Gacria vs Guerrero fight!

[TitoFan]

Fixes in boxing and slanted cards and judges are not dependent on venue city.

You've heard of Texas, no?

[Sleepwalker]

So Guerrero is from Southern Cal, close to LA....... and Garcia is from Philly....... but Guerrero will get shafted by the judges?

Guess there's something I don't know about.

Why would some judges who flew in from someplace else give two shits about a home crowd?

Fact is, Garcia is much more likely to generate more boxing revenue in future fights than Guerrero. All Danny he had to do was be competitive and the decision was his.

[Spicoli]

At least he shut down that silly Mayweather snowball from dumb guy asking him questions.

[TitoFan]

Are you guys for real?? So ok.... hometown decisions don't exist and are a figment of the imagination, right?
There have been no shady decisions in Texas involving Mexican or Mexican-American fighters, right?

Whew! That's a relief.
I guess it's all been a bad dream.

[Lineal]

I had Garcia ahead 7 - 5

[beenKOed]

Oh please...just because the fight is in LA is not relevant when its a Haymon production. Fixes in boxing and slanted cards and judges are not dependent on venue city. Guerrero needed a gun to get a decision here and LA had nothing to do with it.

So, you really think Guerrero won?

[IamInuit]

Fixes in boxing and slanted cards and judges are not dependent on venue city.

You've heard of Texas, no?

Yeah. Thats one city but had this fight happened there, the results would have been the same. My point is that in this fight the city had nothing to do with the fix.

PBC fights although I enjoy them mainly do to the undercards have a script for the headliner regardless of the city they are in for certain fighters.

[TitoFan]

Who gives a flying one where judges fly in from?
They can be influenced just the same by the organizations and behind-the-scenes interests in boxing.

[TitoFan]

Fixes in boxing and slanted cards and judges are not dependent on venue city.

You've heard of Texas, no?

Yeah. Thats one city but had this fight happened there, the results would have been the same. My point is that in this fight the city had nothing to do with the fix.

PBC fights although I enjoy them mainly do to the undercards have a script for the headliner regardless of the city they are in for certain fighters.

I can see the favoritism for a Golden Boy or a Mayweather, but for Garcia?
We're all going to have different opinions but mine is that Garcia is not the marquee name that will skew decisions his way in a shameful manner as some other fighters have.

[IamInuit]

Oh please...just because the fight is in LA is not relevant when its a Haymon production. Fixes in boxing and slanted cards and judges are not dependent on venue city. Guerrero needed a gun to get a decision here and LA had nothing to do with it.

So, you really think Guerrero won?

Yes I do but it was not hard to predict what would happen if it went 12. This is common practice these days. Its not Garcias fault. FFS they are fixing tennis. You have to do more then win it against certain guys. Look at poor Herrera. Did he not beat Garcia also?

[Spicoli]

Yeh less of a boarder dispute and all about product and promotion. I had Guerrero by a hair but we all knew ahead of time he was brought in to serve role once again. Garcia has seen this and benefited before, I thought he looked like a guy going thru the motions in gaps and showed little versatility.

[Violent Demise]

Fixes in boxing and slanted cards and judges are not dependent on venue city.

You've heard of Texas, no?

Yeah. Thats one city but had this fight happened there, the results would have been the same. My point is that in this fight the city had nothing to do with the fix.

PBC fights although I enjoy them mainly do to the undercards have a script for the headliner regardless of the city they are in for certain fighters.

I can see the favoritism for a Golden Boy or a Mayweather, but for Garcia?
We're all going to have different opinions but mine is that Garcia is not the marquee name that will skew decisions his way in a shameful manner as some other fighters have.

Herrera and Peterson fights say otherwise

[TitoFan]

Fixes in boxing and slanted cards and judges are not dependent on venue city.

You've heard of Texas, no?

Yeah. Thats one city but had this fight happened there, the results would have been the same. My point is that in this fight the city had nothing to do with the fix.

PBC fights although I enjoy them mainly do to the undercards have a script for the headliner regardless of the city they are in for certain fighters.

I can see the favoritism for a Golden Boy or a Mayweather, but for Garcia?
We're all going to have different opinions but mine is that Garcia is not the marquee name that will skew decisions his way in a shameful manner as some other fighters have.

Herrera and Peterson fights say otherwise

I thought Garcia deserved to lose the Herrera fight.... it was an ugly, lousy effort.
The Peterson fight was closer, IMO.

This one tonight definitely cannot be considered a robbery.
Guerrero won the first half..... Garcia won the second.

[powerpuncher]

It's weird people thought Guerrero won. I stopped scoring after the 7th I think but I had Garcia ahead at that point and he definitely looked like he did better than Guerrero later in the fight. There is no way he lost the first 4 rounds like some of you claimed. It seemed like a close but clear decision for Garcia. No robbery and no controversy.

[Fenster]

There was only one winner - Garcia. Around 8-4 seems fair to me. Guerrero was in the fight early then from the 5th/6th onwards Garcia not only outboxed him but landed all the eye catching shots/combos.