Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
That's a fantastic idea, lets punish the guy that got knocked out because he didn't provide the spectacle we expected. We have no evidence whatsoever that it was a fix, but maybe he quit through fear, which obviously deserves the gallows.

On the contrary, let's reward Scott for a fantastic, competitive showing by giving him a shot at a title.
Dare we say "PPV"?
What title shot is he getting?

Who cares? Leapfrog the bastard. After that sterling performance, he merits rewarding.
Don't you think?
After all...... you didn't like the first idea.
So are you now saying Scott is not getting a title shot on the back of that performance? It's a bit unclear.

Try to stay with me, sport. It was likely fear that kept the man down. According to you, he deserves the gallows. Of course, you're being sarcastic ('cause that's what you do), which means you think he deserves kudos for his performance. Follow me so far? So to be agreeable, I carry it a step further and say he deserves a title shot, preferably PPV (answering sarcasm with sarcasm). Then, in a state of faked confusion, you inquire as to what title shot he is getting. Which just gets us right back where we started, which is to say Scott turned in a pitiful, shameful performance and decided to stay down..... which IMO warrants him getting some sort of punishment. You obviously disagree, which means you're wrong. Not that there's any shame in that.

Hope this helps.