Marvin was BAD ASS.Bradley is like Marvin because he was not really appreciated until he beat Hearns and people started paying him respect and looking back at his career. Hagler changed his style as he got older from boxer to brawler. Bradley does not switch hit and Hagler got ripped off.The special part of Marvin was thatMarvin Hagler was just the same nothing special but just kept winning and being F awesome.then the guy is fucking awesome for not being anything special with wins over Marquez, Provodnikov, Pacquiao, Peterson, Alexander, Holt, and Witter and that's not counting his wins over older guys like Casamayor and CampbellNo special speed or power, no insane unorthodox combos, not special technique and moves, no charisma outside the ringBradley had nothing to do with the excitement?He PERSONALLY is not exciting, like Chuck Wepner was not exciting anywhere except the Ali fightI never said you hated him but you did say he was not exciting. His last 2 fights have been exactly that.
Last 2 fights? There was only 1 exciting fight because of Provodnikov
The only special thing about him is his veg diet and bodybuilder look
Solid fighter, nothing more , nothing less
1) The contrast with SRL, because marvin did it hard way from the boottom. He got looses due to judges, which built his character and made him what he became: ruthless, no compromises, do not let the victory in the hand on judgements
2) he was a WAY better brawler and boxer actually than current Bradley p4p
3) switching guards was Marvin's trademark
4) His victories were undisputed, leaving no room for doubts
Bradley is still young and has a long way to go but there are comparisons to be made. He will win you over.
I am talking about Bradley now, not in potential future. Yes, things may change, who knows


Thanks:
Likes:
Dislikes: 



Reply With Quote

Bookmarks