do people actually think that bhop beats hagler?

[Beanz]

If they fought 3 times Hagler would win 4 of them.

[Dia bando]

Remember Hagler was feared, Hopkins is just a dirty git fucking truly terrible to watch,
about as entertaining as a shit house rat eating a turd.

[IamInuit]

You know its funny some of you scoff at Hops chances against Hagler while touting the chances of that homer Monzon. Did he ever even leave Argentina? Did he ever beat one prime middleweight in his day outside of Briscoe who almost ko'd him or Nino. Griffith and Napoles were not middles and were no where near their prime.

I can wait. Hopkins would have kicked the shit out of Monzon.

[Dia bando]

Why Hagler because Hopkins like to fight at his own pace,! Hagler would be relentless be on
him, Marvin was a excellent inside fighter, his jab would bust up Hopkins remember 15 rounds
yes and Hagler could be a dirty git as well.
Not a pretty fight to watch, but after 15 round Hagler would be king, why do I dislike Hopkins
so much, if I want wrestling I watch WWE, but this is boxing Hopkins wrestling and acting skills
are second to none.

[powerpuncher]

Why Hagler because Hopkins like to fight at his own pace,! Hagler would be relentless be on
him, Marvin was a excellent inside fighter, his jab would bust up Hopkins remember 15 rounds
yes and Hagler could be a dirty git as well.
Not a pretty fight to watch, but after 15 round Hagler would be king, why do I dislike Hopkins
so much, if I want wrestling I watch WWE, but this is boxing Hopkins wrestling and acting skills
are second to none.

i agree 100%

[Beanflicker]

I don't mind people picking Hagler (truth be told I like Hagler a HELL OF A LOT more than I like Bhop), but there's way too much BS being spoken here about Bhop.

It's strange that to this day people still underestimate Bhop and don't understand his style or what he brings to the table.

Someone above even said "bhop likes to fight at his own pace, hagler would push the pace on him". That right there shows a complete inability to grasp what Bhop actually does.

[IamInuit]

I don't mind people picking Hagler (truth be told I like Hagler a HELL OF A LOT more than I like Bhop), but there's way too much BS being spoken here about Bhop.

It's strange that to this day people still underestimate Bhop and don't understand his style or what he brings to the table.

Someone above even said "bhop likes to fight at his own pace, hagler would push the pace on him". That right there shows a complete inability to grasp what Bhop actually does.

And almost worship a guy in Monzon who might have fought 2 B level middleweights over a career or maybe 3 if you include Denny Moyer. Most of Monzons career is spoon fed like the 7-6-3 Estra in 69 or Eddie Pace in 1970 who was 32-22-1 followed by Rosa who was 7-2-0 then jumping to the always dangerous Guerrero in 1971 who was 3-5-1 at the time.

I don't like to use these terms to much but here you have the most overrated fighter in history or at least one of them verses perhaps the most underrated of all time.

[powerpuncher]

You know its funny some of you scoff at Hops chances against Hagler while touting the chances of that homer Monzon. Did he ever even leave Argentina? Did he ever beat one prime middleweight in his day outside of Briscoe who almost ko'd him or Nino. Griffith and Napoles were not middles and were no where near their prime.

I can wait. Hopkins would have kicked the shit out of Monzon.

monzon is even more of a nightmare match up for bhop than hagler. monzon would keep him on the outside of his jab and right hand all match.