Vasyl Lomachenko is P4P #1

[TitoFan]

I thought I made it clear that I said "clear" as I based it on talent/skill/abilty more than records. Clearly I didn't make that clear ().

@Master - Brook weighed 160 like all Golovkin's other middleweight opponents. It's irrelevant though as you've stated Golovkin let him do better than the others.

If you believe it's illogical that fighters moving up in weight can't be tougher than men that already fight at the weight, I suggest you take a look back through the history of boxing. You will get the shock of your life mate.

Seriously, these fighters will blow your mind - start with a Filipino fella named Manny Pacquiao, Roberto Duran, Sugar Ray Leonard, Hearns, De La Hoya, Ricky Burns, Duke McKenzie.

All the fighters you mentioned, and you could include a few others as well, worked their way up through the weight divisions. Brook had fought exclusively at welter and jumped up to middleweight in one fell swoop to challenge one of the best MW's in history out of the blue. Big difference. Once he gets beaten he goes right back down. Again... big difference. Not taking anything away from the man. But it was a bad experiment gone wrong. Brook couldn't hurt GGG, and they both knew it.

I never said Brook compares to those fighters. I helped Master understand the history of boxing.

Those fighters are an example of why it's NOT illogical for a fighter two weights below to be tougher than contenders/ex champions at the weight the champion fights at.

How can a fighter two weights below be tougher fight that contenders/ex champions at the weight the champion fights at?

Illogical, but if it keeps you happy to think it does, then so be it.

I'm here to help.

"I'm here to help." =

[Master]

I thought I made it clear that I said "clear" as I based it on talent/skill/abilty more than records. Clearly I didn't make that clear ().

@Master - Brook weighed 160 like all Golovkin's other middleweight opponents. It's irrelevant though as you've stated Golovkin let him do better than the others.

If you believe it's illogical that fighters moving up in weight can't be tougher than men that already fight at the weight, I suggest you take a look back through the history of boxing. You will get the shock of your life mate.

Seriously, these fighters will blow your mind - start with a Filipino fella named Manny Pacquiao, Roberto Duran, Sugar Ray Leonard, Hearns, De La Hoya, Ricky Burns, Duke McKenzie.

All the fighters you mentioned, and you could include a few others as well, worked their way up through the weight divisions. Brook had fought exclusively at welter and jumped up to middleweight in one fell swoop to challenge one of the best MW's in history out of the blue. Big difference. Once he gets beaten he goes right back down. Again... big difference. Not taking anything away from the man. But it was a bad experiment gone wrong. Brook couldn't hurt GGG, and they both knew it.

I never said Brook compares to those fighters. I helped Master understand the history of boxing.

Those fighters are an example of why it's NOT illogical for a fighter two weights below to be tougher than contenders/ex champions at the weight the champion fights at.

How can a fighter two weights below be tougher fight that contenders/ex champions at the weight the champion fights at?

Illogical, but if it keeps you happy to think it does, then so be it.

I'm here to help.

"I'm here to help." =

You know I am right, just tell Fenster he is talking crap.

[TitoFan]

I did.
In my own, subtle, humorous way.



I debunked several of his myths in the span of 2-3 posts awhile back.

[Master]

I did.
In my own, subtle, humorous way.



I debunked several of his myths in the span of 2-3 posts awhile back.

Yet he conveniently missed them and went off in his own posts of wisdom.

[Fenster]

I did.
In my own, subtle, humorous way.



I debunked several of his myths in the span of 2-3 posts awhile back.

Yet he conveniently missed them and went off in his own posts of wisdom.

It wont get any better for you asking him for help.

He makes you look sharp.

[Master]

I did.
In my own, subtle, humorous way.



I debunked several of his myths in the span of 2-3 posts awhile back.

Yet he conveniently missed them and went off in his own posts of wisdom.

It wont get any better for you asking him for help.

He makes you look sharp.

Must be great living in your world where everything you say is right.

[Fenster]

Don't get upset because you can't form a cogent argument. I'm not the one that resorts to ad homienm, silly pictures or back slapping mardy mates accusing someone of saying things they never said.

All I asked was why the middleweights were superior opponents than Brook even though evidence shows that Brook had much better success. Eventually you answered - "Golovkin let him do better." Fine. That's your opinion, I never said it's wrong, it's fucking stupid, but your opinion nonetheless.

I never once compared Brook to anyone. I gave you an example of why it's not illogical - as you claimed - for smaller men to successfully challenge bigger men. It's not my fault if idiots dive into the middle of conversations without understanding the context.

[Fenster]

I did.
In my own, subtle, humorous way.



I debunked several of his myths in the span of 2-3 posts awhile back.

I can't see a single post you made that had anything to do with what I've said.

Feel free to show me.