Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 46

Thread: 2002 Lennox Lewis vs 1988 Mike Tyson

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    1,556
    Mentioned
    25 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    774
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: 2002 Lennox Lewis vs 1988 Mike Tyson

    Quote Originally Posted by ross View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by mikeeod View Post
    Fascinating match up, in my opinion. Right off the bat we all have to admit that if Rahman and McCall could stop Zlennox with one shot, Tyson could also. So... Tyson will always have that punchers chance in this match up.

    Looking at the fighters and their mentality objectively, however, we all have to admit that Tyson always struggled vs large, physical fighters and those who jabbed well. I also feel that Lennox was vulnerable when he overlooked his opponent as evidenced by his fights vs. McCall, Rahman, Bruno, and Mercer, to name a few. Lennox would not take Tyson lightly, and I feel like Lennox was most dominant in fights vs those he viewed as dangerous, such as Tua, Grant, Ruddock, and Golota.

    Lennox's size, boxing ability, jab, and smothering tactics would alwZys trouble Tyson. Mike was extremely fast and aggressive in his prime, so a knockout of Lewis is always a realistic possibility. I think the more likely outcome, however, is that Lennox breaks Mike down with the jab, leaning on Tyson and smothering him inside, before landing the big shots late for the stoppage. Just my take though...
    You basing that on the actual fight which sounds ridiculous. Would you say Holmes stops or even beats a young Ali?

    Would you say Marciano stops or beats a young Louis?

    Fighters need the reflexes and skills that made them succesfull in the first place and Mikes had long gone at the point they fought.

    When you say struggled you mean had to go to points because those fights he struggled in he still completely dominated unlike Lewis who should have lost against Mercer. Lews struggled with fighters who put it on him. Mavrovich had Lewis on the ropes in parts of their fight.

    Lewis never had a prolonged period of dominance because of thise knockout losses. There was never a point in his career where people thought he was unbeatable unlike Mike Tyson.
    I would argue that Lennox was dominant for a longer time than Tyson. Lewis lost to McCall in the mid-90s and Rahman in 2000/01 time frame, and avenged both losses. The truth is that Tyson never fought a complete, large heavyweight who wasn't terrified of him until Buster Douglas. Douglas, Lennox, and Evander all used the jab to control and punish Tyson. Mike was well past his best vs Lennox, but was considered the baddest man on the planet when he faced the other two. Additionally, while he did win those fights vs Tucker, Ruddock, and Smith, he did struggle with their sheer size, and none were ANYWHERE near the complete/elite fighter that 2002 Lennox was.

    For your other questions, I think Holmes gives Ali fits prime vs prime, and Louis beats Marciano, but takes some serious punishment in the process.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,309
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3107
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: 2002 Lennox Lewis vs 1988 Mike Tyson

    Tyson did not struggle with big fighters he beat them relatively easy it is just that you could count on one hand the moments of success they had ie Tucker right uppercut 2nd round, Bonecrusher right hand in 12th round ect

    That was how good Tyson was.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Crawley, West Sussex
    Posts
    4,253
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1193
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: 2002 Lennox Lewis vs 1988 Mike Tyson

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Tyson did not struggle with big fighters he beat them relatively easy it is just that you could count on one hand the moments of success they had ie Tucker right uppercut 2nd round, Bonecrusher right hand in 12th round ect

    That was how good Tyson was.
    You are right to point out pre 1990 that he did not struggle to beat the bigger physical fighters. But he clearly had periods of frustration against Tillis, Green, Ribalta, Smith and Tucker, as all five used their size to neutralize his awesome offence, but at a cost of very limited offence in return.
    "Boxing is like jazz. The better it is, the less people appreciate it."

    George Foreman

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,309
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3107
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: 2002 Lennox Lewis vs 1988 Mike Tyson

    Quote Originally Posted by Britkid View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Tyson did not struggle with big fighters he beat them relatively easy it is just that you could count on one hand the moments of success they had ie Tucker right uppercut 2nd round, Bonecrusher right hand in 12th round ect

    That was how good Tyson was.
    You are right to point out pre 1990 that he did not struggle to beat the bigger physical fighters. But he clearly had periods of frustration against Tillis, Green, Ribalta, Smith and Tucker, as all five used their size to neutralize his awesome offence, but at a cost of very limited offence in return.
    Which is where I think Lennox would fight too defensively and lose the fight albeit by decision.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Crawley, West Sussex
    Posts
    4,253
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1193
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: 2002 Lennox Lewis vs 1988 Mike Tyson

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Britkid View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Tyson did not struggle with big fighters he beat them relatively easy it is just that you could count on one hand the moments of success they had ie Tucker right uppercut 2nd round, Bonecrusher right hand in 12th round ect

    That was how good Tyson was.
    You are right to point out pre 1990 that he did not struggle to beat the bigger physical fighters. But he clearly had periods of frustration against Tillis, Green, Ribalta, Smith and Tucker, as all five used their size to neutralize his awesome offence, but at a cost of very limited offence in return.
    Which is where I think Lennox would fight too defensively and lose the fight albeit by decision.
    Lewis was as defensively sound as any of them fighters, but his offence blows them all out the water and only Smith can claim parity in the power stakes.

    Tyson never won a fight that was in the balance after six rounds, Lewis always found a way to beat his opponent in the end, from that position.

    The only hope for Tyson is that Lewis' alter ego Lummox shows up, and then Mike can win a shootout inside four rounds.
    Last edited by Britkid; 11-13-2015 at 04:55 AM.
    "Boxing is like jazz. The better it is, the less people appreciate it."

    George Foreman

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,309
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3107
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: 2002 Lennox Lewis vs 1988 Mike Tyson

    Quote Originally Posted by Britkid View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Britkid View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Tyson did not struggle with big fighters he beat them relatively easy it is just that you could count on one hand the moments of success they had ie Tucker right uppercut 2nd round, Bonecrusher right hand in 12th round ect

    That was how good Tyson was.
    You are right to point out pre 1990 that he did not struggle to beat the bigger physical fighters. But he clearly had periods of frustration against Tillis, Green, Ribalta, Smith and Tucker, as all five used their size to neutralize his awesome offence, but at a cost of very limited offence in return.
    Which is where I think Lennox would fight too defensively and lose the fight albeit by decision.
    Lewis was as defensively sound as any of them fighters, but his offence blows them all out the water and only Smith can claim parity in the power stakes.

    Tyson never won a fight that was in the balance after six rounds, Lewis always found a way to beat his opponent in the end, from that position.

    The only hope for Tyson is that Lewis' alter ego Lummox shows up, and then Mike can win a shootout inside four rounds.
    No doubt Lewis was better than Tyson's opponents he beat during that period but not good enough to beat Tyson.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3125
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: 2002 Lennox Lewis vs 1988 Mike Tyson

    Reading through the thread i've decided Lewis would have beat prime Mike. Too strong, too intelligent. However, prime Mike would start favourite over any heavyweight in history.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Guernsey, Channel Islands
    Posts
    8,719
    Mentioned
    208 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1396
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: 2002 Lennox Lewis vs 1988 Mike Tyson

    Quote Originally Posted by mikeeod View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ross View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by mikeeod View Post
    Fascinating match up, in my opinion. Right off the bat we all have to admit that if Rahman and McCall could stop Zlennox with one shot, Tyson could also. So... Tyson will always have that punchers chance in this match up.

    Looking at the fighters and their mentality objectively, however, we all have to admit that Tyson always struggled vs large, physical fighters and those who jabbed well. I also feel that Lennox was vulnerable when he overlooked his opponent as evidenced by his fights vs. McCall, Rahman, Bruno, and Mercer, to name a few. Lennox would not take Tyson lightly, and I feel like Lennox was most dominant in fights vs those he viewed as dangerous, such as Tua, Grant, Ruddock, and Golota.

    Lennox's size, boxing ability, jab, and smothering tactics would alwZys trouble Tyson. Mike was extremely fast and aggressive in his prime, so a knockout of Lewis is always a realistic possibility. I think the more likely outcome, however, is that Lennox breaks Mike down with the jab, leaning on Tyson and smothering him inside, before landing the big shots late for the stoppage. Just my take though...
    You basing that on the actual fight which sounds ridiculous. Would you say Holmes stops or even beats a young Ali?

    Would you say Marciano stops or beats a young Louis?

    Fighters need the reflexes and skills that made them succesfull in the first place and Mikes had long gone at the point they fought.

    When you say struggled you mean had to go to points because those fights he struggled in he still completely dominated unlike Lewis who should have lost against Mercer. Lews struggled with fighters who put it on him. Mavrovich had Lewis on the ropes in parts of their fight.

    Lewis never had a prolonged period of dominance because of thise knockout losses. There was never a point in his career where people thought he was unbeatable unlike Mike Tyson.
    I would argue that Lennox was dominant for a longer time than Tyson. Lewis lost to McCall in the mid-90s and Rahman in 2000/01 time frame, and avenged both losses. The truth is that Tyson never fought a complete, large heavyweight who wasn't terrified of him until Buster Douglas. Douglas, Lennox, and Evander all used the jab to control and punish Tyson. Mike was well past his best vs Lennox, but was considered the baddest man on the planet when he faced the other two. Additionally, while he did win those fights vs Tucker, Ruddock, and Smith, he did struggle with their sheer size, and none were ANYWHERE near the complete/elite fighter that 2002 Lennox was.

    For your other questions, I think Holmes gives Ali fits prime vs prime, and Louis beats Marciano, but takes some serious punishment in the process.
    Argue all you like the facts are Tyson wiped out the top ten and left no one with any perceived chance of beating him. He lost to the biggest ever shock in boxing because he just didnt train properly and let himself down.

    How long was Lewis the universally recognised best in the world in one period?

    Mike made 6 successfull defences of all 3 belts (losing them in the 7th defence, no other fighter in any other division has held all the titles and defended the, as many times) after unifying 3 separate belts by beating 3 defending champions. Lewis won vacated titles and when he did have them all could only manage a couple of defences of them. He rather chose to drop some so he didnt have to face certain fighters, unlike Mike who proved there was no one in his brief era who could touch him until he big time let himself down in boxing historys biggest shock.
    Last edited by ross; 11-13-2015 at 05:00 AM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Did Mike Tyson duck Forman & Lewis?
    By SlimTrae in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 02-21-2015, 11:44 AM
  2. Tyson of 1988 versus Lewis of 1999
    By Gandalf in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 84
    Last Post: 06-02-2011, 03:29 PM
  3. who wins a peak mike tyson or lennox lewis
    By Tysonbruno in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 258
    Last Post: 05-17-2008, 07:09 PM
  4. Lennox Lewis Mike Tyson press conference
    By The Fightfan in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 05-13-2008, 06:23 AM
  5. LENNOX LEWIS VS MIKE TYSON FULL FIGHT
    By ICB in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-09-2006, 06:28 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing