Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 45

Thread: Subpar Foe Doesn't Mean Klitschko's Not An All-Timer

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,645
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1115
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Subpar Foe Doesn't Mean Klitschko's Not An All-Timer

    Eric not getting better when they leave dude just going to fighters worse then them pretty much. Might get more exciting i guess but in truth the level will go down. I may just disagree with you hear but out of all Walds fights i only think maybe 15 percent of them were he really over did but to each his own.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    957
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Subpar Foe Doesn't Mean Klitschko's Not An All-Timer

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr140 View Post
    Eric not getting better when they leave dude just going to fighters worse then them pretty much. Might get more exciting i guess but in truth the level will go down. I may just disagree with you hear but out of all Walds fights i only think maybe 15 percent of them were he really over did but to each his own.
    yep, if you dont think that what wlad is doing is extreme blatent cheating then each to their own as you say

    ill have to disagree with on your opinion that it wont get better once hes gone too

    i think its will get a lot better, there might be a short low period, but once that is done we could have some exciting title fights again, only sticking point is if we get another wlad opperation taking over
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,645
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1115
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Subpar Foe Doesn't Mean Klitschko's Not An All-Timer

    Not many big men are like the Brothers for there size they are way fast and can really box when they feel like it only Bowie and Lewis were like them. I am pretty sure there won't be a reigning champ but the talent pool right now is not a good one really and the eastern Europeans are kinda kings of hws now.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    957
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Subpar Foe Doesn't Mean Klitschko's Not An All-Timer

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr140 View Post
    Not many big men are like the Brothers for there size they are way fast and can really box when they feel like it only Bowie and Lewis were like them. I am pretty sure there won't be a reigning champ but the talent pool right now is not a good one really and the eastern Europeans are kinda kings of hws now.
    thats an opinion, mine is much more positive on the state of the division without wlad

    like ive said a number of times i think wlad would have been beaten off at least one of his opponents over the last several years if he was made to fight within the rules

    but lets say wlads cheating isnt cheating, lets say holding is in the rules, id rather have 5 years of less tallent and more excitement, id like to enjoy a HW title fight again

    mind you the main reason i dont enjoy them is because wlad is allowed to cheat so much, if he wasnt his fights would undoubtably more exciting
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    2,012
    Mentioned
    64 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    639
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Subpar Foe Doesn't Mean Klitschko's Not An All-Timer

    Forget the Povetkin fight for a minute, we know that was the worst right.

    Compare it to Sam Peter fight, there are more and more dirtier clinches in the Frazier fight than there were in Wlad's first fight with Peter.

    What is it about Wlad that constitutes cheating to you? I'm confused now.

    The whole holding thing got massively exaggerated after Povetkin as if he ONLY won that way.

    Yet BEFORE that fight he was accused of it only mildly and more criticised for his endless jabbing.
    "Enough with the games mate! Your messing with the Grand Master!"

    Lennox Lewis

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    957
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Subpar Foe Doesn't Mean Klitschko's Not An All-Timer

    Quote Originally Posted by Max Power View Post
    Forget the Povetkin fight for a minute, we know that was the worst right.

    Compare it to Sam Peter fight, there are more and more dirtier clinches in the Frazier fight than there were in Wlad's first fight with Peter.

    What is it about Wlad that constitutes cheating to you? I'm confused now.

    The whole holding thing got massively exaggerated after Povetkin as if he ONLY won that way.

    Yet BEFORE that fight he was accused of it only mildly and more criticised for his endless jabbing.
    nope there definately wasnt

    and i was of the opinion that wlad hurrendously excessively cheated by holding long before the provetkin fight, the provetkin fight was just funny

    it amazes me that people actually defend it

    it would be one thing if he adopted an exciting method of cheating, id accept people defending it because they enjoyed watching it
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    2,012
    Mentioned
    64 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    639
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Subpar Foe Doesn't Mean Klitschko's Not An All-Timer

    Well I don't condone the Povetkin fights holding, that was a bit much for me. I will defend him in the light of Muhammad Ali and John Ruiz employing similar or in my opinion worse tactics to win regularly.

    As I said once before, Wladimir only clinches those short ass opponents who rush at him. If they tried to BOX Wlad they would get their face punched in. Wlad's optimal place to have his opponent, where he wants them, is at the end of his jab and later his right.

    Foreman pushed his opponents off him to get them there. Wladimir grabs them and then seperates. I don't think that's cheating. I think it's a legal clinch. You cannot eliminate it from boxing, you must learn to clinch to survive.
    "Enough with the games mate! Your messing with the Grand Master!"

    Lennox Lewis

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-28-2013, 05:25 PM
  2. Replies: 34
    Last Post: 08-01-2011, 04:49 PM
  3. Ring Timer
    By gally in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-02-2010, 02:06 AM
  4. Cheap round timer
    By killersheep in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-15-2006, 06:47 AM
  5. Round timer?
    By gally in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 07-12-2006, 06:22 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing