Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 20 of 20

Thread: WBA,WBC,IBF agree

Share/Bookmark
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Northern Canada
    Posts
    9,793
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    990
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: WBA,WBC,IBF agree

    Quote Originally Posted by Spicoli View Post
    I think the alphabet boy syndicates are slowly coming to the realization that they are on borrowed time and are largely viewed as irrelevant. We really don't "need" some tournament charade for the fans to tell us who is actually "the man" to beat in at least half the divisions as it is. I can't see any substantive move as far as the standardizations put forth without State commissions and boards conducting themselves in the same way. This is just letting the clowns run the operations of the circus. Hell, we have a couple States who have to actually 'borrow' commissions right now. The absolute first thing they need to do is encourage and abide by a unified champion and not roadblock it with obscure manufactured mandatories simply to collect sanctioning fees.
    Salient points my friend. And if by chance they do sort something out, the youngin WBO will become a paper weight.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Northern Canada
    Posts
    9,793
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    990
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: WBA,WBC,IBF agree

    I find it odd that my friends at the summit did not discuss the elimination of aluminum, copper, silver, interim, recess & emeritus titles.
    LOL

    Paco Valcarcel- WBO PRES.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    47,002
    Mentioned
    438 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5115
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: WBA,WBC,IBF agree

    Quote Originally Posted by IamInuit View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Spicoli View Post
    I think the alphabet boy syndicates are slowly coming to the realization that they are on borrowed time and are largely viewed as irrelevant. We really don't "need" some tournament charade for the fans to tell us who is actually "the man" to beat in at least half the divisions as it is. I can't see any substantive move as far as the standardizations put forth without State commissions and boards conducting themselves in the same way. This is just letting the clowns run the operations of the circus. Hell, we have a couple States who have to actually 'borrow' commissions right now. The absolute first thing they need to do is encourage and abide by a unified champion and not roadblock it with obscure manufactured mandatories simply to collect sanctioning fees.
    Salient points my friend. And if by chance they do sort something out, the youngin WBO will become a paper weight.
    I think they've collectively been in the running for "Supe Cubic Zirconia Paper Bag Champion" for years

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    5,971
    Mentioned
    121 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    815
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: WBA,WBC,IBF agree

    Quote Originally Posted by La Cucaracha View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ykdadamaja View Post
    Most likely country-specific athletics boards, and most powerful the USA Athletics board and congress, has asked them to think very seriously about this flap doodle.

    Right now, having any or the other title is meaningless. Who gives a fuck about the WBO belt when you have the IBF and WBA? Who gives a fuck about the WBC when you have the IBF and WBO straps? See the picture? Throw in there the Ring title, and one can see how potential revenue is being lost on good fighters being relegated to non descript positions.

    When the belts are fragmented like this, then it should be automatic that one champ fights the other champ. AUTOMATIC.
    Easier said than done with these money grabbing scums
    It's the only way to save their reputations. Shoots, we don't even need them to make big money fights anymore. We know who we wanna pay to see fight.
    Bigger man George, bigger punch!

    Subscribe: Free online Classifieds and Business directory!
    Hidden Content

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    5,971
    Mentioned
    121 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    815
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: WBA,WBC,IBF agree

    .... and, with sanctioning fees for each organization, it can become costly for fighters and promoters to keep more than one belt. Why would I pay sanctioning fees to two orgs when I am only going to fight one guy? lolololol...
    Bigger man George, bigger punch!

    Subscribe: Free online Classifieds and Business directory!
    Hidden Content

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Who do you agree with GB or TR?
    By DannyV297 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 04-06-2014, 09:06 PM
  2. Can we agree....
    By Pugilistic in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 06-26-2009, 01:28 PM
  3. Do you agree with this statements?
    By XaduBoxer in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 70
    Last Post: 10-01-2008, 09:58 AM
  4. Experts Agree...
    By Deanrw in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 02-07-2008, 09:56 PM
  5. can we all agree?
    By JonesJrMayweather in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-29-2007, 01:18 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing