This is so damn subjective.... depends on the criteria you use. The opening post did say "based on what he's done so far". So if you're talking purely about numbers, it's hard not to rank Wladimir either in, or near the top 5. But is that a good criteria?

If you're gonna rank all-time HW's, I'd make sure to use some of these other criteria:
  • How much they did for the sport
  • Level of opposition
  • Excitement for the fans
  • Longevity
  • Dominance
On "level of opposition" and "fan excitement", Wlad falls way way down. How much has he done for the sport? Depends who you ask, I guess. Globally, he's probably done a lot of good, as people were probably ready for a dominant HW who wasn't American. But then, that very fact seems to have drained some of the interest out of the U.S. Sad, but true.

Taking everything into consideration, and if forced to make a choice, I'd probably rank Wlad just inside the top 10, or just outside of it. Somewhere between 8 and 12.