Angel Adams, 37 yrs old with 15 kids and complaining about lack of gov't assistance

[Memphis]

No, having a kid doesnt automatically make you an idiot. Having fifteen and no means to support them yes, that makes you an idiot.

[El Kabong]

No, having a kid doesnt automatically make you an idiot. Having fifteen and no means to support them yes, that makes you an idiot.

...ah but here's the thought process, WELFARE is a means to support them. If not for welfare, then those children would be taken from that woman and adopted by people who COULD care for them.

It's just bad news when Uncle Sam steps in to play "Baby Daddy"

[chinchekked]

I think that this whole problem could be taken care of if the screening process a little more meticulous. I'll even be a little forgiving for the sake of my point, how do they not cut her off after the 3rd or 4th child?! I'm all for helping people but I can not be convinced that this women would have had these kids if she didn't know the gov't was going to take care of them and its that selfishness and sense of entitlement that need to be cut off at the head. I strongly dislike people like this because people work hard to make decent livings and make great sacrifices throughout their lives just to get by but all this bitch does is lay on her back and wait for the gov't check.

[IamInuit]

New proof that evolution is a fact.

[Gandalf]

It's also interesting that over half of the people in the fast food industry need the state to allow them to live. Now it would make more sense to make sure that the corporations pay a living wage rather than have the taxpayer take the hit. Otherwise, McDonalds investors do well and the government is paying out money that it shouldn't need to be paying if only corporations were behaving ethically. It's the public who pay when the profits should simply be reduced.

More than Half of Fast Food Workers Rely on Welfare

[El Kabong]

Fast food jobs are for unskilled teenagers....yeah let's pay them $30 to flip burgers



Miles for a guy who has "nothing against VC" why would you constantly attack him? You have said the most hateful things about him.

[Gandalf]

No, they don't deserve 30 dollars an hour, but enough to pay the bills, rent, and put food on the table. Otherwise, those jobs just shouldn't exist and people need burgers and corporations can manage by paying labour what they deserve.

What passes between me and VC is just that too. It is none of your business and I think VC is testament to my ability to say sorry after crossing the line. You on the other hand never do so. You cannot get much more nasty than to say one 'has no redeemable qualities' and have a repeated variation of that time and time again. Now I don't have a whole lot of time for dead soldiers in Iraq, I make no bones about that. They shouldn't have been there. That is how I feel about wars based on lies, I think VC now admits Iraq was a mistake too. To say one one has no redeemable qualities for the relatively benign life choices that I make is a bit extreme. You try to paint me with the same rhetoric as would be used with a serial killer or something, when all I am is a member of this online community. This is my home as much as yours, so please don't paint me with the same kind of rhetoric as the kind of war criminal revealed by Wikileaks.

To constantly attack my work in thread after thread when it has nothing to do with the threads at hand is extremely weak too. As I say, I have worked bloody hard to get an education and do what I do. I don't like it to be sniffed at. Me being an educator has nothing to do with being a private man with strong political views. You have them too, should all people with political views join the government assistance crowd? Should we just quit and become a hippy and an isolationist following our respective unemployed paths? I'm good at what I do, and maybe you are good at whatever you do, but we still have those tangents that are not part of the mainstream. That's who we are.

In response to you, I do become extremely harsh myself and I know that. I know I can be exasperating, but you are another side of the same coin. It's annoying because I don't particularly want to be at constant odds with you, but you keep jumping into threads like the Syria one and seemingly for no other reason than an attempt to annoy me. It escalates and then we are at war again. It's like the Middle East.

[Gandalf]

No, having a kid doesnt automatically make you an idiot. Having fifteen and no means to support them yes, that makes you an idiot.

Yes, it is a significantly different thing.

I disagree with Lyle's notion that charity can solve all of societies ills. Those that create inequality and poverty, have largely gained from perpetuating such a system. It is only right that tax is redistributed and that alone should be sufficient enough to reduce social inequality. That doesn't mean paying for every Mum and her dozen kids though, there needs to be sufficient checks and balances. If you are on welfare and get pregnant again for instance, then you should automatically be denied extra benefits.

I look at the society here and there is no such thing as the welfare Mum. It simply wouldn't be accepted and thus nobody allows it to happen. By being more hardline, you can stamp out blatant abuse. However, I think what we have here is perhaps too extreme. It really comes down to a sense of balance and proportion.

If the ordinary person wants a child then they should have one, but make sure they can provide for them first. If you've paid your taxes year in year out and things go wrong, then you deserve support too. You shouldn't need charities to bail you out as Lyle seems to think, your own contributions should suffice and people in the UK in particular tend to pay more than their share in taxes.

[VictorCharlie]

America's welfare state has created a sense of victimhood in poor communities. Politicians have garnered minority votes by pandering to them with government assistance for decades. These programs have perpetuated the poverty cycle thus creating more and more demand for government assistance. Politicians have essentially hooked poor communities on government assistance like a drug. The federal government should have no role in welfare programs. At a max this should be done at the state level and truthfully even more local than that. Let local communities decide how they support those in need an more importantly how they want to fund that support. Penn Jillette has a great quote on this.

"It's amazing to me how many people think that voting to have the government give poor people money is compassion. Helping poor and suffering people is compassion. Voting for our government to use guns to give money to help poor and suffering people is immoral self-righteous bullying laziness.

People need to be fed, medicated, educated, clothed, and sheltered, and if we're compassionate we'll help them, but you get no moral credit for forcing other people to do what you think is right. There is great joy in helping people, but no joy in doing it at gunpoint."

Good video that illustrates this.


Humans are capable of so much but a lot of us will continually do just enough. America needs to raise the bar for what we expect of our citizens and then hold them accountable. This is absurd


Miles min. wage is the biggest discriminator against young and unskilled labor. It is amazing that politicians get poor people to vote against their own best interests. The best thing we could do for young and unskilled labor is to abolish the the minimum wage.


Our system for service jobs provides an opportunity for the worker to make more money than they could at a normal wage/hr job, it provides the customer w/a cheaper product and better service and the employer with a lower overhead and thus ability to hire more people. I ran a bar & grill. My waitresses were mostly young college girls w/ busy schedules. They usually worked three nights a week for 5-8 hours and walked out with $150 on average a night. If they actually worked 24 hours in a week that is almost $19/hr. No restaurant could afford to pay a full wait staff and bar staff that wage w/o 1. dramatically raising prices 2. cutting staff 3. forcing out young workers who are looking for a decent job with flexible and low hours. Not to mention being a tip based salary creates a great incentive for the worker to give you the best possible service and if you think it was substandard you can simply not tip.

[Gandalf]

VC, I simply cannot understand where you are coming from with some of your views. The abolishment of the minimum wage, for instance, is not going to help anyone bar those who want to abuse workers who are seen as a factor of production. In fact, I see no reason to even discuss such positions as I find them to be little more than reproduction of Chicago school points of views, which rational people have long seen as being scams which make the business community happy.

In America you have waiters earning 2 dollars 15 an hour as a basic wage, you have a minimum wage of something around 7 dollars an hour. Do you know how little that is? Why should you rely on the customer to tip? Why should you be earning a minimum wage half that of the UK? It is pure corporate greed and it doesn't take much for McDonald's to simply clean its act up and pay a fair wage. The catering industry is an exploitation industry and likewise, should be cleaned up. Let them go out of business. If you cannot pay the worker a wage without relying on my charity, then you deserve to go broke. You shouldn't have a business. You are a failed business.

In terms of a welfare state, I am quite in the middle. I have been in employment since the age of 14, I know the value of work and have always been in work. My first working wage almost 2 decades ago was more than double what an American waitress will recieve as a basic payment minus tips. I believe in the value of labour. That means paying the worker to do a job. It means closing your borders and it means paying the person who cleans your toilet a fair wage. He deserves it, and so do you, and so do I. Only open the borders for skilled jobs that local people just cannot do.

In the West, I think people have on the whole been sold out. My friend was talking about whenever he goes home to Scotland the taxi drivers are all Polish. There is a reason for that, it is because unchecked access to a labour market increases competition and drives down wages. I would quite like to be a taxi driver, but why would you do it for peanuts, just to make the owners happy? The dilution of markets is a problem and the lack of a meaningful minimum wage is a huge factor.

I don't think British people have any particular aversion to working for Scotish taxi firms. However, if wages are lower it would make a lot more sense to overseas workers who will happily work for less. I think it all leads to a serious problem. You could just blame the poor natives who will never do a days work, but at the same time, I think American and British societies have been seriously harmed by the policies set from above. They have clearly failed and I would like the opposite of much of what you argue.

People don't ask to be outsourced, they don't ask for borders to be unchecked, on the whole I don't think it is fair to blame most people who are struggling. I think Britain and America have been sold a Friedman based lie and the latest from Britain is that under 25's should not recieve benefits and that the mail service be privatised. I think the country has been sold out and viewpoints like yours are a problem.

[TitoFan]

By all means this woman should receive government assistance.

The government should assist her in relocating these kids to the homes of unfortunate, caring couples who cannot have children of their own... but are perfectly capable of raising some. It's a "win-win-win" situation. The kids win by getting a fair shake in life, being raised with the proper love and attention. The new parents win by getting their lifelong wish of having children to raise and care for. And the "shit-for-brains" hamster...er... woman wins by getting a huge load and responsibility off her back. One that she can ill afford to perform correctly.

[VictorCharlie]

The abolishment of the minimum wage, for instance, is not going to help anyone bar those who want to abuse workers who are seen as a factor of production. In fact, I see no reason to even discuss such positions as I find them to be little more than reproduction of Chicago school points of views, which rational people have long seen as being scams which make the business community happy.

I wouldn't want to debate either if the side I'd taken was patently false. If you had ever run a business or managed a payroll then you'd be aware of this. Raising the minimum wage raises the floor for wages but not the ceiling and thus pushes people out of the job market. Of course in this case it is the young and unskilled that get pushed out so the reality is it hurts the exact same people it is supposed to help. This isn't debatable but rather verifiable fact. It is nothing more than a ploy by politicians. Looks like it worked.

In America you have waiters earning 2 dollars 15 an hour as a basic wage, you have a minimum wage of something around 7 dollars an hour.

You keep repeating the bolded part. As I stated when I ran a bar my employees averaged around $20/hr. Either you are being willfully ignorant which considering your usual miseducation on anything American is entirely possible or your are intentionally stating false information to help your own position. Regardless you should be ashamed. Minimum wage employees make up 6% of all US workers with over half of that group being part-time employees. It isn't meant to be the minimum amount for a person to live on nor do I care what it is in the UK or see how it is relevant. If it were about the minimum needed to make a living then it wouldn't be a national standard due to varying costs of living throughout the US. Which further makes my point it is nothing more than a political point used to dupe voters. If you are insistent on making the comparison, I'd suggest that the unemployment of young and unskilled in the UK is largely due to your high minimum wage.

Why should you rely on the customer to tip?

Because it is a superior system for all parties involved. I already explained why. If you'd ever worked in the US service industry then you'd realize that.

It is pure corporate greed and it doesn't take much for McDonald's to simply clean its act up and pay a fair wage.

A fair wage is exactly a fair compensation for one's labor. Flipping burgers isn't exactly a technical gig. the fact that just about any adult could do the task is indicative of the wage it commands.

If you cannot pay the worker a wage without relying on my charity

It isn't charity it is how much you feel the service was worth and a far better way to do business. You get superior service and a cheaper product, the employee gets to make a wage FAR superior than almost any hourly paid employment they could find and the employer gets a motivated employee, lower overhead and ability to hire more workers w/o raising prices. No one in the US is advocating changing this system and definitely not the service industry. You should probably mind your own business.

My first working wage almost 2 decades ago was more than double what an American waitress will recieve as a basic payment minus tips.

Yes but w/tips there are waitstaff and bartenders that probably make more than you do now. They wouldn't have it any other way.

viewpoints like yours are a problem.

Viewpoints like yours are ignorant and bigoted. Quit telling people how to run their own lives, how much of their own money they should keep and worry about your own.

[El Kabong]

VC, if miles didn't tell people how to live how would they get by

[Gandalf]

A minimum wage exists to provide a basic means to survive, or at least it should. It should be enough to cover your living costs and get by month to month. Obviously 7 US dollars does not provide that to any sufficient degree whence something like 50 million people needing food stamps. Now if there are effective controls on corporations in regards to outsourcing, unchecked immigration etc, then obviously there will still be jobs.

In regards to your abhorrent views on service industry workers, then I think you are quite repugnant. You shouldn't need to rely on the charity of a customer to top up 2.15 an hour. How about you just pay a fair wage of 20 dollars if that is what the worker will end up taking home. Instead, you are asking the worker to whore themselves to the highest paying bidder. It is sick when all you are doing at the end of the day is buying a drink.

The unemployment of young Britains today is akin to the problem in America. The minimum wage is not relevant, but what is relevent is outsourcing and unchecked immigration. I think these are serious problems and those alone will create unemployment for young natives and decrease the numbers of available jobs. I think already in the UK young workers are earning less than the minimum wage.

When it comes to dismissing people who flip burgers and clean toilets, I think you again display a pompous arrogance and disregard for important jobs. These things have to be done and in truth, not many want to do them. However, there is a demand for hygiene and certainly in your country a high demand for obesity. Again, what is the harm in paying the Mc'D's worker 18 bucks an hour? If they work hard and are helping to make the branch money then they deserve more than the bare minimum. That is where you don't value people, they are a mere commodity to be exploited. I disagree with that on political, moral, and ethical grounds.

I think you come across as someone who has been brainwashed into believing the Chicago school economics view of globalisation. Of course it has been great for the US elite, but for many Americans it means enhanced poverty and around the world it means the exploitation of labour markets. Personally, I am very much against that world view.

And yes, Lyle. Very insightful. What I encourage is that society should care more for it's home labour resources as eventually when the skeleton is stripped, the entire thing will come crashing down like a house of cards. The middle classes have been eroded for 40 years, 50 million are on food stamps, the end isn't going to be pretty. The Soviet Union collapsed after overextending itself, the US appears to be gradually getting there. The US is maybe not that far behind. I also encourage people not to take part in the consumer economy. Strip your life down to the essentials and plan well, because ultimately the pension and security you thought the state would provide might not be there. Certainly don't rely on the US dollar and make sure you know how to grow potatoes.