldn't mean a cull of all dogs that won't fit in a hand bag.
    You have a good point. I remember having a paper round when I was younger where there was a little terrier which always tried to bite me through the letterbox and it often ripped up the newspapers. It was as it it was always waiting for me haha :P

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Dogs or Cats
    By Plopeater in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 54
    Last Post: 09-06-2008, 05:24 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing