God is a concept, By which we can measure, Our pain, I'll say it again, God is a concept, By which we can measure, Our pain, I don't believe in magic, I don't believe in I-ching, I don't believe in bible, I don't believe in tarot, I don't believe in Hitler, I don't believe in Jesus, I don't believe in Kennedy, I don't believe in Buddha, I don't believe in mantra, I don't believe in Gita, I don't believe in yoga, I don't believe in kings, I don't believe in Elvis, I don't believe in Zimmerman, I don't believe in Beatles, I just believe in me!!
To be honest in my opinion Wlad would beat Clay , I just don't see the 15 stone Clay having the power to hurt him.
Sure Wlad would be beaten by a few of the big hitters. But for me Clay was great in his era , but no way he beats everybody in the modern era.
Vitali took 4 years off while Wladimir dominated and it's Wlad that needs to prove himself? Again, Corrie Sanders is DEAD (R.I.P) so I highly doubt a rematch would be honorable or very difficult at this time you dolt. Wlad beat Sam Peter TWICE.
You keep clinging to your Mike Tyson.....he's not coming back, Teddy Atlas ain't coming back, and neither is Kevin Rooney. That style doesn't work against guys who control pace and distance and the shelf life of a guy who fights like that....maybe 2-3 peak years 5-7 at MOST. Tyson had what 4 years at his absolute peak?
I believe Wlad would win against Ali for the same reason Norton did, Ali requires you to come to him, if you're taller and got a bigger reach and ideally want your opponent to come to you too then you neutralize Ali's offense greatly. It would be a pure boxing match but Wlad would win it.
put gloves on this man, 7 foot 9 inches, he will then watch the klit-wit fights and learn there AllTime Great strategiesand even improve on them. Here are the next generation of great boxers you fools. Is this what boxing has now become. The taller the better and God forbid dont let yourself EVER get hit---ahhh dont worry, nobody can reach your chin anyway!
Well when ranking the top ten greatest you got look at a few things really. That being resume, defenses, and how long they reign over as champ. With Wald resume is the kicker really but i don't think its as bad as most think it is. Bryde, Chagve, Haye, Peter, Povetkin and Maybe Brewster besides the 70's and 90's i think those guys would be fine with most of the contenders of all the other eras not saying the champs. Not sure were to rank the man but if he keeps being champ and winning ever fight with out losing hardly any rounds its going to get hard not to.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks