Absolute Proof Liberalism is a Mental Disorder

[Master]

That is a no then. You would not respect and accept the law of the land.

Master, it is literally IMPOSSIBLE for that to be the "law of the land" as it is against the law for the Federal or State government to make firearms illegal....again, how is that so difficult to comprehend?

So you government can not restrict gun ownership to its citizens?

Certain licenses can be denied, if you're a convicted felon you can't own or even hold a gun. It's not an absolute.....unless you're a law abiding citizen.

What if the government deny its civilians the ownership of guns and only allowed the authorities to have them?

[El Kabong]

That is a no then. You would not respect and accept the law of the land.

Master, it is literally IMPOSSIBLE for that to be the "law of the land" as it is against the law for the Federal or State government to make firearms illegal....again, how is that so difficult to comprehend?

So you government can not restrict gun ownership to its citizens?

Certain licenses can be denied, if you're a convicted felon you can't own or even hold a gun. It's not an absolute.....unless you're a law abiding citizen.

What if the government deny its civilians the ownership of guns and only allowed the authorities to have them?

Since the government is founded on and runs based off of the Constitution it would be unconstitutional for such a law to be passed. That said, if such a law WAS passed then it would be my DUTY as an American citizen to revolt against a tyrannical government.


....is this some kind of novel idea to you? It's fairly simple to me, maybe it's because I grew up with it. Not that I'm some kind of compound having unofficial state militia starting crazy person, just because the Constitution is the rule and guide of government, the Constitution says what the government can't do, and the founding fathers said basically "If the government stops going by the Constitution then it's your job as a citizen to overthrow the government"....that's just the way it is.

[Master]

That is a no then. You would not respect and accept the law of the land.

Master, it is literally IMPOSSIBLE for that to be the "law of the land" as it is against the law for the Federal or State government to make firearms illegal....again, how is that so difficult to comprehend?

So you government can not restrict gun ownership to its citizens?

Certain licenses can be denied, if you're a convicted felon you can't own or even hold a gun. It's not an absolute.....unless you're a law abiding citizen.

What if the government deny its civilians the ownership of guns and only allowed the authorities to have them?

Since the government is founded on and runs based off of the Constitution it would be unconstitutional for such a law to be passed. That said, if such a law WAS passed then it would be my DUTY as an American citizen to revolt against a tyrannical government.


....is this some kind of novel idea to you? It's fairly simple to me, maybe it's because I grew up with it. Not that I'm some kind of compound having unofficial state militia starting crazy person, just because the Constitution is the rule and guide of government, the Constitution says what the government can't do, and the founding fathers said basically "If the government stops going by the Constitution then it's your job as a citizen to overthrow the government"....that's just the way it is.

Just what a freedom fighter/terrorist would say.

[El Kabong]

That is a no then. You would not respect and accept the law of the land.

Master, it is literally IMPOSSIBLE for that to be the "law of the land" as it is against the law for the Federal or State government to make firearms illegal....again, how is that so difficult to comprehend?

So you government can not restrict gun ownership to its citizens?

Certain licenses can be denied, if you're a convicted felon you can't own or even hold a gun. It's not an absolute.....unless you're a law abiding citizen.

What if the government deny its civilians the ownership of guns and only allowed the authorities to have them?

Since the government is founded on and runs based off of the Constitution it would be unconstitutional for such a law to be passed. That said, if such a law WAS passed then it would be my DUTY as an American citizen to revolt against a tyrannical government.


....is this some kind of novel idea to you? It's fairly simple to me, maybe it's because I grew up with it. Not that I'm some kind of compound having unofficial state militia starting crazy person, just because the Constitution is the rule and guide of government, the Constitution says what the government can't do, and the founding fathers said basically "If the government stops going by the Constitution then it's your job as a citizen to overthrow the government"....that's just the way it is.

Just what a freedom fighter/terrorist would say.

Facile argument there Master, I respect you and know you are smarter than that.....but if you care to elaborate be my guest.

[Master]

That is a no then. You would not respect and accept the law of the land.

Master, it is literally IMPOSSIBLE for that to be the "law of the land" as it is against the law for the Federal or State government to make firearms illegal....again, how is that so difficult to comprehend?

So you government can not restrict gun ownership to its citizens?

Certain licenses can be denied, if you're a convicted felon you can't own or even hold a gun. It's not an absolute.....unless you're a law abiding citizen.

What if the government deny its civilians the ownership of guns and only allowed the authorities to have them?

Since the government is founded on and runs based off of the Constitution it would be unconstitutional for such a law to be passed. That said, if such a law WAS passed then it would be my DUTY as an American citizen to revolt against a tyrannical government.


....is this some kind of novel idea to you? It's fairly simple to me, maybe it's because I grew up with it. Not that I'm some kind of compound having unofficial state militia starting crazy person, just because the Constitution is the rule and guide of government, the Constitution says what the government can't do, and the founding fathers said basically "If the government stops going by the Constitution then it's your job as a citizen to overthrow the government"....that's just the way it is.

Just what a freedom fighter/terrorist would say.

Facile argument there Master, I respect you and know you are smarter than that.....but if you care to elaborate be my guest.

You would overthrow the democratic government because you fundamentally disagreed with it.

[El Kabong]

That is a no then. You would not respect and accept the law of the land.

Master, it is literally IMPOSSIBLE for that to be the "law of the land" as it is against the law for the Federal or State government to make firearms illegal....again, how is that so difficult to comprehend?

So you government can not restrict gun ownership to its citizens?

Certain licenses can be denied, if you're a convicted felon you can't own or even hold a gun. It's not an absolute.....unless you're a law abiding citizen.

What if the government deny its civilians the ownership of guns and only allowed the authorities to have them?

Since the government is founded on and runs based off of the Constitution it would be unconstitutional for such a law to be passed. That said, if such a law WAS passed then it would be my DUTY as an American citizen to revolt against a tyrannical government.


....is this some kind of novel idea to you? It's fairly simple to me, maybe it's because I grew up with it. Not that I'm some kind of compound having unofficial state militia starting crazy person, just because the Constitution is the rule and guide of government, the Constitution says what the government can't do, and the founding fathers said basically "If the government stops going by the Constitution then it's your job as a citizen to overthrow the government"....that's just the way it is.

Just what a freedom fighter/terrorist would say.

Facile argument there Master, I respect you and know you are smarter than that.....but if you care to elaborate be my guest.

You would overthrow the democratic government because you fundamentally disagreed with it.

Again, that's a facile argument.

No.

I would fight the government because the government would have overstepped it's bounds and infringed on the rights of all law abiding Americans.....ergo the government would be considered "tyrannical" and I would be lawfully justified in rebelling against that "democratic government".


It's not a matter of "disagreeing" it's a matter of government overreach.

[brocktonblockbust]

That is a no then. You would not respect and accept the law of the land.

Master, it is literally IMPOSSIBLE for that to be the "law of the land" as it is against the law for the Federal or State government to make firearms illegal....again, how is that so difficult to comprehend?

So you government can not restrict gun ownership to its citizens?

Certain licenses can be denied, if you're a convicted felon you can't own or even hold a gun. It's not an absolute.....unless you're a law abiding citizen.

What if the government deny its civilians the ownership of guns and only allowed the authorities to have them?

Since the government is founded on and runs based off of the Constitution it would be unconstitutional for such a law to be passed. That said, if such a law WAS passed then it would be my DUTY as an American citizen to revolt against a tyrannical government.


....is this some kind of novel idea to you? It's fairly simple to me, maybe it's because I grew up with it. Not that I'm some kind of compound having unofficial state militia starting crazy person, just because the Constitution is the rule and guide of government, the Constitution says what the government can't do, and the founding fathers said basically "If the government stops going by the Constitution then it's your job as a citizen to overthrow the government"....that's just the way it is.

Just what a freedom fighter/terrorist would say.

Facile argument there Master, I respect you and know you are smarter than that.....but if you care to elaborate be my guest.

You would overthrow the democratic government because you fundamentally disagreed with it.

Again, that's a facile argument.

No.

I would fight the government because the government would have overstepped it's bounds and infringed on the rights of all law abiding Americans.....ergo the government would be considered "tyrannical" and I would be lawfully justified in rebelling against that "democratic government".


It's not a matter of "disagreeing" it's a matter of government overreach.

I will not rely on Hillary clinton or Obama to protect me..... I need protection from THEM, for when the whackos come for our guns. We went through King George once, we aint doin it again ---- unarmed, atleast.

[Master]

That is a no then. You would not respect and accept the law of the land.

Master, it is literally IMPOSSIBLE for that to be the "law of the land" as it is against the law for the Federal or State government to make firearms illegal....again, how is that so difficult to comprehend?

So you government can not restrict gun ownership to its citizens?

Certain licenses can be denied, if you're a convicted felon you can't own or even hold a gun. It's not an absolute.....unless you're a law abiding citizen.

What if the government deny its civilians the ownership of guns and only allowed the authorities to have them?

Since the government is founded on and runs based off of the Constitution it would be unconstitutional for such a law to be passed. That said, if such a law WAS passed then it would be my DUTY as an American citizen to revolt against a tyrannical government.


....is this some kind of novel idea to you? It's fairly simple to me, maybe it's because I grew up with it. Not that I'm some kind of compound having unofficial state militia starting crazy person, just because the Constitution is the rule and guide of government, the Constitution says what the government can't do, and the founding fathers said basically "If the government stops going by the Constitution then it's your job as a citizen to overthrow the government"....that's just the way it is.

Just what a freedom fighter/terrorist would say.

Facile argument there Master, I respect you and know you are smarter than that.....but if you care to elaborate be my guest.

You would overthrow the democratic government because you fundamentally disagreed with it.

Again, that's a facile argument.

No.

I would fight the government because the government would have overstepped it's bounds and infringed on the rights of all law abiding Americans.....ergo the government would be considered "tyrannical" and I would be lawfully justified in rebelling against that "democratic government".


It's not a matter of "disagreeing" it's a matter of government overreach.

It is not a facile argument when you would pick up a gun against your own government.