Re: Catchweights are becoming an easy copout.

Originally Posted by
bzkfn

Originally Posted by
Fenster

Originally Posted by
bzkfn

Originally Posted by
Fenster
Catchweights are actually the fairest form of boxing you can get. BOTH fighters have to be in unison. One man says he's comfortable making the agreed weight, the other man says he's comfortable making the agreed weight. Harmony.
You can't have excuses after like - "he was weightdrained," "he's small at the weight," "he's big at the weight"
The best man wins. Perfect.
Bullshit. Everyone bitched when Pac made Cotto drop 2 pounds. Sometimes fighters request a catchweight to gain an unfair advantage.
Only silly fans bitched AFTER Cotto had been duffed up.
Cotto had NO PROBLEM agreeing to the weight.
Catchweights are requested to make an EVEN playing field. If a fighter AGREES to make the weight, he has ZERO excuses if he loses. Simple as.
Yeah he did. The fight stalled for a while because Pac wanted 144. Cotto took it for the money, then was pissed because the WBO said his 147 his belt was on the line.
Look i'm not getting into a Cotto-Pac argument,* specific cases are irrelevant. I'm just saying there's nothing wrong with catchweights. I couldn't careless if a fight doesn't involve a micky mouse belt.
*For the record - Cotto said he was fine with 145 "I am going to reach 145 with no problem. The last fight I spent more than 24 hours doing nothing. Just waiting for the weigh-in. My weight was 145. We would not have taken this fight if we didn’t think I was going to be at my best."
No excuses.
3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.
Bookmarks