Foreman & Hopkins in their 40s- whose run was more impressive?

**Master** · 04-21-2014 09:24 AM

Originally Posted by DannyV297

Foreman was a better champion. Hop is a clown. Why else would you choose to wear an alien mask. He's a marvel because of his age. He's a sideshow. A guiness book of records freakshow.

How was Foreman a better champion? He was a poor champion.

**Max Power** · 04-21-2014 10:07 AM

Originally Posted by Master

Originally Posted by DannyV297

Foreman was a better champion. Hop is a clown. Why else would you choose to wear an alien mask. He's a marvel because of his age. He's a sideshow. A guiness book of records freakshow.

How was Foreman a better champion? He was a poor champion.

Yes and some have called Foreman's return a sideshow also.

He only defended that title twice in the 70's against Ken Norton and Jose Roman (one of the saddest boxing matches I have ever seen!)

Then after he won the title via getting the shit punched out of him and scoring a lucky shot against a stupid opponent he declined to face his mandatories and trickled all his belts away.

Sorry but that's not a really great champion.

**Master** · 04-21-2014 10:30 AM

I think Moored never fought a top 10 fighter to get his title shot. He beat Holyfield who was one punch away from a heart attack and had an injured shoulder. Even then Holyfield put Moorer down.