Foreman & Hopkins in their 40s- whose run was more impressive?

[DannyV297]

Foreman was a better champion. Hop is a clown. Why else would you choose to wear an alien mask. He's a marvel because of his age. He's a sideshow. A guiness book of records freakshow.

[Max Power]

I love Foreman, he's a good fella.

But come off the grass, Hopkins is a superb boxer.

George Foreman always was nothing more than a big guy with a big punch and a solid chin!

He did not even learn HOW to box UNTIL he was in his 40's!

[Master]

Foreman was a better champion. Hop is a clown. Why else would you choose to wear an alien mask. He's a marvel because of his age. He's a sideshow. A guiness book of records freakshow.

How was Foreman a better champion? He was a poor champion.

[Max Power]

Foreman was a better champion. Hop is a clown. Why else would you choose to wear an alien mask. He's a marvel because of his age. He's a sideshow. A guiness book of records freakshow.

How was Foreman a better champion? He was a poor champion.

Yes and some have called Foreman's return a sideshow also.

He only defended that title twice in the 70's against Ken Norton and Jose Roman (one of the saddest boxing matches I have ever seen!)

Then after he won the title via getting the shit punched out of him and scoring a lucky shot against a stupid opponent he declined to face his mandatories and trickled all his belts away.

Sorry but that's not a really great champion.

[Master]

I think Moored never fought a top 10 fighter to get his title shot. He beat Holyfield who was one punch away from a heart attack and had an injured shoulder. Even then Holyfield put Moorer down.