Which fight is worse?

[Spicoli]

Split down the middle honestly. Khan was in all actuality dented, vulnerable and seemingly clinging to that elusive "event" what ever the cost. On the other side we knew Canelo was a con at middle. An imposter. Basically lowered expectations. With Golovkin he was the adult in the room when Cotto and Canelo came up at middleweight. He was respected and held to higher standards. I don't begrudge a guy a payday but this is only duplicating Canelos cash grab. Brook is a helluva fighter really banking on a single high profile win who himself has already rebounded in a foty candidate with Thurman. The no in between or credible build to division is what gets me. Many of the top guys named at least made pit stops at 154 while some who did not were knocked senseless.

Khan was schooling Canelo and had he won a decision you would not use such fodder . It is obvious you dislike Canelo. As Danny DeVito says "Garbage"' " I'm the trash man!

What school was that, clown College? Everyone with functional gray matter knew that farce was a matter of time not "if". Canelo is a spoiled lil tart and what he and Golovkin have in common now is needing smaller less proven fighters to bank on and ride the push afterwards. Its a joke. Oh and DeVito hasn't had a hit movie in years and was funniest while intoxicated on David Lettermans show . FACT!