Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 60

Thread: Boxers who you think would NOT have been so great if not for their size

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    The Edge Of Nowhere
    Posts
    25,138
    Mentioned
    951 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1388
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Boxers who you think would NOT have been so great if not for their size

    Quote Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Greenbeanz View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Greenbeanz View Post
    Granted at 6 foot 7 is very tall . Your argument does not hold up to much scrutiny.
    bullshit. Michael Granted was 6 foot 8. Now you are subtracting an inch.

    p.s. Beanz. Those Fury clips prove shite mate, in the 2nd clip yes Fury goes down at 545 but he almost knocks out his opponent at 6:07. He reovered fast and held on due to his gargantuan size. Then lands a wicked overhand right. He only survived for his size, hanging on and clutching and smothering. Thats another thing a huge guy can do when hurt---clutch and smother and grab, the oppoent cannot even bee seen he is totally covered up as if by a giant squid.

    Joe Frazier had nowhere to clutch and hold when Foreman batted him about the ring in '73. He was too small. Lewis could clutch and hold with his huge arms until he recovered, like Fury did in both of your clips.

    Mentioning Joe Frazier and Tyson Fury in the same thread is heinous enough. The same post is really pushing it. The same paragraph is almost unforgivable. Anyone else and I would have put myself on ignore. I am now going off to cry into my whiskey.
    Oh please. Such melodrama. "heinous", "unforgivable", "ignore", "cry", "whiskey"....

    Beanz you could be a script writer for a Korean drama. They make mountains out of mole hills over there!
    It's called flair darling. I am an artist and I demand my 10%
    Hidden Content

    "I am always doing that which I can not do, in order that I may learn how to do it."

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Ex'way to your Skull
    Posts
    25,024
    Mentioned
    232 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Boxers who you think would NOT have been so great if not for their size

    Quote Originally Posted by Greenbeanz View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Greenbeanz View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Greenbeanz View Post
    Granted at 6 foot 7 is very tall . Your argument does not hold up to much scrutiny.
    bullshit. Michael Granted was 6 foot 8. Now you are subtracting an inch.

    p.s. Beanz. Those Fury clips prove shite mate, in the 2nd clip yes Fury goes down at 545 but he almost knocks out his opponent at 6:07. He reovered fast and held on due to his gargantuan size. Then lands a wicked overhand right. He only survived for his size, hanging on and clutching and smothering. Thats another thing a huge guy can do when hurt---clutch and smother and grab, the oppoent cannot even bee seen he is totally covered up as if by a giant squid.

    Joe Frazier had nowhere to clutch and hold when Foreman batted him about the ring in '73. He was too small. Lewis could clutch and hold with his huge arms until he recovered, like Fury did in both of your clips.

    Mentioning Joe Frazier and Tyson Fury in the same thread is heinous enough. The same post is really pushing it. The same paragraph is almost unforgivable. Anyone else and I would have put myself on ignore. I am now going off to cry into my whiskey.
    Oh please. Such melodrama. "heinous", "unforgivable", "ignore", "cry", "whiskey"....

    Beanz you could be a script writer for a Korean drama. They make mountains out of mole hills over there!
    It's called flair darling. I am an artist and I demand my 10%
    atleast have the balls to demand the 80% that Fury does.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    The Edge Of Nowhere
    Posts
    25,138
    Mentioned
    951 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1388
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Boxers who you think would NOT have been so great if not for their size

    Quote Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Greenbeanz View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Greenbeanz View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Greenbeanz View Post
    Granted at 6 foot 7 is very tall . Your argument does not hold up to much scrutiny.
    bullshit. Michael Granted was 6 foot 8. Now you are subtracting an inch.

    p.s. Beanz. Those Fury clips prove shite mate, in the 2nd clip yes Fury goes down at 545 but he almost knocks out his opponent at 6:07. He reovered fast and held on due to his gargantuan size. Then lands a wicked overhand right. He only survived for his size, hanging on and clutching and smothering. Thats another thing a huge guy can do when hurt---clutch and smother and grab, the oppoent cannot even bee seen he is totally covered up as if by a giant squid.

    Joe Frazier had nowhere to clutch and hold when Foreman batted him about the ring in '73. He was too small. Lewis could clutch and hold with his huge arms until he recovered, like Fury did in both of your clips.

    Mentioning Joe Frazier and Tyson Fury in the same thread is heinous enough. The same post is really pushing it. The same paragraph is almost unforgivable. Anyone else and I would have put myself on ignore. I am now going off to cry into my whiskey.
    Oh please. Such melodrama. "heinous", "unforgivable", "ignore", "cry", "whiskey"....

    Beanz you could be a script writer for a Korean drama. They make mountains out of mole hills over there!
    It's called flair darling. I am an artist and I demand my 10%
    atleast have the balls to demand the 80% that Fury does.
    That's the whole point demanding 80% shows he has no balls.
    Hidden Content

    "I am always doing that which I can not do, in order that I may learn how to do it."

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Ex'way to your Skull
    Posts
    25,024
    Mentioned
    232 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Boxers who you think would NOT have been so great if not for their size

    Quote Originally Posted by Greenbeanz View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Greenbeanz View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Greenbeanz View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Greenbeanz View Post
    Granted at 6 foot 7 is very tall . Your argument does not hold up to much scrutiny.
    bullshit. Michael Granted was 6 foot 8. Now you are subtracting an inch.

    p.s. Beanz. Those Fury clips prove shite mate, in the 2nd clip yes Fury goes down at 545 but he almost knocks out his opponent at 6:07. He reovered fast and held on due to his gargantuan size. Then lands a wicked overhand right. He only survived for his size, hanging on and clutching and smothering. Thats another thing a huge guy can do when hurt---clutch and smother and grab, the oppoent cannot even bee seen he is totally covered up as if by a giant squid.

    Joe Frazier had nowhere to clutch and hold when Foreman batted him about the ring in '73. He was too small. Lewis could clutch and hold with his huge arms until he recovered, like Fury did in both of your clips.

    Mentioning Joe Frazier and Tyson Fury in the same thread is heinous enough. The same post is really pushing it. The same paragraph is almost unforgivable. Anyone else and I would have put myself on ignore. I am now going off to cry into my whiskey.
    Oh please. Such melodrama. "heinous", "unforgivable", "ignore", "cry", "whiskey"....

    Beanz you could be a script writer for a Korean drama. They make mountains out of mole hills over there!
    It's called flair darling. I am an artist and I demand my 10%
    atleast have the balls to demand the 80% that Fury does.
    That's the whole point demanding 80% shows he has no balls.
    but he has flair

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    The Edge Of Nowhere
    Posts
    25,138
    Mentioned
    951 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1388
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Fury has no flair. He isn't tough. He can't speak English and he was born in England. He has no respect for anybody past or present in boxing and had to put a cruiserweight into a headlock to knock him out. In his case size is all he has. Having said that he may still be about to get ktfo by a much smaller man.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. TOP 3 COUNTRIES WITH GREAT BOXERS
    By brucelee in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 47
    Last Post: 09-11-2007, 05:32 AM
  2. Unlikely Great Pro Boxers?
    By Beanflicker in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 03-09-2007, 12:58 AM
  3. End of the Road for Four Great Boxers...
    By ArawakWarria in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-28-2007, 04:35 AM
  4. Replies: 26
    Last Post: 10-11-2006, 04:48 AM
  5. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 03-04-2006, 07:02 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing