how many MODs do we have in this forum?

[Master]

Is it International Chip on the Shoulder Day today and nobody told me?

Seems like everyone but you has a chip on their shoulder. You are just reading an inference that is not there and then getting in a tizzy about it. Which is quite ironic.

Oh hi, welcome to the fray.
Took you about 30 seconds to throw your punches.
Getting a little slow in your old age, there.

Word of advice.
If you don't bother to read the entire context, stay out of it.
I realize it's like pissing in the wind, but there's hoping.

Two of my favourite posters at each others throat, come on lads let's have a truce?

[Spicoli]

We need to get VD back in here and that'll solve everything for Tito

[smashup]

I write something totally innocent.
Smashup gets defensive about it.
I defend myself.
Smashup tells me my post indicated I was angry at something the Mods did.
I asked him to reread my post and tell me where it indicates I was angry about anything.
No response was given.
You chimed in, as you're wont to do... obviously to the aid of your friend, and not knowing a damn thing about what's going on.
I think that about sizes it all up, don't you?

Ahh... it's all in a day's work.

You have resurrected this thread and said it causes "Issues" having the amount of Mods we have and let's be honest here every other post you've made since that is an angry one so i'll ask you again to please share with us whatever it is that's pissed you off?
I'm far from "on the defensive" with you just wondering what your upset about to see if it can be resolved in an adult way.

Anyway it's Huck Time

[TitoFan]

We need to get VD back in here and that'll solve everything for Tito

You mean my ol' buddy?

Oh crap..... there goes my ulcer acting up again.

[Beanz]

Is it International Chip on the Shoulder Day today and nobody told me?

Seems like everyone but you has a chip on their shoulder. You are just reading an inference that is not there and then getting in a tizzy about it. Which is quite ironic.

Oh hi, welcome to the fray.
Took you about 30 seconds to throw your punches.
Getting a little slow in your old age, there.

Word of advice.
If you don't bother to read the entire context, stay out of it.
I realize it's like pissing in the wind, but there's hoping.

Two of my favourite posters at each others throat, come on lads let's have a truce?

There is absolutely no malice, anger or any of that rubbish in my post. "throw my punches"? Honestly Tito you really have got the wrong end of the stick. Please do me a favour and go back and read the post which you accused smashup of being defensive in?


Was he being defensive ? Absolutely not, not even slightly

I repeat again you are reading anger were it is not present


not even slightly

[TitoFan]

Is it International Chip on the Shoulder Day today and nobody told me?

Seems like everyone but you has a chip on their shoulder. You are just reading an inference that is not there and then getting in a tizzy about it. Which is quite ironic.

Oh hi, welcome to the fray.
Took you about 30 seconds to throw your punches.
Getting a little slow in your old age, there.

Word of advice.
If you don't bother to read the entire context, stay out of it.
I realize it's like pissing in the wind, but there's hoping.

Two of my favourite posters at each others throat, come on lads let's have a truce?

There is absolutely no malice, anger or any of that rubbish in my post. "throw my punches"? Honestly Tito you really have got the wrong end of the stick. Please do me a favour and go back and read the post which you accused smashup of being defensive in?


Was he being defensive ? Absolutely not, not even slightly

I repeat again you are reading anger were it is not present


not even slightly

I'm gonna throw the possibility out there that this may be a language/ cultural thing.

Over here... when you make a couple of statements and follow that up with "Do you have a problem with that?"...... that is normally considered being defensive. Maybe over there it isn't. Also, written words have the disadvantage of not having the voice inflection that can make all the difference.

But back to MY original post. Smashup incorrectly inferred that I had a problem with Ross being banned. A bit laughable if you think about it... as Ross and I rarely engage except to disagree about Fury, Cotto, or any other assorted subjects.

If you go back even further than that, I bumped this old thread to make a few points, but none of them were expressed in an angry fashion. Again... maybe it's a cultural thing, but it seems I have a different idea of what "angry" is from you and smashup.

Am I disappointed that vidgil is gone? Sure. He started off as a very nice poster, but got in tussles with you, and paid the price. It doesn't help that he vented his anger in a general way, making it easier to get rid of him. He was a pretty good dude with a pretty good sense of humor. Maybe not cut off the same mold as the majority here, but again diversity is good for the forum.

I'm still shaking my head, though not surprised in the least bit, how you came charging in.... first thing when you got on.... to join a mild fracas obviously taking the other guy's side. You didn't even need to know what it was all about. It's just not a very mature thing to do, IMHO.

[Spicoli]

We need to get VD back in here and that'll solve everything for Tito

You mean my ol' buddy?

Oh crap..... there goes my ulcer acting up again.

Certainly beats calling out moderators

[TitoFan]

We need to get VD back in here and that'll solve everything for Tito

You mean my ol' buddy?

Oh crap..... there goes my ulcer acting up again.

Certainly beats calling out moderators

C'mon man. We're allowed to disagree with a Moderator, right?

Moderators can make mistakes, right? Please say yes to both of these, so I can sleep better tonight.

[Beanz]

Is it International Chip on the Shoulder Day today and nobody told me?

Seems like everyone but you has a chip on their shoulder. You are just reading an inference that is not there and then getting in a tizzy about it. Which is quite ironic.

Oh hi, welcome to the fray.
Took you about 30 seconds to throw your punches.
Getting a little slow in your old age, there.

Word of advice.
If you don't bother to read the entire context, stay out of it.
I realize it's like pissing in the wind, but there's hoping.

Two of my favourite posters at each others throat, come on lads let's have a truce?

There is absolutely no malice, anger or any of that rubbish in my post. "throw my punches"? Honestly Tito you really have got the wrong end of the stick. Please do me a favour and go back and read the post which you accused smashup of being defensive in?


Was he being defensive ? Absolutely not, not even slightly

I repeat again you are reading anger were it is not present


not even slightly

I'm gonna throw the possibility out there that this may be a language/ cultural thing.

Over here... when you make a couple of statements and follow that up with "Do you have a problem with that?"...... that is normally considered being defensive. Maybe over there it isn't. Also, written words have the disadvantage of not having the voice inflection that can make all the difference.

But back to MY original post. Smashup incorrectly inferred that I had a problem with Ross being banned. A bit laughable if you think about it... as Ross and I rarely engage except to disagree about Fury, Cotto, or any other assorted subjects.

If you go back even further than that, I bumped this old thread to make a few points, but none of them were expressed in an angry fashion. Again... maybe it's a cultural thing, but it seems I have a different idea of what "angry" is from you and smashup.

Am I disappointed that vidgil is gone? Sure. He started off as a very nice poster, but got in tussles with you, and paid the price. It doesn't help that he vented his anger in a general way, making it easier to get rid of him. He was a pretty good dude with a pretty good sense of humor. Maybe not cut off the same mold as the majority here, but again diversity is good for the forum.

I'm still shaking my head, though not surprised in the least bit, how you came charging in.... first thing when you got on.... to join a mild fracas obviously taking the other guy's side. You didn't even need to know what it was all about. It's just not a very mature thing to do, IMHO.

Yes definitely cultural but I think also a bit more than that.

First I am watching the Breidis -Huck fight at the moment with the other European in fact at the moment all British fight fans . That might give you a clue explaining how you may be barking up the wrong tree.

Secondly It was not the first thing I posted on today at all I posted in about 4 threads before returning to this post that i posted in yesterday


None of this is angry stuff just explaining

Finally again the Vidgil thing. Is he even banned? so how was he got rid of? He constantly stirred up the shit. You can call him self effacing till the cows some home, but it's simply not true. I tried my best to be civil with him but to little avail.

Nobody got rid of him he stormed off slagging off the forum after the most innocuous comment from Master which you have read, and then left slagging off me. It had bugger all to do with me. So how did he pay the price


Is this what you are saying? DO you seriously believe that I am somehow being protected by the mods?

HA! you do don't you? I have just realised this


If people tell a lie enough times then people start to believe it and I hate to even mention his name but it's no secret that Brockton has been going on and on about me being both protected and paranoid for literally years now and it seems not only Vidgil but you believe him


I can't help you there. I can't prove that I am not paranoid. I can't prove that I am not angry , but just for one second consider the remote possibility that I might be telling the truth.

[Spicoli]

We need to get VD back in here and that'll solve everything for Tito

You mean my ol' buddy?

Oh crap..... there goes my ulcer acting up again.

Certainly beats calling out moderators

C'mon man. We're allowed to disagree with a Moderator, right?

Moderators can make mistakes, right? Please say yes to both of these, so I can sleep better tonight.

Hey I disagree with myself the minute I walk into work sometimes . Everyone makes mistakes for sure. But simply disagreeing with a decision by mod doesn't mean it was his/her mistake .

speaking of sleep I need an old man nap!

[TitoFan]

I hate to even mention his name but it's no secret that Brockton has been going on and on about me being both protected and paranoid for literally years now and it seems not only Vidgil but you believe him

Brockton? He curses me out in bad Spanish out of the blue, like some demented schizo.

Why should I follow his line of thinking?

Instead, he should follow mine.

[Fenster]

Blimey, just reading through this thread, i've been a mod for 9 years. Not one person had a bad word to say about me, I must be/have been a right boring cunt.

[brocktonblockbust]

beanz wrote "orange clock" and now beanz has mentioned me by name @Fenster i told you he couldnt resist whilst i have totally ignored him as you asked me, in the mean time @TitoFan is beyond help down there tomando y fumando y chingando como el fin del mundo.

[Batman]

Blimey, just reading through this thread, i've been a mod for 9 years. Not one person had a bad word to say about me, I must be/have been a right boring cunt.

That Fenster bloke is a right twat, strutting around the place full of self importance and chatting shit all the time. FACT

[Dark Lord Al]

Is it International Chip on the Shoulder Day today and nobody told me?

Seems like everyone but you has a chip on their shoulder. You are just reading an inference that is not there and then getting in a tizzy about it. Which is quite ironic.

Beanz I don't agree on my shoulder it really is more of a " Pont Neuf " Potato.