
Originally Posted by
El Kabong

Wow.....ok there Stretch Armstrong, don't hurt yourself
Stretch was exactly what I was thinking... My opinion on Fury aside, lets follow this logic using nothing but performances (and in the case of Wlad-Vitali, Wlad's admission that Vitali could beat him)
> donates greater than, = donates equal or close to, < donates lesser than
Following Ross' 'logic':
Chisora = Vitali > Wlad
So:
Fury > Chisora > Wlad
Only problem is:
Haye > Chisora, but if Chisora = Vitali > Wlad, why did Haye < Wlad?
and if Haye > Chisora x 4 (he beat Chisora in a quarter of the time Fury did), that places him above Fury if we follow your logic.
Haye > Fury > Chisora = Vitali > Wlad (not sure where to fit Lewis in all this, your logic got too convoluted to attempt to follow by that point). The guy at the bottom of that huge stretch you made somehow shutout the guy at the top, so I think we'll agree that using Dereck fucking Chisora as some sort of benchmark test for heavyweights from 2000-2015 is fucking ridiculous thing to do?...
Surely you're not stupid enough not to recognise the stage that Lewis was at in his career when he fought Vitali, the stage on his career Vitali was at when he fought Lewis and the stage he was at when he fought Chisora and realise that the stages between the three are so wide that drawing anything thing from it is impossible?
Not to much that Vitali scored a clear win on the cards over Chisora, he just had to work a little bit more than if they'd fought 3-4 years or more ago. A young Vitali had Lewis in a competitive dog fight.
Not to mention that fighter A beating fighter B and then fighter C beating fighter A doesn't mean that C beats B? Just look at Ali, Frazier and Foreman's round robin to see how flawed that logic has been proven to be...
You have to be posting stupid shit for a reaction at this point Ross?
Bookmarks