Enough with the Bradley hating

**Beanflicker** · 10-13-2013 03:36 PM

Hit and not get hit and being exciting are almost oxymorons (unless you're a KO artist like a Tyson or Pacquaio). As fans, the most exciting fights are when both guys are beating the shit out of each other (Gatti/Ward, Hagler/Hearns, and of course Bradley/Prod). It means taking punishment.

Boxers should have the heart to go to war, but the intelligence to avoid it when necessary.

Bradley was not going to KO JMM. He knew that, everyone knew that. He won the only way he could have, because if he chose to be exciting and exchange with JMM, he probably would have gotten KO'd. That's stupid. You can't expect guys to fight stupid just because it's more exciting for you.

**SugarBoxing** · 10-13-2013 03:37 PM

Originally Posted by Beanflicker

Hit and not get hit and being exciting are almost oxymorons (unless you're a KO artist like a Tyson or Pacquaio). As fans, the most exciting fights are when both guys are beating the shit out of each other (Gatti/Ward, Hagler/Hearns, and of course Bradley/Prod).

Discover fabulous 4 and all MW from 80'es. Now go and do homework

**Beanflicker** · 10-13-2013 03:39 PM

Originally Posted by NVSemin

Discover fabulous 4 and all MW from 80'es. Now go and do homework

You really are an idiot.

You name me any 80`s MW (Hagler, Hearns, Leonard, Duran, ect) and I`ll give you a handful of fights where they were boring because they were fighting smart.

**Beanflicker** · 10-13-2013 03:38 PM

You think Cus Dàmato or any other legendary trainer would have had Bradley fighting Prod the way he did... that`s insanity. Cus, like all great trainers, taught good fundamentals and defense. Hit without being hit is the ultimate goal.