Amir Khan arrested for assault

[AdamGB]

I thought I already had... This is why I'm saying we're at an impass.

[Fenster]

Can you put it in layman's terms please? (this is not an argument)

[Master]

Can you put it in layman's terms please? (this is not an argument)

When he says laymans terms he means very basic for thick people.

[Master]

Amir Khan has been notified that any allegations against him following his arrest on suspicion of assault have been dropped.

It was reported on Friday that Khan had been arrested by the Greater Manchester Police on suspicion of assaulting two men in Bolton.

And whilst the Greater Manchester Police released a statement regarding the arrest, 27-year-old Khan took to Twitter in the hope of quashing the speculation.

However, it has since been confirmed that Khan was involved in the incident, but all allegations have now been dropped.

Amir Khan was arrested during the early hours of Friday 4th July on suspicion of common assault against two youths. Shortly thereafter he was released on police bail pending further enquiries.

This was a minor incident involving a misunderstanding between Amir Khan and two other youths.

On Monday 7th July Amir was notified by the police that the allegations against him had been withdrawn and the matter would not be pursued any further.

https://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com/news/...5057--box.html

[Kirkland Laing]

It's a scientific fact that he paid them to withdraw the charges.

[Beanz]

It's a scientific fact that he paid them to withdraw the charges.

How is it Scientific ? I can accept that it may well be a fact but what makes it scientific ?

Is it really quite terrific?
Or maybe just specific,
not soporific or horrific
non specific or hieroglyphic
is it really scientific?

[SugarBoxing]

as a scientist, I would like to clarify for you "scientific facts"

there are 2 types

1. consequences of very basic and fundamental theories. As long as there are no contradictions found with regards to the foundations of the theory, you may take its consequences as facts. Otherwise you got paradoxes
2. experimental evidence. When you read some yellow page journal "Recently, British scientists proved that women with small boobs have higher IQ, etc" it only means that they did a FINITE number of experiments or tests, and, here is the key, using some model of assessing the data (see point 1), came to a particular conclusions based on statistics.

T0 sum up,

"No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right; a single experiment can prove me wrong.

Albert Einstein ( A jew)"

[Kirkland Laing]

It's a scientific fact that he paid them to withdraw the charges.

How is it Scientific ? I can accept that it may well be a fact but what makes it scientific ?

Is it really quite terrific?
Or maybe just specific,
not soporific or horrific
non specific or hieroglyphic
is it really scientific?

This guy says so.

[Fenster]

Can you put it in layman's terms please? (this is not an argument)

When he says laymans terms he means very basic for thick people.

I didn't even mention his spelling.

[Andre]

Can you put it in layman's terms please? (this is not an argument)

I think he is trying to say that people who say Science is correct in evolution therefore God botherers are incorrect. Are as stupid as those who believe in fairtales.

Im with that because the message behind the fairy tales is different from the actual fairy tale; because people back in those times couldnt have it explained to them any other way than father figure Mother figure tiers of power from the stars down to them and be good for fucks sake etc.

Same as science (nuts and bolts material study) couldnt explain that we are all made from invisible pieces of energy that was all from a Sun that once exploded and now that energy has been compressed down into material in a lower vibrating dimension so that you can feel shit and experience it 'for real materially'. Also that the energy has electrical impulses and how you feel and what you do effects your state physically and those around you because the energy has effects outside of the material it manifests.

Now science couldnt prove that in a fit and neither could religion so they oppose themselves where as the truth is over there not with them although they both have valid points.

Physics on the other hand has proven it and some scientists and strict nuts and bolts thinking evolutionists still dont like it, some agnotics dont like it and some religious who have been told to have faith only dont like it either. Because its all tending to point in a spirit (invisible) direction for the answers behind the energy which is 'materially speaking' frequencies vibrating light and electromagnetic energy into different densities of harmony and dis harmony that has been given some sort of dimensional freedom to evolve as it will.

[Fenster]

Can you put it in layman's terms please? (this is not an argument)

I think he is trying to say that people who say Science is correct in evolution therefore God botherers are incorrect. Are as stupid as those who believe in fairtales.

Im with that because the message behind the fairy tales is different from the actual fairy tale; because people back in those times couldnt have it explained to them any other way than father figure Mother figure tiers of power from the stars down to them and be good for fucks sake etc.

Same as science (nuts and bolts material study) couldnt explain that we are all made from invisible pieces of energy that was all from a Sun that once exploded and now that energy has been compressed down into material in a lower vibrating dimension so that you can feel shit and experience it 'for real materially'. Also that the energy has electrical impulses and how you feel and what you do effects your state physically and those around you because the energy has effects outside of the material it manifests.

Now science couldnt prove that in a fit and neither could religion so they oppose themselves where as the truth is over there not with them although they both have valid points.

Physics on the other hand has proven it and some scientists and strict nuts and bolts thinking evolutionists still dont like it, some agnotics dont like it and some religious who have been told to have faith only dont like it either. Because its all tending to point in a spirit (invisible) direction for the answers behind the energy which is 'materially speaking' frequencies vibrating light and electromagnetic energy into different densities of harmony and dis harmony that has been given some sort of dimensional freedom to evolve as it will.

What is a "strict nuts and bolts thinking evolutionist?"

[Andre]

Physical only dudes you know the measurement nuts and bolts only type 'If I cant see something, feel it or measure it, I cant believe in it'.

[Fenster]

Physical only dudes you know the measurement nuts and bolts only type 'If I cant see something, feel it or measure it, I cant believe in it'.

So if you believe in nothing it requires faith?

[Master]

I had a nice boxing related thread Amir Khan going to mosque and beating up two 19 year olds and we end up with this.