Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 55

Thread: Catchweights are becoming an easy copout.

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3125
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Catchweights are becoming an easy copout.

    Quote Originally Posted by bzkfn View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by bzkfn View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Catchweights are actually the fairest form of boxing you can get. BOTH fighters have to be in unison. One man says he's comfortable making the agreed weight, the other man says he's comfortable making the agreed weight. Harmony.

    You can't have excuses after like - "he was weightdrained," "he's small at the weight," "he's big at the weight"

    The best man wins. Perfect.
    Bullshit. Everyone bitched when Pac made Cotto drop 2 pounds. Sometimes fighters request a catchweight to gain an unfair advantage.
    Only silly fans bitched AFTER Cotto had been duffed up. Cotto had NO PROBLEM agreeing to the weight.

    Catchweights are requested to make an EVEN playing field. If a fighter AGREES to make the weight, he has ZERO excuses if he loses. Simple as.
    Yeah he did. The fight stalled for a while because Pac wanted 144. Cotto took it for the money, then was pissed because the WBO said his 147 his belt was on the line.
    Look i'm not getting into a Cotto-Pac argument,* specific cases are irrelevant. I'm just saying there's nothing wrong with catchweights. I couldn't careless if a fight doesn't involve a micky mouse belt.

    *For the record - Cotto said he was fine with 145 "I am going to reach 145 with no problem. The last fight I spent more than 24 hours doing nothing. Just waiting for the weigh-in. My weight was 145. We would not have taken this fight if we didn’t think I was going to be at my best."

    No excuses.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    18,672
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Catchweights are becoming an easy copout.

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by bzkfn View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by bzkfn View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Catchweights are actually the fairest form of boxing you can get. BOTH fighters have to be in unison. One man says he's comfortable making the agreed weight, the other man says he's comfortable making the agreed weight. Harmony.

    You can't have excuses after like - "he was weightdrained," "he's small at the weight," "he's big at the weight"

    The best man wins. Perfect.
    Bullshit. Everyone bitched when Pac made Cotto drop 2 pounds. Sometimes fighters request a catchweight to gain an unfair advantage.
    Only silly fans bitched AFTER Cotto had been duffed up. Cotto had NO PROBLEM agreeing to the weight.

    Catchweights are requested to make an EVEN playing field. If a fighter AGREES to make the weight, he has ZERO excuses if he loses. Simple as.
    Yeah he did. The fight stalled for a while because Pac wanted 144. Cotto took it for the money, then was pissed because the WBO said his 147 his belt was on the line.
    Look i'm not getting into a Cotto-Pac argument,* specific cases are irrelevant. I'm just saying there's nothing wrong with catchweights. I couldn't careless if a fight doesn't involve a micky mouse belt.

    *For the record - Cotto said he was fine with 145 "I am going to reach 145 with no problem. The last fight I spent more than 24 hours doing nothing. Just waiting for the weigh-in. My weight was 145. We would not have taken this fight if we didn’t think I was going to be at my best."

    No excuses.
    How dare you bring facts into this discussion.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,779
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2028
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Catchweights are becoming an easy copout.

    Catchweights are still the scourge of boxing. Pick a weight class... train properly... learn how to make weight effectively... and go fight. If it's too difficult, go to the next weight. As for the argument on title fights vs. non-title fights..... consider this: Two top contenders fighting for the right to fight for the title. What. They're going to fight at some stupid catchweight, only to have to make the weight for the title fight? What kind of bullshit is that?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    18,672
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Catchweights are becoming an easy copout.

    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Catchweights are still the scourge of boxing. Pick a weight class... train properly... learn how to make weight effectively... and go fight. If it's too difficult, go to the next weight. As for the argument on title fights vs. non-title fights..... consider this: Two top contenders fighting for the right to fight for the title. What. They're going to fight at some stupid catchweight, only to have to make the weight for the title fight? What kind of bullshit is that?
    Wrong yet again. Matthysse wants the Danny Garcia fight. He doesn't give a fuck about the titles. He said he'll gladly face Garcia at 141 in order to let Garcia keep his belts after he beats him. Cuz he doesn't give a fuck about the belts. If he did he would of gave up his WBC interim title and just faced Peterson for his IBF title. But he didn't. Cuz it's not about the belts. Matthysse holding that Interim title keeps him as Garcia''s mandatory.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,779
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2028
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Catchweights are becoming an easy copout.

    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Catchweights are still the scourge of boxing. Pick a weight class... train properly... learn how to make weight effectively... and go fight. If it's too difficult, go to the next weight. As for the argument on title fights vs. non-title fights..... consider this: Two top contenders fighting for the right to fight for the title. What. They're going to fight at some stupid catchweight, only to have to make the weight for the title fight? What kind of bullshit is that?
    Wrong yet again. Matthysse wants the Danny Garcia fight. He doesn't give a fuck about the titles. He said he'll gladly face Garcia at 141 in order to let Garcia keep his belts after he beats him. Cuz he doesn't give a fuck about the belts. If he did he would of gave up his WBC interim title and just faced Peterson for his IBF title. But he didn't. Cuz it's not about the belts. Matthysse holding that Interim title keeps him as Garcia''s mandatory.

    That's what non-title bouts are for. Ever heard of those? Why cloud up the weight issue with catchweights? Weight issues in boxing are muddled up as it is. You got jerks like JCC Jr. fighting at middleweight when he should be campaigning as a cruiserweight. The true purpose of catchweights is to have two fighters face each other when they're at their limits of weight loss or gain. Example: When Martinez talks about fighting Mayweather. There I can see a catchweight. At some point it's too much weight for Floyd to gain or for Sergio to lose. But just for grins? Nah. Call it a non-title fight, like in the old days.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    18,672
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Catchweights are becoming an easy copout.

    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Catchweights are still the scourge of boxing. Pick a weight class... train properly... learn how to make weight effectively... and go fight. If it's too difficult, go to the next weight. As for the argument on title fights vs. non-title fights..... consider this: Two top contenders fighting for the right to fight for the title. What. They're going to fight at some stupid catchweight, only to have to make the weight for the title fight? What kind of bullshit is that?
    Wrong yet again. Matthysse wants the Danny Garcia fight. He doesn't give a fuck about the titles. He said he'll gladly face Garcia at 141 in order to let Garcia keep his belts after he beats him. Cuz he doesn't give a fuck about the belts. If he did he would of gave up his WBC interim title and just faced Peterson for his IBF title. But he didn't. Cuz it's not about the belts. Matthysse holding that Interim title keeps him as Garcia''s mandatory.

    That's what non-title bouts are for. Ever heard of those? Why cloud up the weight issue with catchweights? Weight issues in boxing are muddled up as it is. You got jerks like JCC Jr. fighting at middleweight when he should be campaigning as a cruiserweight. The true purpose of catchweights is to have two fighters face each other when they're at their limits of weight loss or gain. Example: When Martinez talks about fighting Mayweather. There I can see a catchweight. At some point it's too much weight for Floyd to gain or for Sergio to lose. But just for grins? Nah. Call it a non-title fight, like in the old days.
    They are calling Peterson-Matthysse a non-title fight. Just like the old days

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,779
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2028
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Catchweights are becoming an easy copout.

    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Catchweights are still the scourge of boxing. Pick a weight class... train properly... learn how to make weight effectively... and go fight. If it's too difficult, go to the next weight. As for the argument on title fights vs. non-title fights..... consider this: Two top contenders fighting for the right to fight for the title. What. They're going to fight at some stupid catchweight, only to have to make the weight for the title fight? What kind of bullshit is that?
    Wrong yet again. Matthysse wants the Danny Garcia fight. He doesn't give a fuck about the titles. He said he'll gladly face Garcia at 141 in order to let Garcia keep his belts after he beats him. Cuz he doesn't give a fuck about the belts. If he did he would of gave up his WBC interim title and just faced Peterson for his IBF title. But he didn't. Cuz it's not about the belts. Matthysse holding that Interim title keeps him as Garcia''s mandatory.

    That's what non-title bouts are for. Ever heard of those? Why cloud up the weight issue with catchweights? Weight issues in boxing are muddled up as it is. You got jerks like JCC Jr. fighting at middleweight when he should be campaigning as a cruiserweight. The true purpose of catchweights is to have two fighters face each other when they're at their limits of weight loss or gain. Example: When Martinez talks about fighting Mayweather. There I can see a catchweight. At some point it's too much weight for Floyd to gain or for Sergio to lose. But just for grins? Nah. Call it a non-title fight, like in the old days.
    They are calling Peterson-Matthysse a non-title fight. Just like the old days


    Seriously... hate aside. What is the big fucking deal of just making weight at one of the MANY weight divisions? There used to be less divisions in the old days. The number was increased. The difference between divisions is a mere 7 pounds. Forget it's me asking the question. Are catchweights really all that necessary in boxing?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Yes or No Poll regarding Catchweights
    By Kev in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 07-03-2009, 09:48 PM
  2. Still too easy IMO
    By kingfrnk in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-29-2009, 07:52 AM
  3. Mundine does it easy
    By Big Jack in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 07-04-2007, 08:10 AM
  4. No easy meal here !
    By Lords Gym in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 07-03-2007, 05:48 PM
  5. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 06-01-2006, 08:58 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing