Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 22

Thread: Peterson vs. Matthysse is now a catchweight fight at 141lbs.

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    47,271
    Mentioned
    440 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5145
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Peterson vs. Matthysse is now a catchweight fight at 141lbs.

    Quote Originally Posted by Nameless View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Spicoli View Post
    Talk about more proof that trinkets should start coming with rental agreements. Can we just start announcing winners as "and the NEWWWW catchweight champion of Jose Sullied'mans world"

    Gimmicks, tricks and cons.

    This. Simply this. Thus said, rumors are that Sullied'sman is working on the pearl belt. That would be a belt for those competing in 2 different weight categories, that would be unbeaten but that wouldn't have belts in one of those categories. For a small fee, they could defend the pearl belt
    I can see that crooked slug doing a copy & paste on your idea right now The alphabet bodies sound more and more like a gaggle who know they are on borrowed time

    Clear self inflicted wound that says..."we dont need you" Good fighters, earned spots, 12 rounds..."Trinkets? We dont need no stinkin trinkets"

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    801
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    796
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Peterson vs. Matthysse is now a catchweight fight at 141lbs.

    This is the dumbest thing I ever heard off. We all need to go on the social network to try to force GBP to make this fight RIGHT!!!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Montreal/Luxembourg
    Posts
    6,399
    Mentioned
    25 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1094
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Peterson vs. Matthysse is now a catchweight fight at 141lbs.

    Quote Originally Posted by Spicoli View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Nameless View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Spicoli View Post
    Talk about more proof that trinkets should start coming with rental agreements. Can we just start announcing winners as "and the NEWWWW catchweight champion of Jose Sullied'mans world"

    Gimmicks, tricks and cons.

    This. Simply this. Thus said, rumors are that Sullied'sman is working on the pearl belt. That would be a belt for those competing in 2 different weight categories, that would be unbeaten but that wouldn't have belts in one of those categories. For a small fee, they could defend the pearl belt
    I can see that crooked slug doing a copy & paste on your idea right now The alphabet bodies sound more and more like a gaggle who know they are on borrowed time

    Clear self inflicted wound that says..."we dont need you" Good fighters, earned spots, 12 rounds..."Trinkets? We dont need no stinkin trinkets"
    At the very leat, he would give my idea a very very long and contemplated thought. Perhaps he'd like to change "pearl" by "steel" to sound more warrior or "platinum" to give an even better fake value but he would think about the idea.
    Hidden Content
    That's the way it is, not the way it ends

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Peterson vs matthysse on May 18th!!!
    By Abelardus in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 03-25-2013, 05:10 PM
  2. Matthysse v Peterson
    By Silkeyjoe in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 03-15-2013, 02:38 AM
  3. So the Berto-Ortiz fight was at a catchweight
    By generalbulldog in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 04-23-2011, 08:25 PM
  4. what fight do you like for pac? catchweight or 147?
    By mad_takamura in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 06-28-2009, 04:51 PM
  5. Replies: 14
    Last Post: 05-27-2006, 06:05 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing