Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 60

Thread: Boxers who you think would NOT have been so great if not for their size

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    3,502
    Mentioned
    60 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    734
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Boxers who you think would NOT have been so great if not for their size

    Without reading anything other then the opener to this thread, its seems pretty pointless to me. You cant say a fighter is only good because of there size because thats part of them. You could then say what fighter would not have been so great without their speed, their power etc.

    You could take one think from any fighter and they would not have been so great.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    S.W. Fla USA
    Posts
    147
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    657
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Boxers who you think would NOT have been so great if not for their size

    Havyweights Primo Canerra was 6'6" 250 and although most of his bouts were controlled by the mob he did know how to use his height advantage especially because he punched with very little power!
    Ali might have had a tuffer time if he was 6' tall. His reactions and eye hand coordination was above everyone elses but his unconventional habit of "leaning back" from punches wouldn't be as effective without his 6'3" advantage!
    Wlad Klitz has used his height advantage as well as anyone through boxing history! His height gives him a reach advantage also and without his 6'6"/7" height I don't believe he has the success he's had! His skills are ordinary and his power is above average but his height is the deciding factor against inupt challengers who don't have the skills or willingness to get under him!
    Tommy Hearns obviously used his 6'1" at 147 to a huge advantage to go along with dropping a huge right hand! Tommy used his height well but was at a disadvantage once his opponent broke inside him! Also those long skinny legs weren't the best "shock absorbers" when punches bounced off his chin! Hearns had more heart than most, thats for sure!
    Jess Willard 6'7" thats about it for Big Jess he was a tuff SOB but if he was 6' he'd never have the success he had!
    Sndy Sadler at 5'9" 126lb featherking had a huge advantage in size but he didn't need it hahaha!!
    After being stopped in his second pro fought he fought 161 more fights and was NEVER stopped again! He was a big feather that could punch holes in walls!
    Theres plenty more but heres a few I think are pretty meaningfull. Ray

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. TOP 3 COUNTRIES WITH GREAT BOXERS
    By brucelee in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 47
    Last Post: 09-11-2007, 05:32 AM
  2. Unlikely Great Pro Boxers?
    By Beanflicker in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 03-09-2007, 12:58 AM
  3. End of the Road for Four Great Boxers...
    By ArawakWarria in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-28-2007, 04:35 AM
  4. Replies: 26
    Last Post: 10-11-2006, 04:48 AM
  5. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 03-04-2006, 07:02 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing