Quote Originally Posted by IamInuit View Post
Like I said, probably the dumbest premise in boxing. "I have to see it" Now apply that flawed belief to everything. Its inane. Its like dismissing all of human history.

I cant be bothered. Total waste of time. Every once in awhile I will call you a dufus but other then that fill your boots. You probably think Beiber is better then the Band and that the acting in Star Trek is better then To Kill a Mocking Bird.
You always get huffy, go back to the same old stock ad hominem and accuse me of not knowing anything about boxing pre-1990, you insult my judgement/taste, but you never engage and offer anything of substance to back up your opinion.

It's not an "I Have to see it" argument. We have tape on Wlad, we have tape on Tunney. Gene had some wars with Greb, but what's his most famous fight? The fight considered to be his proudest moment? The fight with Dempsey. We have that on tape.



I'd love for someone to tell me what exactly he does better than Wlad. I'm not interested in statistics, records, whatever, I'd love for someone who understands the art of boxing to tell me what he does better than Wlad. He was a better mover and more agile, that's for sure, given his much smaller size. But what did he do technically that was so much better than Wlad?