Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 38 of 38

Thread: Foreman & Hopkins in their 40s- whose run was more impressive?

Share/Bookmark
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Northern Canada
    Posts
    9,793
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    986
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Foreman & Hopkins in their 40s- whose run was more impressive?

    Foremans time off after finding god at the end of Youngs fist can just as easily delete him from the question. Hopkins has fought non stop almost as long as Archie Moore and has accomplished much more in the process.

    Hopkins and its not all that close.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    46,916
    Mentioned
    438 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5110
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Foreman & Hopkins in their 40s- whose run was more impressive?

    Quote Originally Posted by Hulk View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by mikeeod View Post
    Master u r correct. Not even disputable. Moorer had a china chin, Axel Schulz, Alex Stewart and Tommy Mortison were club fighters at best. Briggs is a joke. Evander was good but George lost clearly in that one. Cooney was a dinosaur, and Bert Cooper was too small and high on drugs.

    Compare that to Pascal, Cloud, Beibut, Pavilik, Joe C, Tarver, Dawson n soon Stevenson. How many P4P ranked (at the time of the fight) is in that list? Multiple, n I forgot to mention Winky on that list as well. Really, Hop was already old at 36 when he destroyed Tito, but I wanted to limit it to guys he fought while over 40.

    The one guy Georfe fought who was ranked p4p at the time they fought was Evander n he lost that one. George is an ATG heavyweight n a great man, but not anywhere near Hop in terms of accomplishment. Hop is a master at his craft. Too bad boxing fans today don't know enough about the sport to appreciate it.

    Hopkins run has lasted longer and is more impressive.


    However, Tommy Morrison was NOT a club fighter. He was a top contender and WBO champ.
    Morrison proved legit in the short aftermath but had Hell with guys a top contender should not have in Williams and Hipp just prior. Arum saw a money fiesta that could not lose, and a chance for Tommy to take his ranking. Seems some always forget about the Stewart fight that left Foreman a mashed up mess, that was razor thin. I think Morrison studied that one..he boxed with a nice jab v Foreman. Kept a level smart head.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,098
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3092
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Foreman & Hopkins in their 40s- whose run was more impressive?

    Quote Originally Posted by Spicoli View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Hulk View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by mikeeod View Post
    Master u r correct. Not even disputable. Moorer had a china chin, Axel Schulz, Alex Stewart and Tommy Mortison were club fighters at best. Briggs is a joke. Evander was good but George lost clearly in that one. Cooney was a dinosaur, and Bert Cooper was too small and high on drugs.

    Compare that to Pascal, Cloud, Beibut, Pavilik, Joe C, Tarver, Dawson n soon Stevenson. How many P4P ranked (at the time of the fight) is in that list? Multiple, n I forgot to mention Winky on that list as well. Really, Hop was already old at 36 when he destroyed Tito, but I wanted to limit it to guys he fought while over 40.

    The one guy Georfe fought who was ranked p4p at the time they fought was Evander n he lost that one. George is an ATG heavyweight n a great man, but not anywhere near Hop in terms of accomplishment. Hop is a master at his craft. Too bad boxing fans today don't know enough about the sport to appreciate it.

    Hopkins run has lasted longer and is more impressive.


    However, Tommy Morrison was NOT a club fighter. He was a top contender and WBO champ.
    Morrison proved legit in the short aftermath but had Hell with guys a top contender should not have in Williams and Hipp just prior. Arum saw a money fiesta that could not lose, and a chance for Tommy to take his ranking. Seems some always forget about the Stewart fight that left Foreman a mashed up mess, that was razor thin. I think Morrison studied that one..he boxed with a nice jab v Foreman. Kept a level smart head.
    Yes, Foreman picked Tommy because he thought he would come to him and had a weak chin. That fight did not plan out as Big George expected.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Las Vegas, NV USA
    Posts
    659
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    672
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Foreman was a better champion. Hop is a clown. Why else would you choose to wear an alien mask. He's a marvel because of his age. He's a sideshow. A guiness book of records freakshow.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    2,012
    Mentioned
    64 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    625
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Foreman & Hopkins in their 40s- whose run was more impressive?

    I love Foreman, he's a good fella.

    But come off the grass, Hopkins is a superb boxer.

    George Foreman always was nothing more than a big guy with a big punch and a solid chin!

    He did not even learn HOW to box UNTIL he was in his 40's!

    "Enough with the games mate! Your messing with the Grand Master!"

    Lennox Lewis

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,098
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3092
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Foreman & Hopkins in their 40s- whose run was more impressive?

    Quote Originally Posted by DannyV297 View Post
    Foreman was a better champion. Hop is a clown. Why else would you choose to wear an alien mask. He's a marvel because of his age. He's a sideshow. A guiness book of records freakshow.
    How was Foreman a better champion? He was a poor champion.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    2,012
    Mentioned
    64 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    625
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Foreman & Hopkins in their 40s- whose run was more impressive?

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by DannyV297 View Post
    Foreman was a better champion. Hop is a clown. Why else would you choose to wear an alien mask. He's a marvel because of his age. He's a sideshow. A guiness book of records freakshow.
    How was Foreman a better champion? He was a poor champion.
    Yes and some have called Foreman's return a sideshow also.

    He only defended that title twice in the 70's against Ken Norton and Jose Roman (one of the saddest boxing matches I have ever seen!)

    Then after he won the title via getting the shit punched out of him and scoring a lucky shot against a stupid opponent he declined to face his mandatories and trickled all his belts away.

    Sorry but that's not a really great champion.
    "Enough with the games mate! Your messing with the Grand Master!"

    Lennox Lewis

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,098
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3092
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Foreman & Hopkins in their 40s- whose run was more impressive?

    I think Moored never fought a top 10 fighter to get his title shot. He beat Holyfield who was one punch away from a heart attack and had an injured shoulder. Even then Holyfield put Moorer down.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. More Impressive ?
    By Truth in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 09-21-2009, 10:21 AM
  2. Most impressive title run
    By Motor City Cobra in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 44
    Last Post: 06-20-2009, 07:05 AM
  3. Which would be more impressive?
    By JonesJrMayweather in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 05-08-2009, 11:56 AM
  4. 70's Foreman VS 90's Foreman
    By JT Rock in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 08-22-2007, 04:00 PM
  5. Demetrius Hopkins scores yet another impressive KO
    By Wacko3205 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-11-2006, 09:40 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing